Usefulness of the pediatric appendicitis score for assessing the severity of acute appendicitis in children.


Journal

Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
ISSN: 1442-200X
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Int
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 100886002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 17 05 2019
revised: 25 07 2019
accepted: 01 10 2019
pubmed: 28 10 2019
medline: 21 10 2020
entrez: 27 10 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We investigated relationships between the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and pathological progression and disease severity in pediatric acute appendicitis. We retrospectively evaluated 72 children who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis. We divided them into groups: simple appendicitis (n = 28) or complicated appendicitis (n = 44). We compared the influence of age, body temperature, blood test findings, hospitalization period, number of complications, and PAS between the groups. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PAS for diagnosing complicated appendicitis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate the cut-off value for diagnosing complicated appendicitis. To assess the severity of acute appendicitis, we divided the patients into groups according to that cut-off value. There were statistically significant differences in the PAS between simple appendicitis and complicated appendicitis (5.8 versus 7.9). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a PAS cut-off value of 8. A PAS ≥ 8 had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 68%. A PAS ≥ 8 was associated with significantly longer hospitalization and more complications than a PAS < 8. The PAS may be associated with pathological progression and disease severity in appendicitis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We investigated relationships between the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and pathological progression and disease severity in pediatric acute appendicitis.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated 72 children who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis. We divided them into groups: simple appendicitis (n = 28) or complicated appendicitis (n = 44). We compared the influence of age, body temperature, blood test findings, hospitalization period, number of complications, and PAS between the groups. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PAS for diagnosing complicated appendicitis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate the cut-off value for diagnosing complicated appendicitis. To assess the severity of acute appendicitis, we divided the patients into groups according to that cut-off value.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were statistically significant differences in the PAS between simple appendicitis and complicated appendicitis (5.8 versus 7.9). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a PAS cut-off value of 8. A PAS ≥ 8 had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 68%. A PAS ≥ 8 was associated with significantly longer hospitalization and more complications than a PAS < 8.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The PAS may be associated with pathological progression and disease severity in appendicitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31654464
doi: 10.1111/ped.14032
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

70-73

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Japan Pediatric Society.

Références

Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011. Am. Surg. 2014; 80: 1074-7.
Sivit CJ, Siegel MJ, Applegate KE, Newman KD. When appendicitis is suspected in children. Radiographics 2001; 21: 247-88.
Huang L, Yin Y, Yang L, Wang C, Li Y, Zhou Z. Comparison of antibiotic therapy and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 426-34.
Gorter RR, The SML, Gorter-Stam MAW et al. Systematic review of nonoperative versus operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017; 52: 1219-27.
Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002; 37: 877-81.
Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015; 26 (386): 1278-87.
Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic test. Cancer 1950; 3: 32-5.
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 248: 452-8.
Kaneko K, Tsuda M. Ultrasound-based decision making in the treatment of acute appendicitis in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004; 39: 1316-20.
Hoecker CC, Billman GF. The utility of unenhanced computed tomography in appendicitis in children. J. Emerg. Med. 2005; 28: 415-21.
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 289-96.
Damron TA, Nazarian A, Entezari V et al. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016; 474: 643-51.
Adibe OO, Muensterer OJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Severity of appendicitis correlates with the pediatric appendicitis score. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2011; 27: 655-8.
Goldman RD, Carter S, Stephens D, Antoon R, Mounstephen W, Langer JC. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J. Pediatr. 2008; 153: 278-282.
Salö M, Friman G, Stenström P, Ohlsson B. Arnbjörnsson E. Appendicitis in children: evaluation of the pediatric appendicitis score in younger and older children. Surg. Res. Pract. 2014; 2014: 1-6.

Auteurs

Takayuki Fujii (T)

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kitagun, Japan.

Aya Tanaka (A)

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kitagun, Japan.

Hiroto Katami (H)

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kitagun, Japan.

Ryuichi Shimono (R)

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kitagun, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH