Influence of external contextual factors on the implementation of health and social care interventions into practice within or across countries-a protocol for a 'best fit' framework synthesis.
Context
Diffusion
Framework
Healthcare
Implementation
Innovation
Scale-up
Social care
Spread
Theory
‘Best fit’ synthesis
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Nov 2019
04 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
24
07
2018
accepted:
06
10
2019
entrez:
6
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The widespread implementation of interventions is often hindered by a decline and variability in effectiveness across implementation sites. It is anticipated that variations in the characteristics of the external context in different sites, such as the political and funding environment, socio-cultural context, physical environment or population demographics can influence implementation outcome. However, there is only a limited understanding about which and how external contextual factors influence implementation. We aim to develop a comprehensive framework conceptualising the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The review will use the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach. In the first stage of the review, we will examine existing frameworks, models, concepts and theories on external contextual factors and their influence on implementation from a variety of sectors and disciplines including health and social care, education, environmental studies and international development fields. The resulting a priori meta-framework will be tested and refined in the second review stage by analysing evidence from empirical studies focusing on the implementation of health and social care interventions within or across countries. Searches will be conducted in bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, ERIC, HMIC and IBSS, grey literature sources and on relevant websites. We will also search reference lists, relevant journals, perform citation searches and ask experts in the field. There is no restriction to study type, setting, intervention type or implementation strategy to enable obtaining a broad and in-depth knowledge from various sources of evidence. The review will lead to a comprehensive framework for understanding the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The framework is anticipated to help identify factors explaining the decline and variability in effectiveness of interventions and assessing the prospects of implementation effectiveness, when spreading interventions. We do not intend to only develop another stand-alone implementation framework but one that can be used in conjunction with existing frameworks. The framework can be honed and validated in future empirical research. PROSPERO CRD42018084485.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The widespread implementation of interventions is often hindered by a decline and variability in effectiveness across implementation sites. It is anticipated that variations in the characteristics of the external context in different sites, such as the political and funding environment, socio-cultural context, physical environment or population demographics can influence implementation outcome. However, there is only a limited understanding about which and how external contextual factors influence implementation. We aim to develop a comprehensive framework conceptualising the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries.
METHODS
The review will use the 'best fit' framework synthesis approach. In the first stage of the review, we will examine existing frameworks, models, concepts and theories on external contextual factors and their influence on implementation from a variety of sectors and disciplines including health and social care, education, environmental studies and international development fields. The resulting a priori meta-framework will be tested and refined in the second review stage by analysing evidence from empirical studies focusing on the implementation of health and social care interventions within or across countries. Searches will be conducted in bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, ERIC, HMIC and IBSS, grey literature sources and on relevant websites. We will also search reference lists, relevant journals, perform citation searches and ask experts in the field. There is no restriction to study type, setting, intervention type or implementation strategy to enable obtaining a broad and in-depth knowledge from various sources of evidence.
DISCUSSION
The review will lead to a comprehensive framework for understanding the influence of external contextual factors on implementation, particularly when spreading health and social care interventions within or across countries. The framework is anticipated to help identify factors explaining the decline and variability in effectiveness of interventions and assessing the prospects of implementation effectiveness, when spreading interventions. We do not intend to only develop another stand-alone implementation framework but one that can be used in conjunction with existing frameworks. The framework can be honed and validated in future empirical research.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018084485.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31685025
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1180-8
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1180-8
pmc: PMC6827205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
258Références
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 13;13:37
pubmed: 23497061
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 18;16:21
pubmed: 26891718
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70
pubmed: 23786847
Health Info Libr J. 2015 Sep;32(3):220-35
pubmed: 26095232
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1425-34
pubmed: 22865107
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20
pubmed: 20829724
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 4;16(1):88
pubmed: 30176894
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23
pubmed: 21197565
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8
pubmed: 26306609
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Milbank Q. 2010 Dec;88(4):500-59
pubmed: 21166868
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):209
pubmed: 29580251
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81
pubmed: 22594758