Higher early proximal migration of hemispherical cups with electrochemically applied hydroxyapatite (BoneMaster) on a porous surface compared with porous surface alone: a randomized RSA study with 53 patients.
Journal
Acta orthopaedica
ISSN: 1745-3682
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101231512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
9
11
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
entrez:
9
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background and purpose - BoneMaster (BM) is an electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite (HA) implant-coating, which is evenly distributed, thin, and quickly resorbed. It is designed to stimulate osseointegration and early implant stability and alleviate longer-term HA-induced third-body polyethylene wear. This study evaluates early cup migration and functional outcomes of cementless porous-coated hemispherical cups with or without BM.Patients and methods - In a patient-blinded, randomized, controlled trial 53 patients at mean 64 years (55-75) with coxarthritis were operated with an Exceed cup (Zimmer Biomet) and Bi-Metric stem (Zimmer Biomet) with porous and BM coating (PBM) or with porous coating alone (P). Follow-ups were performed postoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Effect measures were cup migration measured with RSA and PROMs.Results - At 6-month follow-up, proximal cup migration in the PBM group (0.09 mm, 95% CI 0.02-0.20) was higher than in the P group (0.25 mm, CI 0.15-0.35). At 1- and 2-year follow-up, cup migration in all 6 degrees of freedom was similar between groups (p > 0.2). From before surgery to 2-year follow-up, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) increased by 17 points (CI 14-20). Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) increased in all sub-scores, but was more pronounced for PBM cups compared with P cups in the Symptoms sub-score (p = 0.04).Interpretation - Contrary to expectations, PBM cups had higher early migration than P cups. At 2-year follow-up, migration was similar between groups. There seems to be no early benefit of BM coating on acetabular cups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31698977
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1687860
pmc: PMC7008237
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Durapatite
91D9GV0Z28
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26-32Références
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3412-3420
pubmed: 28641972
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):321-4
pubmed: 21504344
Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):823-32
pubmed: 25338110
Bone Joint Res. 2012 Sep 01;1(9):225-33
pubmed: 23610695
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jan 28;10:21
pubmed: 25626520
J Orthop. 2017 Jul 21;14(4):454-460
pubmed: 28819343
Hip Int. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):155-66
pubmed: 24500826
Acta Orthop. 2014 Feb;85(1):39-48
pubmed: 24286564
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8):962-71
pubmed: 15586331
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91
pubmed: 23126575
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 Mar 1;92(3):913-21
pubmed: 19291683
Acta Orthop. 2016 Feb;87(1):48-54
pubmed: 26569616
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:62-5
pubmed: 22262426
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):20-32
pubmed: 991504
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):156-61
pubmed: 26260783
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Dec;25(12):1980-1987
pubmed: 28802851
J Orthop Res. 1992 Mar;10(2):285-99
pubmed: 1311039
Bone Joint Res. 2014 Jan 13;3(1):7-13
pubmed: 24421318
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Oct 3;100(19):1673-1681
pubmed: 30277997
Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72
pubmed: 16195075
Acta Orthop. 2016 Feb;87(1):42-7
pubmed: 26364953
Hip. 1982;:42-9
pubmed: 7166505
Acta Orthop. 2013 Dec;84(6):544-8
pubmed: 24171680
J Orthop Res. 2017 Apr;35(4):760-767
pubmed: 26825861
Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(23):4192-203
pubmed: 16618502
J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(2):168-72
pubmed: 11870650
PLoS Clin Trials. 2007 Apr 13;2(4):e18
pubmed: 17443237