Electrophysiological assessment of plant status outside a Faraday cage using supervised machine learning.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2019
19 11 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
entrez:
21
11
2019
pubmed:
21
11
2019
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Living organisms have evolved complex signaling networks to drive appropriate physiological processes in response to changing environmental conditions. Amongst them, electric signals are a universal method to rapidly transmit information. In animals, bioelectrical activity measurements in the heart or the brain provide information about health status. In plants, practical measurements of bioelectrical activity are in their infancy and transposition of technology used in human medicine could therefore, by analogy provide insight about the physiological status of plants. This paper reports on the development and testing of an innovative electrophysiological sensor that can be used in greenhouse production conditions, without a Faraday cage, enabling real-time electric signal measurements. The bioelectrical activity is modified in response to water stress conditions or to nycthemeral rhythm. Furthermore, the automatic classification of plant status using supervised machine learning allows detection of these physiological modifications. This sensor represents an efficient alternative agronomic tool at the service of producers for decision support or for taking preventive measures before initial visual symptoms of plant stress appear.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31745185
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53675-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-53675-4
pmc: PMC6864072
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17073Références
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Mar;36(3):542-52
pubmed: 22897236
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jul 04;4:239
pubmed: 23847642
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Mar 6;12(104):20141225
pubmed: 25631569
Plant Signal Behav. 2017 Mar 4;12(3):e1290040
pubmed: 28277967
J Exp Bot. 2014 Apr;65(7):1761-87
pubmed: 24482370
Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Feb;49(2):264-72
pubmed: 18182401
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jan;30(1):79-84
pubmed: 17177878
Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2200-9
pubmed: 16040648
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 29;9(1):5060
pubmed: 30498218
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007 May;11(3):288-95
pubmed: 17521078
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):422-6
pubmed: 23969459
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Mar;30(3):249-257
pubmed: 17263772
Int J Neurosci. 1992 Nov-Dec;67(1-4):31-80
pubmed: 1305639
Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Jan;5(1):34-41
pubmed: 20592805
Plant Physiol. 1997 Jan;113(1):209-217
pubmed: 12223601
J Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct;160(10):1203-10
pubmed: 14610889
Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(2):e976487
pubmed: 25826257
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 May 1;1465(1-2):199-218
pubmed: 10748255
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 May;21(5):376-387
pubmed: 26880317
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016 Apr 29;67:287-307
pubmed: 27023742
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2005 Jan;36(1):21-4
pubmed: 15683194
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;116(8):1826-34
pubmed: 15979403
Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:59-82
pubmed: 18842100
Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 May;14(5):187-92
pubmed: 2475930
Physiol Plant. 2015 Feb;153(2):307-17
pubmed: 25211351