Diagnostic accuracy of b800 and b1500 DWI-MRI of the pelvis to detect residual rectal adenocarcinoma: a multi-reader study.
Chemoradiation
Diffusion weighted imaging
MRI
Rectal cancer
b value
Journal
Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
14
1
2021
entrez:
7
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the sensitivity, specificity and intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) b800 and b1500 s/mm Detection of residual adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant CRT for LARC has become increasingly important and relies on both MRI and endoscopic surveillance. Optimal MRI diffusion b values have yet to be established for this clinical purpose. From our MRI database between 2018 and 2019, we identified a cohort of 28 patients after exclusions who underwent MRI of the rectum before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation with a protocol that included both b800 and b1500 s/mm Within the cohort, 19/28 (67.9%) had residual tumor, while 9/28 (32.1%) had a complete response. Among four readers, one reader had increased sensitivity for detection of residual tumor at b1500 s/mm Aside from one reader demonstrating increased sensitivity, no significant difference in accuracy parameters or inter-observer agreement was found between MR using b800 and b1500 for the detection of residual tumor after neoadjuvant CRT for LARC. However, there was a suggestion of a trend towards increased sensitivity with b1500, and further studies using larger cohorts may be needed to further investigate this topic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31690966
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02283-x
pii: 10.1007/s00261-019-02283-x
pmc: PMC7386086
mid: NIHMS1572873
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
293-300Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Jul 18;3:145-52
pubmed: 27489868
Cancer Imaging. 2014 Apr 22;14:11
pubmed: 25608450
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Oct 21;60(20):7877-91
pubmed: 26406921
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W205-W216
pubmed: 30240291
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Apr;12(4):513-9
pubmed: 24717570
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):418-428
pubmed: 27253423
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):711-7; discussion 717-8
pubmed: 15383798
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3873-80
pubmed: 26198074
Minerva Chir. 2018 Dec;73(6):601-618
pubmed: 29795066
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Nov;44(11):3664-3673
pubmed: 31004202
Acta Radiol. 2014 Jun;55(5):532-42
pubmed: 23982322
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Nov;113(2):158-65
pubmed: 25483833
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):45-50
pubmed: 18158403
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jan;45(1):125-131
pubmed: 27383502
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8496
pubmed: 28819296
Prostate Cancer. 2014;2014:868269
pubmed: 24693438
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1324-1329
pubmed: 28363512
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1848-1857
pubmed: 27631106
Clin Imaging. 2018 Jan - Feb;47:90-95
pubmed: 28917137
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 23;15:767
pubmed: 26497495
Radiographics. 2019 Mar-Apr;39(2):367-387
pubmed: 30768361
Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2962-70
pubmed: 25038851
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1465-1475
pubmed: 29043428
Korean J Radiol. 2013 Jan-Feb;14(1):61-9
pubmed: 23323032