Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin or gemcitabine + cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer: Results of a phase III randomised controlled trial.
Adenocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cholecystectomy
Cisplatin
/ administration & dosage
Deoxycytidine
/ administration & dosage
Female
Gallbladder Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Male
Middle Aged
Oxaliplatin
/ administration & dosage
Progression-Free Survival
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Gemcitabine
Cisplatin
Equivalence
Gallbladder cancer
Gemcitabine
Oxaliplatin
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
21
07
2019
revised:
24
09
2019
accepted:
01
10
2019
pubmed:
11
11
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
11
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%. Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9-9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8-12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1-11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (-1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. CTRI/2010/091/001406.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31707181
pii: S0959-8049(19)30754-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Gemcitabine
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
162-170Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.