Sepsis patient evaluation emergency department (SPEED) score & mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score in predicting 28-day mortality of emergency sepsis patients.

Mortality Mortality in emergency department sepsis score Sepsis Sepsis patient evaluation emergency department score

Journal

Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi
ISSN: 1008-1275
Titre abrégé: Chin J Traumatol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 100886162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 07 05 2019
revised: 30 09 2019
accepted: 25 10 2019
pubmed: 26 11 2019
medline: 4 8 2020
entrez: 26 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sepsis is a common acute life-threatening condition that emergency physicians routinely face. Diagnostic options within the Emergency Department (ED) are limited due to lack of infrastructure, consequently limiting the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring or imaging tests. The mortality rate due to sepsis can be assessed via multiple scoring systems, for example, mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score and sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department (SPEED) score, both of which quantify the variation of mortality rates according to clinical findings, laboratory data, or therapeutic interventions. This study aims to improve the management processes of sepsis patients by comparing SPEED score and MEDS score for predicting the 28-day mortality in cases of emergency sepsis. The study is a cross-sectional, prospective study including 61 sepsis patients in ED in Suez Canal University Hospital, Egypt, from August 2017 to June 2018. Patients were selected by two steps: (1) suspected septic patients presenting with at least one of the following abnormal clinical findings: (a) body temperature higher than 38 °C or lower than 36 °C, (b) heart rate higher than 90 beats/min, (c) hyperventilation evidenced by respiratory rate higher than 20 breaths/min or PaCO Among the 61 patients, 41 died with the mortality rate of 67.2%. The mortality rate increased with a higher SPEED and MEDS scores. Both SPEED and MEDS scores revealed significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), indicating that both the two systems are effective in predicting the 28-day mortality of sepsis patients. Thereafter, the receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, which showed that SPEED was better than the MEDS score when applied to the complete study population with an area under the curve being 0.87 (0.788-0.963) as compared with 0.75 (0.634-0.876) for MEDS. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the best fitting predictor of 28-day mortality for sepsis patients was the SPEED scoring system. For every one unit increase in SPEED score, the odds of 28-day mortality increased by 37%. SPEED score is more useful and accurate than MEDS score in predicting the 28-day mortality among sepsis patients. Therefore SPEED rather than MEDS should be more widely used in the ED for sepsis patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31761698
pii: S1008-1275(19)30339-6
doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.10.004
pmc: PMC6921192
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

316-322

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):2793-8
pubmed: 10966252
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6
pubmed: 12682500
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):670-5
pubmed: 12626967
Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 05;17(1):25-28
pubmed: 28345070
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1788-93
pubmed: 27321936
Emerg Med J. 2012 Apr;29(4):295-300
pubmed: 21511973
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Aug;63(4):483-8
pubmed: 18719759
Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):811-9
pubmed: 22476449
Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R95
pubmed: 21401927
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):581-614
pubmed: 25932591
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87
pubmed: 26903336
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):e0187495
pubmed: 29091954
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34(6):1117-20
pubmed: 27061500
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74
pubmed: 26903335
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(3):170-175
pubmed: 26524675

Auteurs

Adel Hamed Elbaih (AH)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sulaiman Al-Rajhi Colleges, Faculty of Medicine, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: elbaihzico@yahoo.com.

Zaynab Mohammed Elsayed (ZM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Rasha Mahmoud Ahmed (RM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Sara Ahmed Abd-Elwahed (SA)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH