The CogBIAS longitudinal study of adolescence: cohort profile and stability and change in measures across three waves.
Adolescent
Behavioural
Change
Cognitive
Development
Impulsivity
Longitudinal
Mood
Stability
Journal
BMC psychology
ISSN: 2050-7283
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101627676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2019
15 Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
28
04
2019
accepted:
09
10
2019
entrez:
16
11
2019
pubmed:
16
11
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adolescence is a time of considerable social, cognitive, and physiological development. It reflects a period of heightened risk for the onset of mental health problems, as well as heightened opportunity for flourishing and resilience. The CogBIAS Longitudinal Study (CogBIAS-L-S) aims to investigate psychological development during adolescence. We present the cohort profile of the sample (N = 504) across three waves of data collection, when participants were approximately 13, 14.5, and 16 years of age. Further, we present descriptive statistics for all of the psychological variables assessed including (a) the self-report mood measures, (b) the other self-report measures, and (c) the behavioural measures. Differential and normative stability were investigated for each variable, in order to assess (i) measurement reliability (internal consistency), (ii) the stability of individual differences (intra-class correlations), and (iii) whether any adolescent-typical developmental changes occurred (multilevel growth curve models). Measurement reliability was good for the self-report measures (> .70), but lower for the behavioural measures (between .00 and .78). Differential stability was substantial, as individual differences were largely maintained across waves. Although, stability was lower for the behavioural measures. Some adolescent-typical normative changes were observed, reflected by (i) worsening mood, (ii) increasing impulsivity, and (iii) improvements in executive functions. The stability of individual differences was substantial across most variables, supporting classical test theory. Some normative changes were observed that reflected adolescent-typical development. Although, normative changes were relatively small compared to the stability of individual differences. The development of stable psychological characteristics during this period highlights a potential intervention window in early adolescence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Adolescence is a time of considerable social, cognitive, and physiological development. It reflects a period of heightened risk for the onset of mental health problems, as well as heightened opportunity for flourishing and resilience. The CogBIAS Longitudinal Study (CogBIAS-L-S) aims to investigate psychological development during adolescence.
METHODS
METHODS
We present the cohort profile of the sample (N = 504) across three waves of data collection, when participants were approximately 13, 14.5, and 16 years of age. Further, we present descriptive statistics for all of the psychological variables assessed including (a) the self-report mood measures, (b) the other self-report measures, and (c) the behavioural measures. Differential and normative stability were investigated for each variable, in order to assess (i) measurement reliability (internal consistency), (ii) the stability of individual differences (intra-class correlations), and (iii) whether any adolescent-typical developmental changes occurred (multilevel growth curve models).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Measurement reliability was good for the self-report measures (> .70), but lower for the behavioural measures (between .00 and .78). Differential stability was substantial, as individual differences were largely maintained across waves. Although, stability was lower for the behavioural measures. Some adolescent-typical normative changes were observed, reflected by (i) worsening mood, (ii) increasing impulsivity, and (iii) improvements in executive functions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The stability of individual differences was substantial across most variables, supporting classical test theory. Some normative changes were observed that reflected adolescent-typical development. Although, normative changes were relatively small compared to the stability of individual differences. The development of stable psychological characteristics during this period highlights a potential intervention window in early adolescence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31730492
doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0342-8
pii: 10.1186/s40359-019-0342-8
pmc: PMC6858768
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 324176
Pays : International
Références
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):636-50
pubmed: 22903221
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;207(4):320-7
pubmed: 26206865
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Aug;128(6):563-573
pubmed: 31368735
Pain. 2003 Aug;104(3):639-46
pubmed: 12927636
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018 May;77:133-143
pubmed: 29051054
Eat Behav. 2011 Apr;12(2):126-30
pubmed: 21385642
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):213-240
pubmed: 22730921
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1166-1186
pubmed: 28726177
J Pain. 2018 Jun;19(6):589-598
pubmed: 29374535
J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Feb;95(1):15-20
pubmed: 3700842
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Oct;19(10):558-566
pubmed: 26419496
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jun;35(6):569-81
pubmed: 9159982
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Jun;37(3):598-608
pubmed: 6747551
Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8
pubmed: 11296689
Assessment. 2010 Mar;17(1):116-25
pubmed: 19955108
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;21(12):1657-1662
pubmed: 27431291
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Sep;30(9):809-21
pubmed: 23596129
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1046-62
pubmed: 23199236
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):387-407
pubmed: 27966780
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):128-40
pubmed: 9505045
Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun;8(2):71-82
pubmed: 12638061
Cogn Emot. 2017 Apr;31(3):462-483
pubmed: 26785312
Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):51-8
pubmed: 10863045
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;17:103-17
pubmed: 26774291
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:636-643
pubmed: 29066344
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Mar;43(3):309-22
pubmed: 15680928
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):75-84
pubmed: 12075692
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):583-92
pubmed: 25810453
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Dec;24(12):1715-25
pubmed: 11126230
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:111-26
pubmed: 18400927
Dev Psychol. 2018 Jan;54(1):51-70
pubmed: 28933890
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412
pubmed: 24844115
Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;20(1):385-406
pubmed: 11827095
J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:8-23
pubmed: 24308895
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:617
pubmed: 25009514
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9
pubmed: 20855043
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;147:517-23
pubmed: 4075046
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002 Sep;31(3):325-34
pubmed: 12149970
Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):833-45
pubmed: 22329531
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;17:118-27
pubmed: 26777136
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1462-71
pubmed: 18420374
Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82
pubmed: 12964174
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Oct;26(10):4101-21
pubmed: 26408800
J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Jun;43(2):207-22
pubmed: 12096700
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:449-61
pubmed: 23579318
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):225-36
pubmed: 12003445
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95
pubmed: 17716086
J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Apr;55(2):277-94
pubmed: 8501428
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1051-2
pubmed: 27095143