Computer-Aided-Design/Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Titanium Cranioplasty in a Child: Critical Appraisal.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
13
11
2019
medline:
12
3
2020
entrez:
13
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Large skull bone defects of the cranial vault can result from various reasons. Reconstruction of these defects is performed for protective and aesthetic reasons but is also required for adequate intracranial homeostasis. Computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing (CAD/CAM) patient-specific skull implants have become the most valuable alternative to the traditional methods of reconstruction and a growing number of publications is dealing with this topic in adults. Literature related to the application of these implants in pediatric cranioplasty is, however, still scarce.The authors present a case of a 9-year-old boy, where cranioplasty using a CAD/CAM additive manufactured titanium implant led to improvement of symptoms attributed to cerebrospinal fluid circulation problems and intracranial homeostasis disbalance. The authors further reflect on what the role of cranioplasty should be in the therapeutic treatment plan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31714337
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005948
pii: 00001665-202001000-00062
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
237-240Références
Winkler PA, Stummer W, Linke R, et al. Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. J Neurosurg 2000; 93:53–61.
Alibhai MK, Balasundaram I, Bridle C, Holmes SB. Is there a therapeutic role for cranioplasty? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42:559–561.
Zegers T, Ter Laak-Poort M, Koper D, et al. The therapeutic effect of patient-specific implants in cranioplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 45:82–86.
Schwarz F, Dunisch P, Walter J, et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures. J Neurosurg 2016; 124:710–715.
Lethaus B, Bloebaum M, Koper D, et al. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts: success and cost analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42:1948–1951.
Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F. Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62:653–655.
Wehmoller M, Eufinger H, Kruse D, Massberg W. CAD by processing of computed tomography data and CAM of individually designed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24 (1 Pt 2):90–97.
Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Harders A, et al. Prefabricated prostheses for the reconstruction of skull defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 24:104–110.
Lethaus B, Ter Laak MP, Laeven P, et al. A treatment algorithm for patients with large skull bone defects and first results. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011; 39:435–440.
Wolff A, Santiago GF, Belzberg M, et al. Adult cranioplasty reconstruction with customized cranial implants: preferred technique, timing, and biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29:887–894.
Williams L, Fan K, Bentley R. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:789–794.
Ma IT, Symon MR, Bristol RE, et al. Outcomes of titanium mesh cranioplasty in pediatric patients. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29:99–104.
Reinert S, Fritzemeier CU, Luhr HG, Lentrodt J. The microplate system: a new armamentarium for osteosynthesis in the child skull. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1990; 45:801–803.
Berry CW, Moore TJ, Safar JA, et al. Antibacterial activity of dental implant metals. Implant Dent 1992; 1:59–65.
Zins JE, Langevin CJ, Nasir S. Controversies in skull reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21:1755–1760.
Hockley AD, Goldin JH, Wake MJ, Iqbal J. Skull repair in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1990; 16:271–275.
Poukens J, Laeven P, Beerens M, et al. A classification of cranial implants based on the degree of difficulty in computer design and manufacture. Int J Med Robot 2008; 4:46–50.
Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, et al. Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 2004; 100: (2 Suppl Pediatrics): 163–168.
Frassanito P, Massimi L, Caldarelli M, et al. Complications of delayed cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy in children less than 1 year old. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154:927–933.
Bowers CA, Riva-Cambrin J, Hertzler DA 2nd, et al. Risk factors and rates of bone flap resorption in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2013; 11:526–532.
Santiago GF, Terner J, Wolff A, et al. Post-neurosurgical temporal deformities: various techniques for correction and associated complications. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29:1723–1729.
Ashayeri K, Jackson EM, Huang J, et al. Syndrome of the trephined: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2016; 79:525–534.
Agnati LF, Genedani S, Lenzi PL, et al. Energy gradients for the homeostatic control of brain ECF composition and for VT signal migration: introduction of the tide hypothesis. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2005; 112:45–63.
Jelcic N, Della Puppa A, Mottaran R, et al. Case series evidence for improvement of executive functions after late cranioplasty. Brain Inj 2013; 27:1723–1726.
Mokri B. Orthostatic headaches in the syndrome of the trephined: resolution following cranioplasty. Headache 2010; 50:1206–1211.
Kelley GR, Johnson PL. Sinking brain syndrome: craniotomy can precipitate brainstem herniation in CSF hypovolemia. Neurology 2004; 62:157.
Fodstad H, Ekstedt J, Friden H. CSF hydrodynamic studies before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1979; 28:514–518.
Jeyaraj P. Efficacy and versatility of the 3-D titanium mesh implant in the closure of large post-craniectomy osseous defects, and its therapeutic role in reversing the syndrome of the trephined: clinical study of a case series and review of literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016; 15:82–92.
Fodstad H, Love JA, Ekstedt J, et al. Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with the syndrome of the trephined. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1984; 70:21–30.
Coelho F, Oliveira AM, Paiva WS, et al. Comprehensive cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic evaluation after cranioplasty. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10:695–701.
Greitz D, Wirestam R, Franck A, et al. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 1992; 34:370–380.
Waziri A, Fusco D, Mayer SA, et al. Postoperative hydrocephalus in patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Neurosurgery 2007; 61:489–493.