Frustration and Emotional Regulation in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis may manifest with complex behavioral, attentional, and emotional sequelae. The authors characterized higher level brain connectivity in adolescent nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients in response to emotional frustration. Surgically corrected patients older than 9 years with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were age/sex/handedness matched to controls. Patients participated in a "go/no-go" task, structured as win/lose/recovery paradigms. BioImage Suite was used to analyze whole-brain intrinsic connectivity between tasks with cluster-corrected group-level t maps. A value of p < 0.05 was significant. Seven unilateral coronal (average age, 12.2 years), six metopic (average age, 11.5 years), and controls were included. Unilateral coronal had worse emotional regulation scores on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function survey (p = 0.065) and performed poorly on the go/no-go task (p < 0.001). Metopic had four regions of interest, with the majority having decreased activity compared with controls, and few differences between tasks. Unilateral coronal patients had 11 regions of interest; the majority decreased during the win and lose conditions, but all increased during the recovery condition. Metopic patients had decreased blood oxygenation level- dependent signal in the posterior cingulate (p = 0.017) and middle temporal gyrus (p = 0.042). Unilateral coronal had decreased signal in the posterior cingulate (p = 0.023), middle temporal gyrus (p = 0.027), and thalamus (p = 0.033), but increased signal in the cuneus (p = 0.009) and cerebellum (p = 0.009). Right unilateral coronal, but not metopic/controls, had increased right brain activity in the caudate (p = 0.030), thalamus (p = 0.011), temporal lobe (p = 0.012), and cerebellum (p = 0.029). Unilateral coronal patients may have emotional dysregulation in response to frustration, whereas metopic patients may have attenuated emotional reactions. Evidence of right unilateral coronal brain laterality suggests that the area of suture fusion may contribute to the mechanism of dysfunction. Risk, II.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis may manifest with complex behavioral, attentional, and emotional sequelae. The authors characterized higher level brain connectivity in adolescent nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients in response to emotional frustration.
METHODS
Surgically corrected patients older than 9 years with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were age/sex/handedness matched to controls. Patients participated in a "go/no-go" task, structured as win/lose/recovery paradigms. BioImage Suite was used to analyze whole-brain intrinsic connectivity between tasks with cluster-corrected group-level t maps. A value of p < 0.05 was significant.
RESULTS
Seven unilateral coronal (average age, 12.2 years), six metopic (average age, 11.5 years), and controls were included. Unilateral coronal had worse emotional regulation scores on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function survey (p = 0.065) and performed poorly on the go/no-go task (p < 0.001). Metopic had four regions of interest, with the majority having decreased activity compared with controls, and few differences between tasks. Unilateral coronal patients had 11 regions of interest; the majority decreased during the win and lose conditions, but all increased during the recovery condition. Metopic patients had decreased blood oxygenation level- dependent signal in the posterior cingulate (p = 0.017) and middle temporal gyrus (p = 0.042). Unilateral coronal had decreased signal in the posterior cingulate (p = 0.023), middle temporal gyrus (p = 0.027), and thalamus (p = 0.033), but increased signal in the cuneus (p = 0.009) and cerebellum (p = 0.009). Right unilateral coronal, but not metopic/controls, had increased right brain activity in the caudate (p = 0.030), thalamus (p = 0.011), temporal lobe (p = 0.012), and cerebellum (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS
Unilateral coronal patients may have emotional dysregulation in response to frustration, whereas metopic patients may have attenuated emotional reactions. Evidence of right unilateral coronal brain laterality suggests that the area of suture fusion may contribute to the mechanism of dysfunction.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Risk, II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31764655
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005850
pii: 00006534-201912000-00030
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1371-1383Références
Aldridge K, Kane AA, Marsh JL, Yan P, Govier D, Richtsmeier JT. Relationship of brain and skull in pre- and postoperative sagittal synostosis. J Anat. 2005;206:373–385.
Aldridge K, Marsh JL, Govier D, Richtsmeier JT. Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis. J Anat. 2002;201:31–39.
Magge SN, Westerveld M, Pruzinsky T, Persing JA. Long-term neuropsychological effects of sagittal craniosynostosis on child development. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13:99–104.
Hashim PW, Patel A, Yang JF, et al. The effects of whole-vault cranioplasty versus strip craniectomy on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:491–501.
Patel A, Yang JF, Hashim PW, et al. The impact of age at surgery on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:608e–617e.
Kapp-Simon KA, Figueroa A, Jocher CA, Schafer M. Longitudinal assessment of mental development in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis with and without cranial release and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:831–839; discussion 840–841.
Speltz ML, Kapp-Simon KA, Cunningham M, Marsh J, Dawson G. Single-suture craniosynostosis: A review of neurobehavioral research and theory. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29:651–668.
Chieffo D, Tamburrini G, Massimi L, et al. Long-term neuropsychological development in single-suture craniosynostosis treated early. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5:232–237.
Osborn AJ, Roberts RM, Mathias JL, Anderson PJ, Flapper WJ. Cognitive, behavioral and psychological functioning in children with metopic synostosis: A meta-analysis examining the impact of surgical status. Child Neuropsychol. 2019;25:263–277.
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:49–100.
Benton AL. Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 1968;6:53–60.
Soares JM, Sampaio A, Marques P, et al. Plasticity of resting state brain networks in recovery from stress. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:919.
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:676–682.
Bierzynska M, Bielecki M, Marchewka A, et al. Effect of frustration on brain activation pattern in subjects with different temperament. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1989.
Ding WN, Sun JH, Sun YW, et al. Trait impulsivity and impaired prefrontal impulse inhibition function in adolescents with internet gaming addiction revealed by a Go/No-Go fMRI study. Behav Brain Funct. 2014;10:20.
Bunge SA, Dudukovic NM, Thomason ME, Vaidya CJ, Gabrieli JD. Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron 2002;33:301–311.
Bottero L, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:952–958; discussion 959–960.
Gioia GA, Andrwes K, Isquith PK. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). 1996.Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW, Vannest KJ. Kreutzer JS, DeLuca J, Caplan B. Behavior assessment system for children (BASC). In: Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2011:New York: Springer; 366–371.
Beckett JS, Brooks ED, Lacadie C, et al. Altered brain connectivity in sagittal craniosynostosis: Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13:690–698.
Simmonds DJ, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH. Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:224–232.
Beckett JS, Chadha P, Persing JA, Steinbacher DM. Classification of trigonocephaly in metopic synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:442e–447e.
Baumann O, Mattingley JB. Functional topography of primary emotion processing in the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 2012;61:805–811.
Lanius RA, Williamson PC, Hopper J, et al. Recall of emotional states in posttraumatic stress disorder: An fMRI investigation. Biol Psychiatry 2003;53:204–210.
Haldane M, Cunningham G, Androutsos C, Frangou S. Structural brain correlates of response inhibition in bipolar disorder I. J Psychopharmacol. 2008;22:138–143.
Koric L, Volle E, Seassau M, et al. How cognitive performance-induced stress can influence right VLPFC activation: An fMRI study in healthy subjects and in patients with social phobia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1973–1986.
Deveney CM, Connolly ME, Haring CT, et al. Neural mechanisms of frustration in chronically irritable children. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:1186–1194.
Levy RL, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, Dagi LR. Astigmatism in unilateral coronal synostosis: Incidence and laterality. J AAPOS 2007;11:367–372.
Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 1997;275:1593–1599.
Yang JF, Brooks ED, Hashim PW, et al. The severity of deformity in metopic craniosynostosis is correlated with the degree of neurologic dysfunction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:442–447.
Griffiths IR. Vasogenic edema following acute and chronic spinal cord compression in the dog. J Neurosurg. 1975;42:155–165.
Miller JD, Stanek AE, Langfitt TW. Cerebral blood flow regulation during experimental brain compression. J Neurosurg. 1973;39:186–196.
David LR, Genecov DG, Camastra AA, Wilson JA, Argenta LC. Positron emission tomography studies confirm the need for early surgical intervention in patients with single-suture craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10:38–42.
David LR, Wilson JA, Watson NE, Argenta LC. Cerebral perfusion defects secondary to simple craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 1996;7:177–185.
Hammond WA. Cerebral Hyperaemia: The Result of Mental Strain or Emotional Disturbance. 1895.New York: Brentano’s.
Sun AH, Eilbott J, Chuang C, et al. Whole-brain intrinsic connectivity in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open 2017;5(Suppl):89.