Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Italian version of the craniofacial pain and disability inventory in patients with chronic temporomandibular joint disorders.
Craniofacial pain disability inventory
Cross-cultural adaptation
Italian validation
Psychometrics
Temporomandibular disorders
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 11 2019
12 11 2019
Historique:
received:
15
04
2018
accepted:
15
10
2019
entrez:
14
11
2019
pubmed:
14
11
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To develop an Italian version of the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory (CFPDI-I) and investigate its psychometric abilities in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The CFPDI was translated following international standards. The psychometric analyses included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC); construct validity was investigated by matching (a priori hypotheses) the CFPDI-I with the Italian Neck Disability Index (NDI-I), a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS), the Italian Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I), the Italian Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-I), and the Italian Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (MIDAS) (Pearson's correlation). Alpha was set at 0.05. Two hundred and twelve patients with chronic TMD completed the tool. The questionnaire was internally consistent (α = 0.95) and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.91). As hypothesised, validity figures showed CFPDI-I strongly correlated with the NDI-I (r = 0.66, p < 0.05) and moderately correlated with the NRS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), PCS (r = 0.37, p < 0.05), TSKI (r = 0.35, p < 0.05) and MIDAS (r = 0.47, p < 0.05). Similar estimates were shown by CFPDI-I subscales. The cross-culturally adapted version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CFPDI-I) showed satisfactory psychometric properties that replicate those of the original version and, therefore, can be implemented in the clinical assessment of Italian people affected by TMD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To develop an Italian version of the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory (CFPDI-I) and investigate its psychometric abilities in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
METHODS
The CFPDI was translated following international standards. The psychometric analyses included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test/retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC); construct validity was investigated by matching (a priori hypotheses) the CFPDI-I with the Italian Neck Disability Index (NDI-I), a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS), the Italian Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS-I), the Italian Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-I), and the Italian Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (MIDAS) (Pearson's correlation). Alpha was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
Two hundred and twelve patients with chronic TMD completed the tool. The questionnaire was internally consistent (α = 0.95) and its stability was good (ICCs = 0.91). As hypothesised, validity figures showed CFPDI-I strongly correlated with the NDI-I (r = 0.66, p < 0.05) and moderately correlated with the NRS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), PCS (r = 0.37, p < 0.05), TSKI (r = 0.35, p < 0.05) and MIDAS (r = 0.47, p < 0.05). Similar estimates were shown by CFPDI-I subscales.
CONCLUSIONS
The cross-culturally adapted version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CFPDI-I) showed satisfactory psychometric properties that replicate those of the original version and, therefore, can be implemented in the clinical assessment of Italian people affected by TMD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31718686
doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0927-x
pii: 10.1186/s12903-019-0927-x
pmc: PMC6852744
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
244Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:512792
pubmed: 25883963
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Spring;28(2):138-46
pubmed: 24829929
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jan;28(1):55-64
pubmed: 21677569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):E109-20
pubmed: 11880847
Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):95-104
pubmed: 10353497
Clin J Pain. 2016 Oct;32(10):882-8
pubmed: 26905569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 20;35(12):1241-6
pubmed: 20216338
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014 Feb 04;4(3-4):239-43
pubmed: 24611088
Headache. 2015 Feb;55 Suppl 1:72-83
pubmed: 25644695
J Headache Pain. 2015 Mar 05;16:20
pubmed: 25902781
Qual Life Res. 2012 Aug;21(6):1045-50
pubmed: 21912846
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104
pubmed: 15804318
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018 Fall;32(4):389-399
pubmed: 30365575
Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:3945673
pubmed: 27818609
Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):23-30
pubmed: 14690671
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108
pubmed: 24452650
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 1;37(17):E1038-44
pubmed: 22487712
Cephalalgia. 2007 Jun;27(6):542-9
pubmed: 17441972
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Sep;37(9):670-9
pubmed: 20524969
Eura Medicophys. 2004 Dec;40(4):263-8
pubmed: 16175148
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Pain. 2010 Sep;150(3):492-500
pubmed: 20598804
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Oct 3;31(4):339–345
pubmed: 28973049
Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31
pubmed: 4139420
Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;91(8):1184-97
pubmed: 21659465
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):103
pubmed: 27812883
Cephalalgia. 2001 Dec;21(10):947-52
pubmed: 11843865
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27
pubmed: 24482784