Evaluation of a bone groove geometry for fixation of a cochlear implant electrode.
Bone groove
Cochlear implant
Electrode migration
Force measurement
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
08
02
2019
accepted:
22
10
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
3
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electrode migration is a rare, but relevant complication in cochlear implant (CI) surgery. An effective countermeasure is to create a bone groove in the facial recess to secure the electrode lead. We use this method routinely since 2013, but still experienced sporadic electrode migration events most likely due to an improper surgical execution. The aim of this study was to determine the optimum groove geometry. Grooves of defined geometry were created in specimens of fresh porcine femur compacta by use of a CNC milling machine. Electrode dummies were fixed in the groove and then exposed to tensile stress. Force measurements were carried out to examine the effect of groove diameter and opening width on the holding force. The mechanical impact on the electrode cable during insertion into the groove was recorded and the electrode lead was examined under microscopic magnification to assess potential structural damage. Optimum groove geometry (diameter 1.10 mm, opening width 0.90 mm) ensured an average holding force of 830 mN which is equivalent to the established fixation by use of a titanium clip. None of the microscopic inspections revealed any morphological deterioration of the electrode lead. The fixation of a CI electrode in a bone groove in the facial recess appears to be effective and safe. Furthermore, this method does not require additional costs or foreign material. The optimum geometry defined in this study helped us to refine our surgical standard produce and to generate more consistent results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31677095
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05713-0
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05713-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
385-392Références
Tarkan O, Tuncer U, Ozdemir S et al (2013) Surgical and medical management for complications in 475 consecutive pediatric cochlear implantations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77:473–479
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.009
Causon A, Verschuur C, Newman TA (2013) Trends in cochlear implant complications: implications for improving long-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 34:259–265
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827d0943
Stolle SR, Groß S, Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A (2014) Complications in children and adults with cochlear implant. Laryngorhinootologie 93(9):605–611
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370924
Rivas A, Marlowe AL, Chinnici JE, Niparko JK, Francis HW (2008) Revision cochlear implantation surgery in adults: indications and results. Otol Neurotol 29(5):639–648
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817e5d31
Connell SS, Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Telischi FF, Angeli SI, Eshraghi AA (2008) Electrode migration after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 29:156–159
doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318157f80b
Brown KD, Connell SS, Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AE, Telischi FF, Angeli SA (2009) Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 119:152–157
doi: 10.1002/lary.20012
van der Marel KS, Verbist BM, Briaire JJ, Joemai RM, Frijns JH (2012) Electrode migration in cochlear implant patients: not an exception. Audiol Neurootol 17(5):275–281
doi: 10.1159/000338475
Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SC (2004) Revision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:429–432
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.033
Gärtner L, Würfel W, Büchner A, Lenarz T (2014) Unexpected severe degradation of speech recognition in a patient with cochlear implant. Laryngorhinootologie 93(6):398–400
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372590
Rader T, Baumann U, Stöver T et al (2016) Management of cochlear implant electrode migration. Otol Neurotol 37(9):e341–e348
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001065
Aschendorff A (2011) Imaging in cochlear implant patients. Laryngorhinootologie 90(Suppl 1):S16–21
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270448
Dirr F, Hempel JM, Krause E et al (2013) Value of routine plain X-ray position checks after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 34(9):1666–1669
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a09cc3
Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM (2000) Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 21(1):49–56
doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80075-7
Whiting BR, Bae KT, Skinner MW (2001) Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs. Radiology 221:543–549
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2212010275
Lecerf P, Bakhos D, Cottier JP, Lescanne E, Trijolet JP, Robier A (2011) Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array. Otol Neurotol 32(7):1075–1081
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318229d4dd
Colby CC, Todd NW, Harnsberger HR, Hudgins PA (2015) Standardization of CT depiction of cochlear implant insertion depth. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(2):368–371
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4105
Greenwood DD (1990) A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2592–2605
doi: 10.1121/1.399052
Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Frijns JH et al (2010) Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11:625–640
doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0222-7
Cohen NL, Kuzma J (1995) Titanium clip for cochlear implant electrode fixation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:402–403
pubmed: 7668723
Müller J, Schön F, Helms J (1998) Reliable fixation of cochlear implant electrode mountings in children and adults-initial experiences with a new titanium clip. Laryngorhinootol 77:238–240
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996968
Balkany T, Telischi FF (1995) Fixation of the electrode cable during cochlear implantation: the split bridge technique. Laryngoscope 105(2):217–218
doi: 10.1288/00005537-199502000-00022
Lenarz T, Stöver T, Buechner A et al (2006) Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiol Neurotol 11(suppl 1):34–41
doi: 10.1159/000095612
Rau TS, Majdani O, Hussong A, Lenarz T, Leinung M (2011) Determination of the curling behavior of a pre-formed cochlear implant electrode array. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(3):421–433
doi: 10.1007/s11548-010-0520-x
Lehnhardt E (1993) Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO 41(7):356–359
pubmed: 8376183
von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J et al (1999) Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 61(6):334–340
doi: 10.1159/000027695
Mittmann P, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Ernst A, Todt I (2015) Electrode migration in patients with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurootol 20(6):349–353
doi: 10.1159/000435873
Adunka O, Gstoettner W, Hambek M, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Kiefer J (2004) Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 66:306–312
doi: 10.1159/000081887
Gstöttner W, Pok SM, Peters S, Kiefer J, Adunka O (2005) Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing. HNO 53:784–790
doi: 10.1007/s00106-004-1170-5
Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV et al (2006) Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 27(8):1083–1088
doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000244355.34577.85
Leinung M, Helbig S, Adel Y, Stöver T, Loth AG (2019) The effect of a bone groove against cochlear implant electrode migration. Otol Neurotol 40(5):e511–e517. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002228
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002228
pubmed: 31083086
Office of the Surgeon General (US) (2004) Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Office of the Surgeon General (US), Rockville. 2 The Basics of Bone in Health and Disease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK45504/ . Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Alam K (2014) Experimental and numerical investigation of cracking behavior of cortical bone in cutting. Technol Health Care 22(5):741–750
doi: 10.3233/THC-140848
Pearson OM, Lieberman DE (2004) The aging of Wolff's "law": ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yearb Phys Anthropol 47:63–99
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20155
Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. 1. Aufl., Reprint (der Ausg.). Georg Bergmann und Georg Duda, Berlin, Hirschwald, Hrsg.
You L, Cowin SC, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S (2001) A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix. J Biomech 34(11):1375–1386
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00107-5