Association of Sex With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Coronary Artery Disease
/ therapy
Drug-Eluting Stents
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
/ adverse effects
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Hemorrhagic Stroke
/ chemically induced
Humans
Ischemic Stroke
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Myocardial Infarction
/ epidemiology
Myocardial Revascularization
/ statistics & numerical data
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ methods
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Proportional Hazards Models
Secondary Prevention
Sex Factors
Thrombosis
/ epidemiology
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2020
01 01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
11
2019
medline:
12
1
2021
entrez:
7
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Women experience worse ischemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To assess the association of sex with patient outcomes at 2 years after contemporary PCI and with the efficacy and safety of 2 antiplatelet strategies. This study is a prespecified subgroup analysis of the investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study evaluating 2 strategies of antiplatelet therapy after PCI in an unselected population including 130 secondary/tertiary care hospitals in different countries. The main study enrolled 15 991 unselected patients undergoing PCI between July 2013 and November 2015. Patients had an outpatient clinic visit at 30 days and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the index procedure. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2019. Eligible patients were randomized to either the experimental or reference antiplatelet strategy. Experimental strategy consisted of 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy, while the reference strategy comprised of 12 months of DAPT followed by 12 months of aspirin monotherapy. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and new Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. The secondary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding. Of the 15 968 patients included in this study, 3714 (23.3%) were women. The risk of the primary end point at 2 years was similar between women and men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20). Compared with men, women had higher risk of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding (adjusted HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67) and hemorrhagic stroke at 2 years (adjusted HR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.92-11.81). At 2 years, there was no between-sex difference in the efficacy and safety of the 2 antiplatelet strategies. At 1 year, compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of bleeding in men (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98) but not in women (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.80-1.89; P for interaction = .045). Compared with men, women experienced a higher risk of bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke after PCI. The effect of 2 antiplatelet strategies on death and Q-wave myocardial infarction following PCI did not differ between the sexes at 2 years. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813435.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31693078
pii: 2753538
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4296
pmc: PMC7029729
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01813435']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21-29Références
EuroIntervention. 2016 Jun 12;12(2):e216-23
pubmed: 25539416
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2648-2662
pubmed: 26670066
Circulation. 2012 Oct 30;126(18):2190-9
pubmed: 22988009
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 10;361(11):1045-57
pubmed: 19717846
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007434
pubmed: 30608869
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):629-637
pubmed: 27152497
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5):
pubmed: 28495897
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2001-15
pubmed: 17982182
BMJ. 2011 Jun 17;342:d3527
pubmed: 21685437
Neth Heart J. 2011 Nov;19(11):451-7
pubmed: 21901505
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May;11(5):e006132
pubmed: 29748219
EuroIntervention. 2015 May;11(1):68-74
pubmed: 25982650
Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 7;37(42):3232-3245
pubmed: 27523477
Lancet. 2013 Dec 7;382(9908):1879-88
pubmed: 24007976
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep 12;9(17):1780-9
pubmed: 27544007
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3124-3134
pubmed: 29020367
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1461-9
pubmed: 27478113
Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1025-1034
pubmed: 28290994
Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 1;35(33):2213-23b
pubmed: 25024407
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51
pubmed: 17470709
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260
pubmed: 28886622
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 17;67(19):2224-2234
pubmed: 27079334
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 14;39(23):2192-2207
pubmed: 29897428
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949
pubmed: 30166073
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jan 14;38(3):165-171
pubmed: 28158545
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2097-8
pubmed: 24240937
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 15;85(3):359-68
pubmed: 25115966
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):301-10
pubmed: 22440496
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 May;14(5):294-303
pubmed: 28181585
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 28;69(12):1549-1559
pubmed: 28335837
Heart. 2016 Jul 15;102(14):1142-9
pubmed: 27126397