Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.
Adult
Brain Mapping
/ methods
Choice Behavior
/ physiology
Cues
Eye-Tracking Technology
Facial Recognition
/ physiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Individuality
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Nerve Net
/ diagnostic imaging
Practice, Psychological
Prefrontal Cortex
/ diagnostic imaging
Support Vector Machine
Ventral Striatum
/ diagnostic imaging
Young Adult
choice behavior
decision making
learning
ventral striatum
ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Journal
Human brain mapping
ISSN: 1097-0193
Titre abrégé: Hum Brain Mapp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9419065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2019
revised:
19
09
2019
accepted:
07
10
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
24
7
2021
entrez:
16
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Developing effective preference modification paradigms is crucial to improve the quality of life in a wide range of behaviors. The cue-approach training (CAT) paradigm has been introduced as an effective tool to modify preferences lasting months, without external reinforcements, using the mere association of images with a cue and a speeded button response. In the current work for the first time, we used fMRI with faces as stimuli in the CAT paradigm, focusing on face-selective brain regions. We found a behavioral change effect of CAT with faces immediately and 1-month after training, however face-selective regions were not indicative of behavioral change and thus preference change is less likely to rely on face processing brain regions. Nevertheless, we found that during training, fMRI activations in the ventral striatum were correlated with individual preference change. We also found a correlation between preference change and activations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex during the binary choice phase. Functional connectivity among striatum, prefrontal regions, and high-level visual regions was also related to individual preference change. Our work sheds new light on the involvement of neural mechanisms in the process of valuation. This could lead to development of novel real-world interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31729115
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24859
pmc: PMC7268020
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1043-1060Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Science. 1990 Dec 7;250(4986):1429-32
pubmed: 2147780
Nature. 2006 Aug 31;442(7106):1042-5
pubmed: 16929307
Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):270-3
pubmed: 23066083
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;92(3):1830-9
pubmed: 15115795
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Dec;9(12):2017-25
pubmed: 24493836
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):179-94
pubmed: 9931268
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):294-8
pubmed: 26158966
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7900-5
pubmed: 27357684
Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):430-41
pubmed: 12814592
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:124-132
pubmed: 28627402
Sci Rep. 2018 May 4;8(1):7036
pubmed: 29728577
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 11;6:149
pubmed: 23087605
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Jun;23(2):204-215
pubmed: 28150960
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):769-76
pubmed: 15582382
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jul;121(3):337-66
pubmed: 25090423
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76
pubmed: 23571845
Neuron. 2003 May 22;38(4):525-8
pubmed: 12765605
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1289-302
pubmed: 23887811
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):452-4
pubmed: 15087550
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:208-215
pubmed: 30550808
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 26;8(1):3614
pubmed: 29483525
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:92-104
pubmed: 27677231
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 May;30(5):1637-51
pubmed: 18661501
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1144-56
pubmed: 15612860
Curr Biol. 2006 Jan 10;16(1):63-8
pubmed: 16401423
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 23;7:421
pubmed: 27047435
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):38-45
pubmed: 16318922
Nat Methods. 2019 Jan;16(1):111-116
pubmed: 30532080
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1277-86
pubmed: 22484411
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8
pubmed: 20835253
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):173-8
pubmed: 18692572
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Dec;27(12):1135-42
pubmed: 21049527
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):625-30
pubmed: 24609465
J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 11;26(2):435-9
pubmed: 16407540
J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
pubmed: 9151747
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
pubmed: 18545266
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7
pubmed: 21808009
Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044
pubmed: 27326542
Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 1;72(7):572-9
pubmed: 22579509
Neuron. 2001 Nov 8;32(3):537-51
pubmed: 11709163
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):546-54
pubmed: 21983149
Neuron. 2009 Sep 24;63(6):733-45
pubmed: 19778504
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
pubmed: 15501092
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12315-20
pubmed: 19793990
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):858-874
pubmed: 31408106
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:412-27
pubmed: 23507394
Brain Res. 2015 Nov 11;1626:136-45
pubmed: 25557401
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):941-51
pubmed: 18211242
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 21;27(47):12860-7
pubmed: 18032658
Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):889-98
pubmed: 15572118
J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8729-41
pubmed: 23678116
Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
pubmed: 17659998
Neuron. 2004 Jan 22;41(2):281-92
pubmed: 14741108
Neuron. 2009 Nov 12;64(3):431-9
pubmed: 19914190
Neuroimage. 2003 May;19(1):200-7
pubmed: 12781739
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(1):153-82
pubmed: 20571485
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):CD004307
pubmed: 21491388
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1043-1060
pubmed: 31729115
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1400
pubmed: 26441775