Mortality Risk Associated With Personality Facets of the Big Five and Interpersonal Circumplex Across Three Aging Cohorts.
Journal
Psychosomatic medicine
ISSN: 1534-7796
Titre abrégé: Psychosom Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376505
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
6
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To address the common reliance on the global Big Five domains in the personality and longevity literature, the present study examined mortality risk associated with subdimensions of Big Five domains as well as specific traits within the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) model of personality. Data were drawn from three major longitudinal studies of aging that administered the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, a comprehensive measure of the Big Five, and comprised a total of 4223 participants. Item Response Theory models were used to generate latent trait scores for each of the 30 Big Five facets and eight scales from the IPC. Pooled mortality risk estimates were obtained from demographic-adjusted Cox regression models within each study. With a high degree of consistency, the vulnerability facet of neuroticism was associated with higher mortality risk and the activity facet of extraversion, with lower risk. None of the openness or agreeableness facets were associated with mortality, although the IPC scales submissiveness and hostile submissiveness were linked with elevated risk. All but one of the facets in the conscientiousness domain were robustly and consistently associated with lower mortality risk. Findings indicate that specific facets of neuroticism and extraversion carry greater or lesser mortality risk. Broad composite scales averaging across all facets mask important personality risk factors. In contrast, nearly all facets within the conscientiousness domain confer protection against mortality. Finally, the IPC model may capture more nuanced interpersonal risk factors than the facets of Big Five agreeableness or extraversion. Understanding of the role of personality in longevity requires a more precise approach to conceptualization and measurement than broad, composite constructs usually provide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31688676
doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000756
pii: 00006842-202001000-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64-73Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG010569
Pays : United States
Références
Chapman BP, Roberts B, Duberstein P. Personality and longevity: knowns, unknowns, and implications for public health and personalized medicine. J Aging Res 2011;2011:1–24.
Strickhouser JE, Zell E, Krizan Z. Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychol 2017;36:797–810.
Jokela M, Batty GD, Nyberg ST, Virtanen M, Nabi H, Singh-Manoux A, Kivimäki M. Personality and all-cause mortality: individual-participant meta-analysis of 3,947 deaths in 76,150 adults. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:667–75.
Mõttus R. Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. Eur J Pers 2016;30:289–320.
Chapman BP. The role of personality traits in health outcomes. Eur J Pers 2016;30:325–6.
Chapman BP. Invited commentary: personality phenotype and mortality: new avenues in genetic, social, and clinical epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:676–8.
Weiss A, Costa PT. Closing the door too soon? Comment on “Personality and all-cause mortality: individual-participant meta-analysis of 3,947 deaths in 76,150 adults” by Jokela, Batty, Nyberg, Virtanen, Nabi, Singh-Manoux, and Kivimaki. Am J Epidemiol 2013.
Jokela M, Pulkki-Råback L, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M. Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: pooled analysis of three cohort studies. J Behav Med 2014;37:881–9.
Chida Y, Steptoe A. The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: a meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:936–46.
Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol Bull 2004;130:887–919.
Costa PT Jr, Weiss A, Duberstein PR, Friedman B, Siegler IC. Personality facets and all-cause mortality among medicare patients aged 66 to 102 years: a follow-on study of Weiss and Costa (2005). Psychosom Med 2014;76:370–8.
Jonassaint CR, Boyle SH, Williams RB, Mark DB, Siegler IC, Barefoot JC. Facets of openness predict mortality in patients with cardiac disease. Psychosom Med 2007;69:319–22.
Turiano NA, Spiro A III, Mroczek DK. Openness to experience and mortality in men: analysis of trait and facets. J Aging Health 2012;24:654–72.
Smith TW. Personality as risk and resilience in physical health. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2006;15:227–31.
Luciano M, Lopez LM, de Moor MH, Harris SE, Davies G, Nutile T, Krueger RF, Esko T, Schlessinger D, Toshiko T, Derringer JL, Realo A, Hansell NK, Pergadia ML, Pesonen AK, Sanna S, Terracciano A, Madden PA, Penninx B, Spinhoven P, Hartman CA, Oostra BA, Janssens AC, Eriksson JG, Starr JM, Cannas A, Ferrucci L, Metspalu A, Wright MJ, Heath AC, van Duijn CM, Bierut LJ, Raikkonen K, Martin NG, Ciullo M, Rujescu D, Boomsma DI, Deary IJ. Longevity candidate genes and their association with personality traits in the elderly. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2012;159B:192–200.
Hofstee WK, de Raad B, Goldberg LR. Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992;63:146–63.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;56:586–95.
Traupman EK, Smith TW, Uchino BN, Berg CA, Trobst KK, Costa PT Jr. Interpersonal circumplex octant, control, and affiliation scales for the NEO-PI-R. Pers Individ Diff 2009;47:457–63.
Gallo LC, Smith TW, Cox CM. Socioeconomic status, psychosocial processes, and perceived health: an interpersonal perspective. Ann Behav Med 2006;31:109–19.
Smith TW, Uchino BN, Berg CA, Florsheim P, Pearce G, Hawkins M, Henry NJ, Beveridge RM, Skinner MA, Hopkins PN, Yoon HC. Associations of self-reports versus spouse ratings of negative affectivity, dominance, and affiliation with coronary artery disease: where should we look and who should we ask when studying personality and health? Health Psychol 2008;27:676–84.
Siegman AW, Kubzansky LD, Kawachi I, Boyle S, Vokonas PS, Sparrow D. A prospective study of dominance and coronary heart disease in the Normative Aging Study. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:145–9.
Terracciano A, Lockenhoff CE, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, Costa PT Jr. Personality predictors of longevity: activity, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. Psychosom Med 2008;70:621–7.
Houston BK, Babyak MA, Chesney MA, Black G, Ragland DR. Social dominance and 22-year all-cause mortality in men. Psychosom Med 1997;59:5–12.
Hofer SM, Piccinin AM. Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods 2009;14:150–64.
Curran PJ, Hussong AM. Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychol Methods 2009;14:81–100.
Terracciano A, McCrae RR, Brant LJ, Costa PT Jr. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Psychol Aging 2005;20:493–506.
Schaie KW, Willis SL, Caskie GI. The Seattle longitudinal study: relationship between personality and cognition. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2004;11:304–24.
Graham EK, Rutsohn JP, Turiano NA, Bendayan R, Batterham PJ, Gerstorf D, Katz MJ, Reynolds CA, Sharp ES, Yoneda TB, Bastarache ED, Elleman LG, Zelinski EM, Johansson B, Kuh D, Barnes LL, Bennett DA, Deeg DJH, Lipton RB, Pedersen NL, Piccinin AM, Spiro A 3rd, Muniz-Terrera G, Willis SL, Schaie KW, Roan C, Herd P, Hofer SM, Mroczek DK. Personality predicts mortality risk: an integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies. J Res Pers 2017;70:174–86.
Costa PT, MacCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment; 1992.
Bauer DJ, Hussong AM. Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: traditional and new models. Psychol Methods 2009;14:101–25.
Dorans NJ, Schmitt AP, Bleistein CA. The standardization approach to assessing comprehensive differential item functioning. J Educ Meas 1992;29:309–19.
Cummings P. Methods for estimating adjusted risk ratios. Stata J 2009;9:175–96.
Duan-Porter W, Hastings SN, Neelon B, Van Houtven CH. Control beliefs and risk for death, stroke and myocardial infarction in middle-aged and older adults: an observational study. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1156–63.
Angst F, Stassen HH, Clayton PJ, Angst J. Mortality of patients with mood disorders: follow-up over 34-38 years. J Affect Disord 2002;68:167–81.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect influence health? Psychol Bull 2005;131:925–71.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five Factor Inventory: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment; 1992.
Ashton MC, Lee K, Vernon PA, Jang KL. Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the openness/intellect factor. J Res Pers 2000;34:198–207.
Deary IJ, Johnson W. Intelligence and education: causal perceptions drive analytic processes and therefore conclusions. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:1362–9.
Chapman BP, Elliot A. Brief report: how short is too short? An ultra-brief measure of the big-five personality domains implicates “agreeableness” as a risk for all-cause mortality. J Health Psychol 2019;24:1568–73.
Smith TW, Traupman EK, Uchino BN, Berg CA. Interpersonal circumplex descriptions of psychosocial risk factors for physical illness: application to hostility, neuroticism, and marital adjustment. J Pers 2010;78:1011–36.
Gallo LC, Smith TW. Construct validation of health-relevant personality traits: interpersonal circumplex and five-factor model analyses of the Aggression Questionnaire. Int J Behav Med 1998;5:129–47.