Molecular epidemiology of canine parvovirus type 2 in Italy from 1994 to 2017: recurrence of the CPV-2b variant.


Journal

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 06 06 2019
accepted: 16 09 2019
entrez: 6 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 13 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) is the most important enteric virus infecting canids. It is a rapidly evolving virus; after its emergence in the 1970s, new antigenic variants (called CPV-2a, 2b and 2c) emerged and replaced the original antigenic type. The three antigenic variants are globally distributed with different frequencies and levels of genetic variability. This study focused on VP2 gene sequence analysis and the phylodynamics of CPV-2 which were detected in 123 dogs showing clinical signs of gastroenteritis collected in Italy from 1994 to 2017. For the most part, the sick dogs were young, and a third of them (32.5%) had been vaccinated. No statistical association was found between the CPV-2 antigenic variants, and sex, age, breed and vaccination status. Sequence analysis showed that all three antigenic types circulated in Italy; the CPV-2a type was the prominent genotype, followed by CPV-2c and CPV-2b, with notable differences regarding regional bases and significant fluctuations over time. Nucleotide sequence data showed high genetic heterogeneity with 67 nucleotide sequence types (ntSTs) identified, corresponding to 21 amino acid sequence types (aaSTs). The aaSTs and ntSTs obtained were distributed differently among the three CPV-2 antigenic variants: CPV-2a grouped 12/21 (57.1%) aaSTs and 41/67 (61.2%) ntSTs; CPV-2b grouped 5/21 (23.8%) aaSTs and 6/67 (8.9%) ntSTs, and CPV-2c grouped 4/21 (19.1%) aaSTs and 20/67 (29.9%) ntSTs. Canine parvovirus 2a was characterised by the highest genetic variability while CPV-2c was characterised by notable stability with a predominant amino acid profile during the entire sampling time. Canine parvovirus 2b re-emerged in recent years, showing a new and distinctive amino acid profile of the VP2 protein. The findings of the present study provided new insights regarding the phylodynamics and evolution of CPV-2 in Italy, pointing out notable differences at the local level in the distribution of the CPV-2 variants and the selection of genetic subtypes. The evolution of CPV-2 has raised questions regarding the efficacy of vaccination; therefore, continuous monitoring regarding the evolution and spread of new CPV-2 variants should be a key aim of ongoing research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) is the most important enteric virus infecting canids. It is a rapidly evolving virus; after its emergence in the 1970s, new antigenic variants (called CPV-2a, 2b and 2c) emerged and replaced the original antigenic type. The three antigenic variants are globally distributed with different frequencies and levels of genetic variability. This study focused on VP2 gene sequence analysis and the phylodynamics of CPV-2 which were detected in 123 dogs showing clinical signs of gastroenteritis collected in Italy from 1994 to 2017.
RESULTS RESULTS
For the most part, the sick dogs were young, and a third of them (32.5%) had been vaccinated. No statistical association was found between the CPV-2 antigenic variants, and sex, age, breed and vaccination status. Sequence analysis showed that all three antigenic types circulated in Italy; the CPV-2a type was the prominent genotype, followed by CPV-2c and CPV-2b, with notable differences regarding regional bases and significant fluctuations over time. Nucleotide sequence data showed high genetic heterogeneity with 67 nucleotide sequence types (ntSTs) identified, corresponding to 21 amino acid sequence types (aaSTs). The aaSTs and ntSTs obtained were distributed differently among the three CPV-2 antigenic variants: CPV-2a grouped 12/21 (57.1%) aaSTs and 41/67 (61.2%) ntSTs; CPV-2b grouped 5/21 (23.8%) aaSTs and 6/67 (8.9%) ntSTs, and CPV-2c grouped 4/21 (19.1%) aaSTs and 20/67 (29.9%) ntSTs. Canine parvovirus 2a was characterised by the highest genetic variability while CPV-2c was characterised by notable stability with a predominant amino acid profile during the entire sampling time. Canine parvovirus 2b re-emerged in recent years, showing a new and distinctive amino acid profile of the VP2 protein.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The findings of the present study provided new insights regarding the phylodynamics and evolution of CPV-2 in Italy, pointing out notable differences at the local level in the distribution of the CPV-2 variants and the selection of genetic subtypes. The evolution of CPV-2 has raised questions regarding the efficacy of vaccination; therefore, continuous monitoring regarding the evolution and spread of new CPV-2 variants should be a key aim of ongoing research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31684949
doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2096-1
pii: 10.1186/s12917-019-2096-1
pmc: PMC6829998
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

