Secondary 12-Month Ocular Outcomes of a Phase 1 Dosing Study of Bevacizumab for Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Amblyopia
/ physiopathology
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gestational Age
Humans
Hyperopia
/ physiopathology
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Myopia, Degenerative
/ physiopathology
Nystagmus, Pathologic
/ physiopathology
Prospective Studies
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Retinopathy of Prematurity
/ diagnosis
Retinoscopy
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2020
01 01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
8
11
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
8
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lower bevacizumab dosages are being used for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity, but there are limited data on long-term ocular outcomes with lower doses. To evaluate ocular outcomes at 12 months' corrected age for eyes that received a dose of 0.625 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.125 mg, 0.063 mg, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. This prospective cohort study used a masked, multicenter, phase 1 dose de-escalation study design and was conducted from April 2016 to October 2017. Study eyes were treated with a dose of 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, or 0.031 mg of bevacizumab; fellow eyes were treated with a dosage 1 level higher than the study eye. Additional treatment after 4 weeks was at investigator discretion. Data analysis occurred from November 2018 to March 2019. Intravitreous bevacizumab injections of 0.625 mg to 0.031 mg. Visual fixation, amblyopia, alignment, nystagmus, cycloplegic refraction, and ocular examinations were assessed at 12 months' corrected age as preplanned secondary outcomes. The primary outcome 4 weeks after treatment and secondary outcomes after 6 months' corrected age have been previously reported. Forty-six of 61 infants (75%) had a 12-month follow-up examination (46 study eyes and 43 fellow eyes; median [interquartile range] birth weight, 650 [590-760] g). Of 87 eyes with a cycloplegic refraction, 12 (14% [95% CI, 7%-27%]) had myopia of more than -5.00 D spherical equivalent; 2 (2%; [95% CI, 0%-8%]) had hyperopia greater than 5.00 D spherical equivalent; and 5 infants (11% [95% CI, 4%-24%]) had anisometropia greater than 1.50 D spherical equivalent. Abnormalities of the cornea, lens, or anterior segment were reported in 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]), 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), and 3 eyes (3% [95% CI, 1%-10%]), respectively. Optic nerve atrophy was identified in 11 eyes (13% [95% CI, 6%-26%]), and 1 eye (1% [95% CI, 0%-6%]) had total retinal detachment. Strabismus was reported in 13 infants (30% [95% CI, 17%-45%]), manifest nystagmus in 7 infants (15% [95% CI, 6%-29%]), and amblyopia in 3 infants (7% [95% CI, 1%-18%]). Overall, 98% of infants had central fixation in each eye (44 of 45 eyes). In this study of low-dose bevacizumab, the secondary outcomes of high myopia, strabismus, retinal detachment, nystagmus, and other ocular abnormalities at 1 year were consistent with rates reported in other studies with higher dosages. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02390531.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31697304
pii: 2753931
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4488
pmc: PMC6865236
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
VEGFA protein, human
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02390531']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14-20Références
Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):1008-15
pubmed: 25687024
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;155(6):1119-1124.e1
pubmed: 23490192
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 17;364(7):603-15
pubmed: 21323540
J AAPOS. 2011 Dec;15(6):536-40
pubmed: 22153396
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):663-71
pubmed: 20385926
Ophthalmology. 2018 Dec;125(12):1961-1966
pubmed: 29887334
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1145-51
pubmed: 21211840
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):654-656
pubmed: 28448664
Early Hum Dev. 2008 Feb;84(2):77-82
pubmed: 18234457
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;121(12):1684-94
pubmed: 14662586
Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5):576-80
pubmed: 2062488
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;98(4):507-12
pubmed: 24403566
Eye (Lond). 2014 Sep;28(9):1080-6; quiz 1087
pubmed: 25104736