Hook-wire localization versus lipiodol localization for patients with pulmonary lesions having ground-glass opacity.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Contrast Media
Ethiodized Oil
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
/ diagnostic imaging
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
/ adverse effects
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
ground-glass opacity
hook-wire
lipiodol
localization
video-assisted thoracic surgery
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
01
02
2019
revised:
11
08
2019
accepted:
20
08
2019
pubmed:
19
11
2019
medline:
4
4
2020
entrez:
19
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate and safe preoperative localization is useful for video-assisted thoracic surgery of small pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity (GGO). However, the optimal localization method is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness and safety of the lipiodol and hook-wire localization techniques for video-assisted thoracic surgery of GGO lesions. This prospective, non-randomized comparative study was conducted between April 2014 and December 2016 at 8 qualifying university teaching hospitals. Two-hundred-fifty patients with pulmonary lesions having GGO were included. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the lipiodol (n = 125, 4 hospitals) or hook-wire group (n = 125, 4 hospitals) for preoperative localization procedures. Participants underwent preoperative localization via the lipiodol or hook-wire technique followed by thoracoscopic surgery. The primary endpoint was the procedure success rate. The procedure success rates (hook-wire vs lipiodol group) were 94.40% versus 99.16% (P = .08). Localization-related complications occurred in 53.60% versus 48.33% of patients (P = .49). Hemorrhage rates were significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (21.6% vs 5.83%, P < .001). The lipiodol procedure time was significantly longer than that of the hook-wire technique (20.69 ± 9.34 vs 17.15 ± 7.91 minutes, P = .001). The initially positive surgical resection margin was significantly greater in the hook-wire group than in the lipiodol group (10.89% vs 2.38%, P = .02). There was no significant difference in success rate between the hook-wire and lipiodol methods. However, the hemorrhage rate was significantly greater in the hook-wire group, whereas the hook-wire group showed greater initially positive surgical resection margins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31735392
pii: S0022-5223(19)31899-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.100
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Contrast Media
0
Ethiodized Oil
8008-53-5
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1571-1579.e2Investigateurs
Chul Hwan Park
(CH)
Sang Min Lee
(SM)
Ji Won Lee
(JW)
Sung Ho Hwang
(SH)
Jae Seung Seo
(JS)
Kye Ho Lee
(KH)
Woocheol Kwon
(W)
Dong Jin Im
(DJ)
Kyunghwa Han
(K)
Tae Hoon Kim
(TH)
Byoung Wook Choi
(BW)
Jin Hur
(J)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.