Extent, nature and consequences of performing outside scope of training in global health.
Ethics
Global health
Medical education
Professionalism
Scope of practice
Scope of training
Journal
Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
received:
19
06
2019
accepted:
11
10
2019
entrez:
3
11
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Globalization has made it possible for global health professionals and trainees to participate in short-term training and professional experiences in a variety of clinical- and non-clinical activities across borders. Consequently, greater numbers of healthcare professionals and trainees from high-income countries (HICs) are working or volunteering abroad and participating in short-term experiences in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). How effective these activities are in advancing global health and in addressing the crisis of human resources for health remains controversial. What is known, however, is that during these short-term experiences in global health (STEGH), health professionals and those in training often face substantive ethical challenges. A common dilemma described is that of acting outside of one's scope of training. However, the frequency, nature, circumstances, and consequences of performing outside scope of training (POST) have not been well-explored or quantified. The authors conducted an online survey of HIC health professionals and trainees working or volunteering in LMICs about their experiences with POST, within the last 5 years. A total of 223 survey responses were included in the final analysis. Half (49%) of respondents reported having been asked to perform outside their scope of training; of these, 61% reported POST. Trainees were nearly twice as likely as licensed professionals to report POST. Common reasons cited for POST were a mismatch of skills with host expectations, suboptimal supervision at host sites, inadequate preparation to decline POST, a perceived lack of alternative options and emergency situations. Many of the respondents who reported POST expressed moral distress that persisted over time. Given that POST is ethically problematic and legally impermissible, the high rates of being asked, and deciding to do so, were notable. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that additional efforts are needed to reduce the incidence of POST during STEGH, including pre-departure training to navigate dilemmas concerning POST, clear communication regarding expectations, and greater attention to the moral distress experienced by those contending with POST.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Globalization has made it possible for global health professionals and trainees to participate in short-term training and professional experiences in a variety of clinical- and non-clinical activities across borders. Consequently, greater numbers of healthcare professionals and trainees from high-income countries (HICs) are working or volunteering abroad and participating in short-term experiences in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). How effective these activities are in advancing global health and in addressing the crisis of human resources for health remains controversial. What is known, however, is that during these short-term experiences in global health (STEGH), health professionals and those in training often face substantive ethical challenges. A common dilemma described is that of acting outside of one's scope of training. However, the frequency, nature, circumstances, and consequences of performing outside scope of training (POST) have not been well-explored or quantified.
METHODS
The authors conducted an online survey of HIC health professionals and trainees working or volunteering in LMICs about their experiences with POST, within the last 5 years.
RESULTS
A total of 223 survey responses were included in the final analysis. Half (49%) of respondents reported having been asked to perform outside their scope of training; of these, 61% reported POST. Trainees were nearly twice as likely as licensed professionals to report POST. Common reasons cited for POST were a mismatch of skills with host expectations, suboptimal supervision at host sites, inadequate preparation to decline POST, a perceived lack of alternative options and emergency situations. Many of the respondents who reported POST expressed moral distress that persisted over time.
CONCLUSIONS
Given that POST is ethically problematic and legally impermissible, the high rates of being asked, and deciding to do so, were notable. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that additional efforts are needed to reduce the incidence of POST during STEGH, including pre-departure training to navigate dilemmas concerning POST, clear communication regarding expectations, and greater attention to the moral distress experienced by those contending with POST.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31675976
doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0506-6
pii: 10.1186/s12992-019-0506-6
pmc: PMC6823963
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Références
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Mar;12(1):129-36
pubmed: 25672614
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):211-4
pubmed: 20682858
Acad Med. 2012 Feb;87(2):210-5
pubmed: 22189876
BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1404-5
pubmed: 9572746
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Mar;12(1):69-78
pubmed: 25648122
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1009-e1010
pubmed: 31303286
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):443-5
pubmed: 16452555
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):820-8
pubmed: 22534591
HEC Forum. 2011 Jun;23(2):105-13
pubmed: 21598049
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jul 13;4(3):null
pubmed: 27417631
Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec;37(6):21-3
pubmed: 18179101
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):633-8
pubmed: 26630608
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Winter;23(4):338-44
pubmed: 23469695
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1820-1821
pubmed: 27959658
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Dec;83(6):1178-82
pubmed: 21118918
J Glob Health. 2013 Dec;3(2):020406
pubmed: 24363924
Global Health. 2010 Oct 28;6:19
pubmed: 21029401
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Nov 14;1(3):e000097
pubmed: 28588960
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):397-404
pubmed: 24606623
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;101(1):84-7
pubmed: 18068168
Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):320-5
pubmed: 19240438
Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):317-20
pubmed: 17660105
JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1456-8
pubmed: 18812538
Global Health. 2018 Feb 07;14(1):18
pubmed: 29415740
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;55(1):17-22
pubmed: 19699557
Ann Intern Med. 2018 May 1;168(9):651-657
pubmed: 29582076
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Oct;28(5):502-8
pubmed: 23890475
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jun;30(6):1215; author reply 1215
pubmed: 21653984
J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):162-5
pubmed: 21084354
Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S53-7
pubmed: 18820502
Med Educ. 2010 Jul;44(7):683-9
pubmed: 20636587
J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct;39(10):625-31
pubmed: 23236086
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5):
pubmed: 29074610
Med Educ. 2011 Jul;45(7):704-11
pubmed: 21649703
Int J Public Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):31-42
pubmed: 27592359
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):483-7
pubmed: 23425985
Global Health. 2015 Dec 18;11:50
pubmed: 26684302