Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
21
11
2019
pubmed:
21
11
2019
medline:
25
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Using social media to recruit participants is a common and cost-effective practice. Willingness to participate (WTP) in biomedical research is a function of trust in the scientific team, which is closely tied to the source of funding and institutional connections. To determine whether WTP and willingness to share social media data are associated with the type of research team and online recruitment platform. This mixed-methods longitudinal survey and qualitative study was conducted over 2 points (T1 and T2) using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. Participants were US adults aged 18 years or older who use at least 1 social media platform. Recruitment was stratified to match race/ethnicity proportions of the 2010 US Census. The volunteer sample consisted of 914 participants at T1, and 655 participants completed the follow-up survey 5 months later (T2). Outcomes were (1) past experience with online research and sharing social media data for research; (2) WTP in research advertised online; (3) WTP in a study sponsored by a pharmaceutical company, a university, or a federal agency; and (4) willingness to share social media data. Opinions were solicited regarding the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation statute, which came into effect between T1 and T2. Of 914 participants completing the first survey (T1), 604 (66.1%) were aged 18 to 39 years and 494 (54.0%) were female. Of these, 655 participants (71.7%) responded at T2. While 680 participants (74.4%) indicated WTP in biomedical research, only 454 (49.3%) were willing to share their social media data. Participants were significantly less likely to participate in federally sponsored (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.64; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.66; P < .001) research than university-led studies. They were also less likely to share their social medial data for federal (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.72; P < .001) or pharmaceutical company (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.44-0.56; P < .001) research compared with academic studies. Willingness to participate in pharmaceutical company-led research decreased 11.89% from T1 to T2 (OR for T2, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77; P < .001). Reasons for WTP were interest in furthering science, financial incentives, trust in the organization, and data security. While 63.0% of respondents reported seeing new privacy policy emails related to the General Data Protection Regulation law, only 27.1% indicated this positively influenced their WTP. Thematic analysis of responses indicated that WTP may improve with stronger data security measures. This study suggests that researchers may see reduced online research participation and data sharing, particularly for research conducted outside academia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31747031
pii: 2755666
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15717
pmc: PMC6902809
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1915717Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : P50 MH115837
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH102304
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R33 MH110509
Pays : United States
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103222
pubmed: 31176040
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 06;19(4):e104
pubmed: 28385682
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7
pubmed: 25158659
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):43-50
pubmed: 27638832
BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 14;2(6):null
pubmed: 23242479
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 09;20(8):e10130
pubmed: 30093372
BMJ Innov. 2016 Jan;2(1):14-21
pubmed: 27019745
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Jul;13(3):285-294
pubmed: 29561215
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 15;20(5):e187
pubmed: 29764795
Internet Interv. 2019 Feb 26;17:100238
pubmed: 30886827
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):123-133
pubmed: 29653503
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:8-15
pubmed: 27498376
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 20;18(12):e330
pubmed: 27998876
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 7;18(11):e286
pubmed: 27821383
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192542
pubmed: 31002321
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 7;378(23):2202-2211
pubmed: 29874542
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):44-53
pubmed: 20967495