Genetic disorder prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination practices among high consanguinity population, Saudi Arabia.
Abortion, Induced
/ psychology
Adolescent
Adult
Consanguinity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
/ physiology
Family
Female
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
/ diagnosis
Humans
Parents
/ psychology
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis
/ psychology
Religion
Reproduction
/ physiology
Saudi Arabia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 11 2019
21 11 2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
accepted:
05
11
2019
entrez:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
23
11
2019
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of consanguineous marriage and genetic disorders are high in Saudi Arabia. There were records on the practices of Saudis toward prenatal diagnosis (PND) and termination of pregnancy (TOP), however the sample sizes are small. This study has targeted the Saudi Arabian community and family history of genetic disorders to determine the practices toward PND and TOP. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among Saudis (n = 2761) to determine their practices toward reproductive-decision making. Regression analysis was conducted to identify the association of the limiting factors, relative merits and family history on the outcomes. Total of 2507 participants returned completed questionnaire. The practice towards PND (68%) were more favorable than TOP (33%). PND was found to be a good opportunity for early diagnosis and gives parent's choice. Education, history with affected baby, prior knowledge and religious belief were significant deciding factors of PND and TOP. Down syndrome (n = 161) and sickle cell anemia (n = 152) were commonly available genetic disorder among participant's family. Respondents with autistic cases in their family have higher acceptance rate for TOP. Non-consanguineous are more willing to consider TOP than consanguineous. Participants with abnormal fetus, aged of > 36 years, married and educated Saudis were more likely consider TOP. Though, religion is the most influencing factor for not accepting TOP, comparatively willingness to PND and TOP have increased recently. Awareness campaigns about PND and TOP may increase the chances of accepting prenatal genetic diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31754150
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53655-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-53655-8
pmc: PMC6872573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17248Références
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Mar;33(3):257-61
pubmed: 23348856
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Nov;32(11):1109-13
pubmed: 22945692
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4
pubmed: 20551152
BMJ. 2006 Oct 21;333(7573):831-4
pubmed: 17053236
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):945-951
pubmed: 29383950
Community Genet. 2007;10(3):169-73
pubmed: 17575461
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(2):80-8
pubmed: 19451701
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):260-8
pubmed: 27544410
J Community Genet. 2013 Apr;4(2):215-21
pubmed: 23296641
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):21-9
pubmed: 25920556
Reprod Health. 2009 Oct 08;6:17
pubmed: 19811666
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89
pubmed: 28616007
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Feb;34(2):153-8
pubmed: 24806347
Prenat Diagn. 2001 Jun;21(6):448-51
pubmed: 11438947