Effects of Venous Angioplasty on Cerebral Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Expanded Analysis of the Brave Dreams Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon
Brain
/ blood supply
Cerebrovascular Disorders
/ diagnostic imaging
Chronic Disease
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Italy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive
/ complications
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
/ complications
Spine
/ blood supply
Treatment Outcome
Venous Insufficiency
/ diagnosis
Young Adult
angioplasty
cerebral drainage
cerebral lesion
chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency
echo Doppler
internal jugular vein
jugular flow
magnetic resonance imaging
multiple sclerosis
stenosis
vein defects
venography
venoplasty
Journal
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
19
11
2019
medline:
25
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate if jugular vein flow restoration in various venographic defects indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients can have positive effects on cerebral lesions identified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The Brave Dreams trial ( Of the 130 patients enrolled, 125 (96%) completed the 12-month MRI follow-up. Analysis showed that the likelihood of being free of new cerebral lesions at 1 year was significantly higher after venoplasty compared to the sham group (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.01, p=0.032). Patients with favorable venograms had a significantly higher probability of being free of new cerebral lesions than patients with unfavorable venograms (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.83, p=0.005) or patients in the sham arm (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.37, p=0.005). Expanded analysis of the Brave Dreams data that included secondary/progressive MS patients in addition to the relapsing/remitting patients analyzed previously showed that venoplasty decreases new cerebral lesions at 1 year. Secondary analysis confirmed the efficacy of the Giaquinta grading system in selecting patients appropriate for venoplasty who were more likely to be free from accumulation of new cerebral lesions at MRI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31735108
doi: 10.1177/1526602819890110
pmc: PMC6970429
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01371760']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1526602819890110Investigateurs
Elena Barbarossa
(E)
Ilaria Bartolomei
(I)
Stefano Ceruti
(S)
Paolo Conforti
(P)
Anna Maria Malagoni
(AM)
Erica Menegatti
(E)
Mirko Tessari
(M)
Lisa Pellegrino
(L)
Francesca Pancaldi
(F)
Maria Elena Vanini
(ME)
Maria Grazia Piscaglia
(MG)
Patrizia Cenni
(P)
Fabrizio Rasi
(F)
Mara Babini
(M)
Antonella Drea
(A)
Eugenia Guerrini
(E)
Enrico Maria Lotti
(E)
Agnese Morelli
(A)
Milena Peroni
(M)
Valentina Zalambani
(V)
Sauro Zecchini
(S)
Clara Chisari
(C)
Alessia Giaquinta
(A)
Ignazio Chiaramonte
(I)
Vincenzo Cimino
(V)
Luigi Di Pino
(L)
Gianni Failla
(G)
Pierfrancesco Veroux
(P)
Roberto Cantello
(R)
Maurizio Leone
(M)
Lorenzo Coppo
(L)
Giuseppe Guzzardi
(G)
Olga Raymkulova
(O)
Simona Ruggerone
(S)
Alessandro Stecco
(A)
Domizia Vecchio
(D)
Paolo Agostino Confalonieri
(P)
Elisa Ciceri
(E)
Maura Danni
(M)
Salvatore Alborino
(S)
Carla Belleggia
(C)
Giuseppe Luccioni
(G)
Luigi Oncini
(L)
Cristina Quatrini
(C)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Nov;118(11):2443-2454
pubmed: 30171350
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Mar;27(2):129-31
pubmed: 25468583
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Feb;119(2):308-318
pubmed: 30605919
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;56(5):618-621
pubmed: 30049571
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;80(4):392-9
pubmed: 19060024
J Clin Invest. 2013 Mar;123(3):1299-309
pubmed: 23434588
Neurology. 2014 Jul 29;83(5):441-9
pubmed: 24975855
J Neuroimaging. 2012 Apr;22(2):129-36
pubmed: 21447022
Trials. 2012 Oct 03;13:183
pubmed: 23034121
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2017;14(4):316-322
pubmed: 28982329
Ann Neurol. 2011 Jul;70(1):22-9
pubmed: 21710622
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Nov;47(8):620-4
pubmed: 24005191
Neurology. 2018 Oct 30;91(18):e1660-e1668
pubmed: 30266886
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:275-286
pubmed: 31445091
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):35-43
pubmed: 29150995
Neurol Res. 2012 Oct;34(8):780-92
pubmed: 22971468
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Nov;5(6):777-788
pubmed: 29037345
Brain. 2004 Jan;127(Pt 1):111-9
pubmed: 14570816
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 07;4:6540
pubmed: 25286775
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Dec;24(12):1790-7
pubmed: 24409471
Int Angiol. 2015 Apr;34(2):97-149
pubmed: 24566499
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):434-45
pubmed: 27638998
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2015;12(4):384-97
pubmed: 26256005
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1348-58.e1-3
pubmed: 19958985
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2014 May;11(2):149-55
pubmed: 24712644
Neurol Sci. 2001 Nov;22 Suppl 2:S123-7
pubmed: 11794475
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Nov;5(6):775-776
pubmed: 29037344
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Jul;161(7):1367-1370
pubmed: 31025176
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Jul 09;11:1756286418785499
pubmed: 30034537
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1785-94.e17
pubmed: 25255703
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 31;5:CD009903
pubmed: 31150100
CMAJ. 2011 Nov 8;183(16):E1203-12
pubmed: 21969411
Neurology. 2011 Jul 12;77(2):138-44
pubmed: 21490322