Efficacy of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab According to Number of IMDC Risk Factors in CheckMate 214.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ drug therapy
Databases, Factual
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Ipilimumab
/ administration & dosage
Kidney Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Nivolumab
/ administration & dosage
Risk Factors
Sunitinib
/ administration & dosage
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
CheckMate 214
Ipilimumab
Nivolumab
Phase 3
Journal
European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
accepted:
21
10
2019
pubmed:
17
11
2019
medline:
28
5
2021
entrez:
17
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 wk for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 wk) had superior efficacy over sunitinib (50 mg once daily, 4 wk on, 2 wk off) in patients with untreated International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma; the benefits were sustained through extended follow-up. To better characterize the association between outcomes and IMDC risk in CheckMate 214, we completed a post hoc analysis (n = 1051) of efficacy by the number of IMDC risk factors. The investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 were evaluated. ORR with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was consistent across zero to six IMDC risk factors, whereas with sunitinib it decreased with increasing number of risk factors. Benefits of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib in terms of ORR (40-44% vs 16-38%), OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50-0.72), and PFS (HR 0.44-0.86) were consistently observed in subgroups with one, two, three, or four to six IMDC risk factors (p < 0.05 for treatment × no. of risk factors interaction). These results demonstrate the benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib across all intermediate-risk and poor-risk groups, regardless of the number of IMDC risk factors. PATIENT SUMMARY: This report from the CheckMate 214 study describes a consistent efficacy benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab over first-line sunitinib in all groups of patients with intermediate-risk or poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma, regardless of the number of risk factors they had before starting treatment. We conclude that there is a benefit of first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for all intermediate-risk patients, including those with one or two risk factors, and for all poor-risk patients, independent of the number of risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31732098
pii: S0302-2838(19)30824-3
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.025
pmc: PMC7521478
mid: NIHMS1624376
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Ipilimumab
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449-453Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5794-9
pubmed: 19826129
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Oct;16(5):355-359.e1
pubmed: 29803346
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115
pubmed: 30779531
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385
pubmed: 31427204