Communicating with patients about breakdowns in care: a national randomised vignette-based survey.


Journal

BMJ quality & safety
ISSN: 2044-5423
Titre abrégé: BMJ Qual Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101546984

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 25 04 2019
revised: 02 08 2019
accepted: 29 10 2019
pubmed: 15 11 2019
medline: 16 1 2021
entrez: 15 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many patients are reluctant to speak up about breakdowns in care, resulting in missed opportunities to respond to individual patients and improve the system. Effective approaches to encouraging patients to speak up and responding when they do are needed. To identify factors which influence speaking up, and to examine the impact of apology when problems occur. Randomised experiment using a vignette-based questionnaire describing 3 care breakdowns (slow response to call bell, rude aide, unanswered questions). The role of the person inquiring about concerns (doctor, nurse, patient care specialist), extent of the prompt (invitation to patient to share concerns) and level of apology were varied. National online survey. 1188 adults aged ≥35 years were sampled from an online panel representative of the entire US population, created and maintained by GfK, an international survey research organisation; 65.5% response rate. Affective responses to care breakdowns, intent to speak up, willingness to recommend the hospital. Twice as many participants receiving an in-depth prompt about care breakdowns would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no prompt (18.4% vs 8.8% respectively (p=0.0067)). Almost three times as many participants receiving a full apology would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no apology (34.1% vs 13.6% respectively ((p<0.0001)). Feeling upset was a strong determinant of greater intent to speak up, but a substantial number of upset participants would not 'definitely' speak up. A more extensive prompt did not result in greater likelihood of speaking up. The inquirer's role influenced speaking up for two of the three breakdowns (rudeness and slow response). Asking about possible care breakdowns in detail, and offering a full apology when breakdowns are reported substantially increases patients' willingness to recommend the hospital.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Many patients are reluctant to speak up about breakdowns in care, resulting in missed opportunities to respond to individual patients and improve the system. Effective approaches to encouraging patients to speak up and responding when they do are needed.
OBJECTIVE
To identify factors which influence speaking up, and to examine the impact of apology when problems occur.
DESIGN
Randomised experiment using a vignette-based questionnaire describing 3 care breakdowns (slow response to call bell, rude aide, unanswered questions). The role of the person inquiring about concerns (doctor, nurse, patient care specialist), extent of the prompt (invitation to patient to share concerns) and level of apology were varied.
SETTING
National online survey.
PARTICIPANTS
1188 adults aged ≥35 years were sampled from an online panel representative of the entire US population, created and maintained by GfK, an international survey research organisation; 65.5% response rate.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Affective responses to care breakdowns, intent to speak up, willingness to recommend the hospital.
RESULTS
Twice as many participants receiving an in-depth prompt about care breakdowns would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no prompt (18.4% vs 8.8% respectively (p=0.0067)). Almost three times as many participants receiving a full apology would (probably/definitely) recommend the hospital compared with those receiving no apology (34.1% vs 13.6% respectively ((p<0.0001)). Feeling upset was a strong determinant of greater intent to speak up, but a substantial number of upset participants would not 'definitely' speak up. A more extensive prompt did not result in greater likelihood of speaking up. The inquirer's role influenced speaking up for two of the three breakdowns (rudeness and slow response).
CONCLUSIONS
Asking about possible care breakdowns in detail, and offering a full apology when breakdowns are reported substantially increases patients' willingness to recommend the hospital.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31723017
pii: bmjqs-2019-009712
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009712
pmc: PMC7170008
mid: NIHMS1577808
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Pagination

313-319

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K08 HS024596
Pays : United States
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R18 HS022757
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar;90(3):341-6
pubmed: 21824739
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1821-1827
pubmed: 30395513
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Sep - Oct;46(5):716-726
pubmed: 28774759
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Apr;19(2):148-57
pubmed: 20351164
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec;27(6):424-42
pubmed: 26424702
JAMA. 2006 Sep 20;296(11):1401-4
pubmed: 16985235
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1030-8
pubmed: 22566443
J Hosp Med. 2017 Aug;12(8):603-609
pubmed: 28786425
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb;27(2):96-98
pubmed: 29217696
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Mar;21(3):198-205
pubmed: 22178930
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1685-93
pubmed: 27067065
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1784-90
pubmed: 22508828
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):190-197
pubmed: 30269059
Health (London). 2018 Nov;22(6):603-623
pubmed: 28830300
J Patient Saf. 2018 Jun 27;:
pubmed: 29957680
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):928-936
pubmed: 30002146
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 16;140(6):409-18
pubmed: 15023706
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 15;149(2):100-8
pubmed: 18626049
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e33
pubmed: 21127092
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):618-9
pubmed: 26857030
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Apr;45(4):276-284
pubmed: 30170754

Auteurs

Kimberly A Fisher (KA)

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA kimberly.fisher@umassmemorial.org.
Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Thomas H Gallagher (TH)

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Kelly M Smith (KM)

MedStar Institute for Quality and Safety, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

Yanhua Zhou (Y)

Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Sybil Crawford (S)

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Azraa Amroze (A)

Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Kathleen M Mazor (KM)

Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Meyers Primary Care Institute, a joint endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH