Ticagrelor Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy From 1 Month After Drug-Eluting Coronary Stenting.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 11 2019
Historique:
received: 02 05 2019
revised: 08 08 2019
accepted: 10 08 2019
entrez: 2 11 2019
pubmed: 2 11 2019
medline: 23 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The GLOBAL LEADERS (GLOBAL LEADERS: A Clinical Study Comparing Two Forms of Anti-platelet Therapy After Stent Implantation) study randomly assigned 15,991 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin. Apart from Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), all study endpoints were analyzed as investigator reported. This was a pre-specified ancillary study assessing whether experimental therapy is noninferior, and if met, superior, to conventional treatment for the coprimary efficacy endpoint of all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or urgent target vessel revascularization and superior in preventing BARC 3 (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or 5 bleeding (coprimary safety endpoint) at 2 years with a 0.025 significance level to preserve nominal 5% alpha error. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated investigator-reported and eventually unreported events of 7,585 patients from the 20 top-enrolling participating sites. The 2-year coprimary efficacy endpoint occurred in 271 (7.14%) and in 319 (8.41%) patients in the experimental and conventional groups, respectively (rate ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.99), fulfilling noninferiority (p noninferiority <0.001), but not superiority (p superiority = 0.0465). The rates of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding did not differ (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.33; p = 0.986). A time-dependent treatment effect was observed with the experimental strategy being associated with a lower risk of MI (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88; p interaction = 0.062) and definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.63; p interaction = 0.007) after 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention. Ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT was noninferior, but not superior, to conventional treatment in the prevention of ischemic events, and it did not decrease major bleeding risk as compared with conventional treatment. (GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-Study [GLASSY]; NCT03231059).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The GLOBAL LEADERS (GLOBAL LEADERS: A Clinical Study Comparing Two Forms of Anti-platelet Therapy After Stent Implantation) study randomly assigned 15,991 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin. Apart from Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), all study endpoints were analyzed as investigator reported.
OBJECTIVES
This was a pre-specified ancillary study assessing whether experimental therapy is noninferior, and if met, superior, to conventional treatment for the coprimary efficacy endpoint of all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or urgent target vessel revascularization and superior in preventing BARC 3 (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) or 5 bleeding (coprimary safety endpoint) at 2 years with a 0.025 significance level to preserve nominal 5% alpha error.
METHODS
An independent clinical event committee adjudicated investigator-reported and eventually unreported events of 7,585 patients from the 20 top-enrolling participating sites.
RESULTS
The 2-year coprimary efficacy endpoint occurred in 271 (7.14%) and in 319 (8.41%) patients in the experimental and conventional groups, respectively (rate ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.99), fulfilling noninferiority (p noninferiority <0.001), but not superiority (p superiority = 0.0465). The rates of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding did not differ (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.33; p = 0.986). A time-dependent treatment effect was observed with the experimental strategy being associated with a lower risk of MI (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.88; p interaction = 0.062) and definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.63; p interaction = 0.007) after 1-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT was noninferior, but not superior, to conventional treatment in the prevention of ischemic events, and it did not decrease major bleeding risk as compared with conventional treatment. (GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-Study [GLASSY]; NCT03231059).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31672177
pii: S0735-1097(19)37534-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1038
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors 0
Ticagrelor GLH0314RVC

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03231059']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2223-2234

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anna Franzone (A)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Eugène McFadden (E)

Cardialysis Core Laboratories and Clinical Trial Management, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Sergio Leonardi (S)

University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

Raffaele Piccolo (R)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

Pascal Vranckx (P)

Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hartcentrum Hasselt, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Belgium.

Patrick W Serruys (PW)

Department of Cardiology, Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom.

Edouard Benit (E)

Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.

Christoph Liebetrau (C)

Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site RheinMain, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Luc Janssens (L)

Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.

Maurizio Ferrario (M)

University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

Aleksander Zurakowski (A)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, American Heart of Poland SA, Chrzanów, Poland.

Roberto Diletti (R)

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Marcello Dominici (M)

S. Maria University-Hospital, Terni, Italy.

Kurt Huber (K)

3rd Medical Department, Cardiology, Wilhelminenhospital, and Sigmund Freud University Medical School, Vienna, Austria.

Ton Slagboom (T)

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Paweł Buszman (P)

Center for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, Sanatoryjna 1, Ustroń, Poland; Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Medical University of Silesia, Poniatowskiego 15, Katowice.

Leonardo Bolognese (L)

Azienda Toscana Usl Sudest, Arezzo, Italy.

Carlo Tumscitz (C)

Cardiology Unit Sant'Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.

Krzysztof Bryniarski (K)

Jagiellonian University Medical College, The John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.

Adel Aminian (A)

Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.

Mathias Vrolix (M)

Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.

Ivo Petrov (I)

Acibadem City Clinic Cardiovascular Center, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Scot Garg (S)

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, United Kingdom.

Christoph Naber (C)

Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland.

Janusz Prokopczuk (J)

Polsko-Amerykańskie Kliniki Serca Kozle, Kozle, Poland.

Christian Hamm (C)

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site RheinMain, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

Philippe Gabriel Steg (PG)

Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France.

Dik Heg (D)

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine and Clinical Trials Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Peter Jüni (P)

Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Stephan Windecker (S)

Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Marco Valgimigli (M)

Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: marco.valgimigli@insel.ch.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH