Outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia in intensive care unit: a nationwide retrospective study.
Aged
Anti-Infective Agents
/ pharmacology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
/ diagnosis
Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
/ diagnosis
Hospital Mortality
/ trends
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ trends
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumonia, Bacterial
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
Antimicrobial therapy
Combination therapy
Hospital-acquired pneumonia
Intensive care
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 11 2019
21 11 2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2019
accepted:
15
10
2019
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
11
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. The optimal modalities of antimicrobial therapy remain to be determined. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy. This nationwide retrospective study included all patients admitted to 25 French mixed intensive care units between 2012 and 2017 with hospital-acquired S. maltophilia HAP during intensive care unit stay. Primary endpoint was time to in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic effectiveness and antimicrobial therapeutic modalities such as delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, mono versus combination therapy, and duration of antimicrobial therapy. Of the 282 patients included, 84% were intubated at S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis for duration of 11 [5-18] days. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 47 [36-63], and the in-hospital mortality was 49.7%. Underlying chronic pulmonary comorbidities were present in 14.1% of cases. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered effective on S. maltophilia according to susceptibility patterns in only 30% of cases. Delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had, however, no significant impact on the primary endpoint. Survival analysis did not show any benefit from combination antimicrobial therapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CI [0.88; 1.83], p = 0.20) or prolonged antimicrobial therapy for more than 7 days (HR = 1.06, 95%CI [0.6; 1.86], p = 0.84). No differences were noted in in-hospital death irrespective of an appropriate and timely empiric antimicrobial therapy between mono- versus polymicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.273). The duration of ventilation prior to S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis and ICU length of stay were shorter in patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.031 and p = 0.034 respectively). S. maltophilia HAP occurred in severe, long-stay intensive care patients who mainly required prolonged invasive ventilation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was barely effective while antimicrobial treatment modalities had no significant impact on hospital survival. clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03506191.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. The optimal modalities of antimicrobial therapy remain to be determined. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy.
METHODS
This nationwide retrospective study included all patients admitted to 25 French mixed intensive care units between 2012 and 2017 with hospital-acquired S. maltophilia HAP during intensive care unit stay. Primary endpoint was time to in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic effectiveness and antimicrobial therapeutic modalities such as delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, mono versus combination therapy, and duration of antimicrobial therapy.
RESULTS
Of the 282 patients included, 84% were intubated at S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis for duration of 11 [5-18] days. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 47 [36-63], and the in-hospital mortality was 49.7%. Underlying chronic pulmonary comorbidities were present in 14.1% of cases. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered effective on S. maltophilia according to susceptibility patterns in only 30% of cases. Delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had, however, no significant impact on the primary endpoint. Survival analysis did not show any benefit from combination antimicrobial therapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CI [0.88; 1.83], p = 0.20) or prolonged antimicrobial therapy for more than 7 days (HR = 1.06, 95%CI [0.6; 1.86], p = 0.84). No differences were noted in in-hospital death irrespective of an appropriate and timely empiric antimicrobial therapy between mono- versus polymicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.273). The duration of ventilation prior to S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis and ICU length of stay were shorter in patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.031 and p = 0.034 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
S. maltophilia HAP occurred in severe, long-stay intensive care patients who mainly required prolonged invasive ventilation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was barely effective while antimicrobial treatment modalities had no significant impact on hospital survival.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03506191.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31752976
doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2649-5
pii: 10.1186/s13054-019-2649-5
pmc: PMC6873544
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Infective Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03506191']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
371Investigateurs
Jean-Michel Constantin
(JM)
Thomas Godet
(T)
Philippe Guerci
(P)
Sebastien Perbet
(S)
Stanislas Ledochowski
(S)
Références
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61
pubmed: 20925139
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 15;68(5):748-756
pubmed: 29982376
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Dec;37(6):625-627
pubmed: 30580776
Eur Respir J. 2005 May;25(5):911-4
pubmed: 15863651
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):185-230
pubmed: 23554414
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Aug 22;60(9):5130-4
pubmed: 27551008
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111
pubmed: 27418577
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 27;370(13):1198-208
pubmed: 24670166
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4):
pubmed: 29339385
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):672-81
pubmed: 23358539
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Sep 22;61(10):
pubmed: 28784669
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1029-39
pubmed: 27025939
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R143
pubmed: 17026755
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1419-28
pubmed: 22057419
Heart Lung. 1999 Mar-Apr;28(2):134-41
pubmed: 10076113
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Oct;27(10):901-6
pubmed: 18483755
J Lab Physicians. 2017 Apr-Jun;9(2):132-135
pubmed: 28367030
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;32(3):413-20
pubmed: 23344827
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Aug 1;35(3):228-35
pubmed: 12115086
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15;184(10):1133-9
pubmed: 21852541
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jul;33(7):1143-8
pubmed: 24458500
Chest. 2002 Jul;122(1):262-8
pubmed: 12114368
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):69-76
pubmed: 23641973
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Apr;13(4):201-6
pubmed: 1593100
BMC Blood Disord. 2012 Aug 16;12:10
pubmed: 22898556
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Dec;37(6):607-614
pubmed: 30580775
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Apr;43(4):328-34
pubmed: 24630306
Scand J Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;46(3):215-20
pubmed: 24447250
JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2588-98
pubmed: 14625336
J Infect. 1995 Sep;31(2):89-92
pubmed: 8666858
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jul 1;74(7):2055-2059
pubmed: 30945726
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Future Microbiol. 2009 Nov;4(9):1103-9
pubmed: 19895214
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(6-7):527-31
pubmed: 16798705
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4):
pubmed: 28115350
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):228-9
pubmed: 24346542
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 30;(10):CD006482
pubmed: 25354013
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 24;22(1):233
pubmed: 30244674
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Sep 1;43 Suppl 2:S82-8
pubmed: 16894520
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):DC20-2
pubmed: 25653948
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Apr;20(4):O255-66
pubmed: 24131428
Scand J Infect Dis. 2000;32(6):651-6
pubmed: 11200376
Crit Care. 2014 Aug 13;18(5):480
pubmed: 25405992
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2066-2069
pubmed: 26564210
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 15;51(10):1115-22
pubmed: 20936973
Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 10;50(3):
pubmed: 28890434
Respir Med. 1996 Jan;90(1):35-8
pubmed: 8857324