Effect of Caspofungin vs Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Invasive Fungal Disease Among Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Antifungal Agents
/ adverse effects
Aspergillosis
/ epidemiology
Caspofungin
/ adverse effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Early Termination of Clinical Trials
Female
Fluconazole
/ adverse effects
Humans
Infant
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
/ complications
Male
Mycoses
/ prevention & control
Neutropenia
/ complications
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 11 2019
05 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
11
2019
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Children, adolescents, and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia are at high risk of life-threatening invasive fungal disease with both yeasts and molds. To compare the efficacy of caspofungin vs fluconazole prophylaxis against proven or probable invasive fungal disease and invasive aspergillosis during neutropenia following acute myeloid leukemia chemotherapy. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial enrolled patients aged 3 months to 30 years with newly diagnosed de novo, relapsed, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia being treated at 115 US and Canadian institutions (April 2011-November 2016; last follow-up June 30, 2018). Participants were randomly assigned during the first chemotherapy cycle to prophylaxis with caspofungin (n = 257) or fluconazole (n = 260). Prophylaxis was administered during the neutropenic period following each chemotherapy cycle. The primary outcome was proven or probable invasive fungal disease as adjudicated by blinded central review. Secondary outcomes were invasive aspergillosis, empirical antifungal therapy, and overall survival. The second interim efficacy analysis and an unplanned futility analysis based on 394 patients appeared to have suggested futility, so the study was closed to accrual. Among the 517 participants who were randomized (median age, 9 years [range, 0-26 years]; 44% female), 508 (98%) completed the trial. The 23 proven or probable invasive fungal disease events (6 caspofungin vs 17 fluconazole) included 14 molds, 7 yeasts, and 2 fungi not further categorized. The 5-month cumulative incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal disease was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.3%-7.0%) in the caspofungin group vs 7.2% (95% CI, 4.4%-11.8%) in the fluconazole group (overall P = .03 by log-rank test) and for cumulative incidence of proven or probable invasive aspergillosis was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.5%) with caspofungin vs 3.1% (95% CI, 1.4%-6.9%) with fluconazole (overall P = .046 by log-rank test). No statistically significant differences in empirical antifungal therapy (71.9% caspofungin vs 69.5% fluconazole, overall P = .78 by log-rank test) or 2-year overall survival (68.8% caspofungin vs 70.8% fluconazole, overall P = .66 by log-rank test) were observed. The most common toxicities were hypokalemia (22 caspofungin vs 13 fluconazole), respiratory failure (6 caspofungin vs 9 fluconazole), and elevated alanine transaminase (4 caspofungin vs 8 fluconazole). Among children, adolescents, and young adults with acute myeloid leukemia, prophylaxis with caspofungin compared with fluconazole resulted in significantly lower incidence of invasive fungal disease. The findings suggest that caspofungin may be considered for prophylaxis against invasive fungal disease, although study interpretation is limited by early termination due to an unplanned interim analysis that appeared to have suggested futility. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01307579.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31688884
pii: 2753898
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15702
pmc: PMC6865545
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifungal Agents
0
Fluconazole
8VZV102JFY
Caspofungin
F0XDI6ZL63
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01307579']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1673-1681Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K12 CA090625
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180886
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180899
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189955
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Stat Med. 2017 Apr 30;36(9):1506-1518
pubmed: 28183155
Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123(3):877-84
pubmed: 19255017
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59
pubmed: 17251531
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Dec;28(12):1132-5
pubmed: 19779392
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):e56-93
pubmed: 21258094
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0212837
pubmed: 30913226
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):e604-10
pubmed: 26678213
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Dec;27(12):1099-102
pubmed: 19057369
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 15;46(12):1813-21
pubmed: 18462102
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4 Suppl):209S-221S
pubmed: 2605969
Clin Trials. 2011 Jun;8(3):270-6
pubmed: 21441286
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10;30(35):4427-38
pubmed: 22987086
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1419-1426
pubmed: 28184431
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 1;41(9):1232-9
pubmed: 16206095
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Dec;38(6):540-4
pubmed: 21925846
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Mar;61(3):393-400
pubmed: 24424789
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55(12):1608-14
pubmed: 22955431
Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1100-8
pubmed: 19156894
Blood. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):3532-9
pubmed: 17660380
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e711-6
pubmed: 16533892
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2015 Dec;4(4):313-22
pubmed: 26582870