393

Références

Viral Immunol. 2017 Jun;30(5):371-376
pubmed: 28414634
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302
pubmed: 29029172
Arch Virol. 2014 May;159(5):1239-47
pubmed: 24212889
Res Vet Sci. 2013 Apr;94(2):368-71
pubmed: 23063259
Vet Microbiol. 2015 Oct 22;180(1-2):1-9
pubmed: 26249827
Virology. 2000 Dec 5;278(1):13-9
pubmed: 11112475
J Gen Virol. 2016 Sep;97(9):2043-2057
pubmed: 27389721
Virus Evol. 2018 Jun 08;4(1):vey016
pubmed: 29942656
J Vet Med Sci. 2008 Jul;70(7):719-22
pubmed: 18685246
Syst Biol. 2012 Jan;61(1):170-3
pubmed: 21963610
J Virol. 1991 Dec;65(12):6544-52
pubmed: 1942246
J Gen Virol. 2008 Sep;89(Pt 9):2280-9
pubmed: 18753238
J Virol Methods. 2006 Apr;133(1):92-9
pubmed: 16313976
Virology. 1996 Jan 15;215(2):186-9
pubmed: 8560765
Arch Virol. 2017 Nov;162(11):3481-3486
pubmed: 28707272
Vet Rec. 2009 May 9;164(19):593-5
pubmed: 19429938
Arch Virol. 2004 Nov;149(11):2261-9
pubmed: 15503211
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Mar;58:50-55
pubmed: 29253672
Epidemiol Infect. 1998 Oct;121(2):433-40
pubmed: 9825797
Vet Microbiol. 2006 Oct 5;117(1):9-13
pubmed: 16765539
Virology. 2009 Mar 1;385(1):5-10
pubmed: 19144369
J Gen Virol. 2001 Dec;82(Pt 12):3021-5
pubmed: 11714979
Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Apr;23:1-6
pubmed: 24486948
J Virol. 2009 Jun;83(11):5556-66
pubmed: 19321620
Virus Res. 2011 Apr;157(1):106-10
pubmed: 21354224
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Dec;45(12):4044-7
pubmed: 17928423
J Virol. 1992 Dec;66(12):6858-67
pubmed: 1331498
Virology. 2006 Aug 15;352(1):22-6
pubmed: 16822535
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Feb 24;155(1):1-12
pubmed: 21962408
J Vet Med Sci. 2008 Aug;70(8):769-75
pubmed: 18772550
J Virol. 2011 Aug;85(15):7892-9
pubmed: 21593180
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Dec;66:171-179
pubmed: 30257188
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):379-84
pubmed: 15626758
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0175035
pubmed: 28362831
Vaccine. 2007 Jan 26;25(7):1161-6
pubmed: 17092616
Virology. 1993 Jun;194(2):491-508
pubmed: 8503170
Vet Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(6):39
pubmed: 20152105
J Virol. 2015 Oct 28;90(2):753-67
pubmed: 26512077
Infect Genet Evol. 2018 Jul;61:67-73
pubmed: 29548803
Virus Res. 2002 Feb 26;83(1-2):149-57
pubmed: 11864747
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;13(8):1222-4
pubmed: 17953097
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Sep 27;166(1-2):214-9
pubmed: 23850438
Syst Biol. 2019 Nov 1;68(6):1052-1061
pubmed: 31034053
J Gen Virol. 2001 Jul;82(Pt 7):1555-60
pubmed: 11413365
Arch Virol. 2013 Jun;158(6):1133-41
pubmed: 23297117
Res Vet Sci. 1993 Jul;55(1):60-3
pubmed: 8397433
Vet Res. 2011 Mar 02;42:43
pubmed: 21366901
J Gen Virol. 2008 Sep;89(Pt 9):2290-8
pubmed: 18753239

Auteurs

Mara Battilani (M)

Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, BO, Italy. mara.battilani@unibo.it.

Francesco Modugno (F)

Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, BO, Italy.

Francesco Mira (F)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.

Giuseppa Purpari (G)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.

Santina Di Bella (S)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.

Annalisa Guercio (A)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia "A. Mirri", Palermo, Italy.

Andrea Balboni (A)

Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, BO, Italy.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH