Hybrid 3D analytical linear energy transfer calculation algorithm based on precalculated data from Monte Carlo simulations.
analytical calculation
linear energy transfer
proton therapy
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
19
08
2019
revised:
19
11
2019
accepted:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
24
11
2019
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
24
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET We used the Geant4 MC code to generate 3D LET The passing rate of 3D Gamma analysis comparing LET Our new method significantly improved the LET
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
745-752Subventions
Organisme : Arizona Biomedical Research Commission Investigator Award
ID : ADHS16-162521
Organisme : Cancer Research
Organisme : Kemper Marley Foundation
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Liu W, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. Med Phys. 2012;39:1079-1091.
Liu W, Frank SJ, Li X, et al. Ptv-based impt optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Med Phys. 2013;40.
Jones B, Underwood T, Dale R. The potential impact of relative biological effectiveness uncertainty on charged particle treatment prescriptions. Brit J Radiol. 2011;84:S61-S69.
Grassberger C, Trofimov A, Lomax A, et al. Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:1559-1566.
Grassberger C, Paganetti H. Elevated let components in clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:6677-6691.
Paganetti H. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R419-R472.
Gridley DS, Pecaut MJ, Mao XW, et al. Biological effects of passive vs active scanning proton beams on human lung epithelial cells. Technol. Cancer Res Treat. 2015;14:81-98.
Unkelbach J, Botas P, Giantsoudi D, et al. Reoptimization of intensity modulated proton therapy plans based on linear energy transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:1097-1106.
Wilkens J, Oelfke U. A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2811-2825.
Carabe A, Moteabbed M, Depauw N, et al. Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:1159-1172.
Wedenberg M, Lind BK, Hårdemark B. A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to let changes. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:580-588.
McNamara AL, Schuemann J, Paganetti H. A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (rbe) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:8399.
An Y, Shan J, Patel SH, et al. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk. Med Phys. 2017;44:6138-6147.
Grün R, Friedrich T, Krämer M, et al. Systematics of relative biological effectiveness measurements for proton radiation along the spread out bragg peak: experimental validation of the local effect model. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62: 890-908.
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, et al. Report of the aapm tg-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2019;46:e53-e78.
Gentile MS, Yeap BY, Paganetti H, et al. Brainstem injury in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors treated with proton beam therapy and associated dosimetric factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100:719-729.
Underwood TS, Grassberger C, Bass R, et al. Asymptomatic late-phase radiographic changes among chest-wall patients are associated with a proton rbe exceeding 1.1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101:809-819.
Peeler CR, Mirkovic D, Titt U, et al. Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:395-401.
Giantsoudi D, Grassberger C, Craft D, et al. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:216-222.
Fager M, Toma-Dasu I, Kirk M, et al. Linear energy transfer painting with proton therapy: a means of reducing radiation doses with equivalent clinical effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:1057-1064.
Tseung HSWC, Ma J, Kreofsky CR, et al. Clinically applicable monte carlo-based biological dose optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancers with spot-scanning proton therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95:1535-1543.
Ödén J, Eriksson K, Toma-Dasu I. Inclusion of a variable rbe into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2017;44:810-822.
Krämer M, Scholz M. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3319-3330.
Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Fast multifield optimization of the biological effect in ion therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:3127-3140.
Hirayama S, Matsuura T, Ueda H, et al. An analytical dose-averaged let calculation algorithm considering the off-axis let enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2018;45:3404-3416.
Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, et al. Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sec A. 2003;506:250-303.
Cortés-Giraldo M, Carabe A. A critical study of different Monte Carlo scoring methods of dose average linear-energy-transfer maps calculated in voxelized geometries irradiated with clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:2645-2669.
Granville DA, Sawakuchi GO. Comparison of linear energy transfer scoring techniques in monte carlo simulations of proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:N283-N291.
Dahle TJ, Rykkelid AM, Stokkevåg CH, et al. Monte carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:779-786.
Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Analytical linear energy transfer calculations for proton therapy. Med Phys. 2003;30:806-815.
Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U. Three-dimensional LET calculations for treatment planning of proton therapy. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2004;14:41-46.
Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Cortés-Giraldo M, Dolney D, et al. Analytical calculation of proton linear energy transfer in voxelized geometries including secondary protons. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:1705-1721.
Marsolat F, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, et al. Analytical linear energy transfer model including secondary particles: calculations along the central axis of the proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:740-757.
Gottschalk B, Koehler A, Schneider R, et al. Multiple coulomb scattering of 160 MeV protons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1993;74:467-490.
Schaffner B, Pedroni E, Lomax A. Dose calculation models for proton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: an attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:27-41.
Ding X, Liu W, Shen J, et al. Use of a radial projection to reduce the statistical uncertainty of spot lateral profiles generated by monte carlo simulation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:88-96.
Younkin JE, Morales DH, Shen J, et al. Clinical Validation of a Ray-Casting Analytical Dose Engine for Spot Scanning Proton Delivery Systems. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819887182.
Wan Chan Tseung H, Ma J, Beltran C. A fast gpu-based monte carlo simulation of proton transport with detailed modeling of nonelastic interactions. Med Phys. 2015;42:2967-2978.
Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM task group no. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45:e53-e83.
Gottschalk B, Cascio EW, Daartz J, et al. On the nuclear halo of a proton pencil beam stopping in water. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:5627-5654.
Lin L, Kang M, Solberg TD, et al. Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:6859-6873.