Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Bacterial Infections
/ diagnosis
Biofilms
/ drug effects
Debridement
/ methods
Female
Humans
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Pressure Ulcer
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Wound Infection
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
/ drug effects
debridement
point-of-care
wound blotting
Journal
International wound journal
ISSN: 1742-481X
Titre abrégé: Int Wound J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
30
05
2019
revised:
03
10
2019
accepted:
08
10
2019
pubmed:
5
11
2019
medline:
3
11
2020
entrez:
5
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For optimal wound bed preparation, wound debridement is essential to eliminate bacterial biofilms. However, it is challenging for clinicians to determine whether the biofilm is completely removed. A newly developed biofilm detection method based on wound blotting technology may be useful. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of biofilm elimination on wound area decrease in pressure ulcers, as confirmed using the wound blotting method. In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled patients with pressure ulcers who underwent sharp debridement with pre- and post-debridement wound blotting. Biofilm was detected on the nitrocellulose membrane using ruthenium red or alcian blue staining. Patients were included if the test was positive for biofilm before wound debridement. Percent decrease in wound area after 1 week was calculated as an outcome measure. We classified the wounds into a biofilm-eliminated group and a biofilm-remaining group based on the post-debridement wound blotting result. Sixteen wound blotting samples from nine pressure ulcers were collected. The percent decrease in wound area was significantly higher in the biofilm-eliminated group (median: 14.4%, interquartile range: 4.6%-20.1%) than in the biofilm-remaining group (median: -14.5%, interquartile range: -25.3%-9.6%; P = .040). The presence of remaining biofilms was an independent predictor for reduced percent decrease in wound area (coefficient = -22.84, P = .040). Biofilm-based wound care guided by wound blotting is a promising measure to help clinicians eliminate bacterial bioburden more effectively for wound area reduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31680469
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13256
pmc: PMC7948602
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
191-196Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 17H04455
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Mar-Apr;19(2):214-22
pubmed: 21362089
Int Wound J. 2016 Apr;13(2):189-97
pubmed: 24674027
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):131-138
pubmed: 28019691
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):473-81
pubmed: 22747950
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):838-41
pubmed: 16601046
J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:153586
pubmed: 24839608
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan;127 Suppl 1:28S-35S
pubmed: 21200270
Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):559-67
pubmed: 22092794
J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25
pubmed: 28103163
Br J Community Nurs. 2017 Jun 2;22(Sup6):S20-S25
pubmed: 28570133
Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):191-196
pubmed: 31680469
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Sep;149(9):1050-8
pubmed: 23884238
J Wound Care. 2008 Apr;17(4):145-8, 150-2, 154-5
pubmed: 18494432
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):505-517
pubmed: 30497871
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Sep;23(5):772-7
pubmed: 25976913
Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9 Suppl 2:1-19
pubmed: 23145905
Pathog Dis. 2019 Feb 1;77(1):
pubmed: 30844070
Wound Repair Regen. 2011 May-Jun;19(3):309-15
pubmed: 21539648