Variations in genome size between wild and domesticated lineages of fowls belonging to the Gallus gallus species.


Journal

Genomics
ISSN: 1089-8646
Titre abrégé: Genomics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8800135

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
received: 11 02 2019
revised: 05 08 2019
accepted: 07 10 2019
pubmed: 2 11 2019
medline: 13 1 2021
entrez: 1 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Efforts to elucidate the causes of biological differences between wild fowls and their domesticated relatives, the chicken, have to date mainly focused on the identification of single nucleotide mutations. Other types of genomic variations have however been demonstrated to be important in avian evolution and associated to variations in phenotype. They include several types of sequences duplicated in tandem that can vary in their repetition number. Here we report on genome size differences between the red jungle fowl and several domestic chicken breeds and selected lines. Sequences duplicated in tandem such as rDNA, telomere repeats, satellite DNA and segmental duplications were found to have been significantly re-shaped during domestication and subsequently by human-mediated selection. We discuss the extent to which changes in genome organization that occurred during domestication agree with the hypothesis that domesticated animal genomes have been shaped by evolutionary forces aiming to adapt them to anthropized environments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31669705
pii: S0888-7543(19)30074-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.004
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Ribosomal 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1660-1673

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Benoît Piégu (B)

PRC, UMR INRA0085, CNRS 7247, Centre INRA Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Peter Arensburger (P)

Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, United States.

Linda Beauclair (L)

PRC, UMR INRA0085, CNRS 7247, Centre INRA Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Marie Chabault (M)

BOA, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Emilie Raynaud (E)

BOA, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Vincent Coustham (V)

BOA, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Sophie Brard (S)

SYSAAF, Centre INRA Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Sébastien Guizard (S)

PRC, UMR INRA0085, CNRS 7247, Centre INRA Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France; Florimond Desprez, 3 Rue Florimond Desprez, 59242 Cappelle en Pélève, France.

Thierry Burlot (T)

NOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960 Pledran, France.

Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval (E)

BOA, INRA, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France.

Yves Bigot (Y)

PRC, UMR INRA0085, CNRS 7247, Centre INRA Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France. Electronic address: yves.bigot@inra.fr.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH