Influence of external contextual factors on the implementation of health and social care interventions into practice within or across countries-a protocol for a 'best fit' framework synthesis.

Context Diffusion Framework Healthcare Implementation Innovation Scale-up Social care Spread Theory ‘Best fit’ synthesis

Journal

Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 24 07 2018
accepted: 06 10 2019
entrez: 6 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 25 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The widespread implementation of interventions is often hindered by a decline and variability in effectiveness across implementation sites. It is anticipated that variations in the characteristics of the external context in different sites, such as the political and funding environment, socio-cultural context, physical environment or population demographics can influence implementation outcome. However, there is only a limited understanding about which and how external contextual factors influence implementation. We aim to develop a comprehensive framework conceptualising the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The review will use the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach. In the first stage of the review, we will examine existing frameworks, models, concepts and theories on external contextual factors and their influence on implementation from a variety of sectors and disciplines including health and social care, education, environmental studies and international development fields. The resulting a priori meta-framework will be tested and refined in the second review stage by analysing evidence from empirical studies focusing on the implementation of health and social care interventions within or across countries. Searches will be conducted in bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, ERIC, HMIC and IBSS, grey literature sources and on relevant websites. We will also search reference lists, relevant journals, perform citation searches and ask experts in the field. There is no restriction to study type, setting, intervention type or implementation strategy to enable obtaining a broad and in-depth knowledge from various sources of evidence. The review will lead to a comprehensive framework for understanding the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The framework is anticipated to help identify factors explaining the decline and variability in effectiveness of interventions and assessing the prospects of implementation effectiveness, when spreading interventions. We do not intend to only develop another stand-alone implementation framework but one that can be used in conjunction with existing frameworks. The framework can be honed and validated in future empirical research. PROSPERO CRD42018084485.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The widespread implementation of interventions is often hindered by a decline and variability in effectiveness across implementation sites. It is anticipated that variations in the characteristics of the external context in different sites, such as the political and funding environment, socio-cultural context, physical environment or population demographics can influence implementation outcome. However, there is only a limited understanding about which and how external contextual factors influence implementation. We aim to develop a comprehensive framework conceptualising the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries.
METHODS
The review will use the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach. In the first stage of the review, we will examine existing frameworks, models, concepts and theories on external contextual factors and their influence on implementation from a variety of sectors and disciplines including health and social care, education, environmental studies and international development fields. The resulting a priori meta-framework will be tested and refined in the second review stage by analysing evidence from empirical studies focusing on the implementation of health and social care interventions within or across countries. Searches will be conducted in bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, ERIC, HMIC and IBSS, grey literature sources and on relevant websites. We will also search reference lists, relevant journals, perform citation searches and ask experts in the field. There is no restriction to study type, setting, intervention type or implementation strategy to enable obtaining a broad and in-depth knowledge from various sources of evidence.
DISCUSSION
The review will lead to a comprehensive framework for understanding the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The framework is anticipated to help identify factors explaining the decline and variability in effectiveness of interventions and assessing the prospects of implementation effectiveness, when spreading interventions. We do not intend to only develop another stand-alone implementation framework but one that can be used in conjunction with existing frameworks. The framework can be honed and validated in future empirical research.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018084485.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31685025
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1180-8
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1180-8
pmc: PMC6827205
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

258

Références

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37
pubmed: 23497061
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 18;16:21
pubmed: 26891718
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70
pubmed: 23786847
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Sep;32(3):220-35
pubmed: 26095232
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1425-34
pubmed: 22865107
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20
pubmed: 20829724
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 4;16(1):88
pubmed: 30176894
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23
pubmed: 21197565
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8
pubmed: 26306609
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):500-59
pubmed: 21166868
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):209
pubmed: 29580251
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81
pubmed: 22594758

Auteurs

Alexandra Ziemann (A)

Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research (CHIR), City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK. alexandra.ziemann@city.ac.uk.
King's Improvement Science and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London, PO28, David Goldberg Centre, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. alexandra.ziemann@city.ac.uk.

Louise Brown (L)

Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, 3 East, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Euan Sadler (E)

King's Improvement Science and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London, PO28, David Goldberg Centre, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Josephine Ocloo (J)

Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and NIHR CLAHRC South London, PO 28, David Goldberg Centre, 16 De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Annette Boaz (A)

Kingston University and St. George's, University of London and NIHR CLAHRC South London, 6th Floor, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.

Jane Sandall (J)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Science, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London and NIHR CLAHRC South London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH