Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis.
Ileo-colic anastomosis
Intracorporeal anastomosis
Laparoscopy
Outcomes
Postoperative complications
Right hemicolectomy
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
accepted:
11
11
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
20
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While laparoscopic approach for right hemicolectomy (LRH) is considered appropriate for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign diseases of right colon, there is still debate about how to perform the ileo-colic anastomosis. The ColonDxItalianGroup (CoDIG) was designed as a cohort, observational, prospective, multi-center national study with the aims of evaluating the surgeons' attitude regarding the intracorporeal (ICA) or extra-corporeal (ECA) anastomotic technique and the related surgical outcomes. One hundred and twenty-five Surgical Units experienced in colorectal and advanced laparoscopic surgery were invited and 85 of them joined the study. Each center was asked not to change its surgical habits. Data about demographic characteristics, surgical technique and postoperative outcomes were collected through the official SICE website database. One thousand two hundred and twenty-five patients were enrolled between March 2018 and September 2018. ICA was performed in 70.4% of cases, ECA in 29.6%. Isoperistaltic anastomosis was completed in 85.6%, stapled in 87.9%. Hand-sewn enterotomy closure was adopted in 86%. Postoperative complications were reported in 35.4% for ICA and 50.7% for ECA; no significant difference was found according to patients' characteristics and technologies used. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter for ICA (7.3 vs. 9 POD). Postoperative pain in patients not prescribed opioids was significantly lower in ICA group. In our survey, a side-to-side isoperistaltic stapled ICA with hand-sewn enterotomy closure is the most frequently adopted technique to perform ileo-colic anastomosis after any indications for elective LRH. According to literature, our study confirmed better short-term outcomes for ICA, with reduction of hospital stay and postoperative pain. Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT03934151).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While laparoscopic approach for right hemicolectomy (LRH) is considered appropriate for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign diseases of right colon, there is still debate about how to perform the ileo-colic anastomosis. The ColonDxItalianGroup (CoDIG) was designed as a cohort, observational, prospective, multi-center national study with the aims of evaluating the surgeons' attitude regarding the intracorporeal (ICA) or extra-corporeal (ECA) anastomotic technique and the related surgical outcomes.
METHODS
One hundred and twenty-five Surgical Units experienced in colorectal and advanced laparoscopic surgery were invited and 85 of them joined the study. Each center was asked not to change its surgical habits. Data about demographic characteristics, surgical technique and postoperative outcomes were collected through the official SICE website database. One thousand two hundred and twenty-five patients were enrolled between March 2018 and September 2018.
RESULTS
ICA was performed in 70.4% of cases, ECA in 29.6%. Isoperistaltic anastomosis was completed in 85.6%, stapled in 87.9%. Hand-sewn enterotomy closure was adopted in 86%. Postoperative complications were reported in 35.4% for ICA and 50.7% for ECA; no significant difference was found according to patients' characteristics and technologies used. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter for ICA (7.3 vs. 9 POD). Postoperative pain in patients not prescribed opioids was significantly lower in ICA group.
CONCLUSIONS
In our survey, a side-to-side isoperistaltic stapled ICA with hand-sewn enterotomy closure is the most frequently adopted technique to perform ileo-colic anastomosis after any indications for elective LRH. According to literature, our study confirmed better short-term outcomes for ICA, with reduction of hospital stay and postoperative pain.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT03934151).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31741153
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07255-2
pii: 10.1007/s00464-019-07255-2
pmc: PMC7572335
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03934151']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4788-4800Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Mar;33(3):291-298
pubmed: 29327167
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Jan;18(1):5-12
pubmed: 23686680
J Cancer. 2012;3:49-57
pubmed: 22315650
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77
pubmed: 27287905
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32
pubmed: 18538699
Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):63-8
pubmed: 25621913
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):621-7
pubmed: 14603179
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;28(9):1177-86
pubmed: 23371336
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):417-427
pubmed: 27595589
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206277
pubmed: 30356298
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2902-8
pubmed: 20703468
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;30(11):1457-72
pubmed: 26137968
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2314-20
pubmed: 25414066
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2613-8
pubmed: 23397503
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80
pubmed: 17651561
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695
pubmed: 30426190
Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):77-81
pubmed: 30470995
Surg Endosc. 2002 Apr;16(4):596-602
pubmed: 11972196
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Oct;17(5):479-85
pubmed: 23519986
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1730-6
pubmed: 23242489
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(48):e5538
pubmed: 27902621
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1986-90
pubmed: 23299132
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;31(1):105-14
pubmed: 26315015
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1020-1032
pubmed: 30456506
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3823-9
pubmed: 26659237
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5275-5282
pubmed: 28577059
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar 6;:
pubmed: 28263043
Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;22(1):1-13
pubmed: 23116767
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;33(11):1635-1641
pubmed: 30191370
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Feb;403(1):1-10
pubmed: 29234886
Am J Surg. 2018 May;215(5):905-908
pubmed: 29587966
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):65-72
pubmed: 25801109
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 7;18(29):3869-74
pubmed: 22876039
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):891-895
pubmed: 28836249
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3933-42
pubmed: 26715015
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan;116(3):389-397
pubmed: 28056465