Blame it on the injury: Trauma is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy compared with elective resection.
Adult
Clinical Decision-Making
Drainage
/ instrumentation
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreas
/ injuries
Pancreatectomy
/ adverse effects
Pancreatic Fistula
/ etiology
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Wound Infection
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
30
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). There is a lack of information regarding the impact of trauma on POPF rates when compared with elective resection. We hypothesize that trauma will be a significant risk factor for the development of POPF following DP. A retrospective, single-institution review of all patients undergoing DP from 1999 to 2017 was performed. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing DP for traumatic injury to those undergoing elective resection. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4). Of the 372 patients who underwent DP during the study period, 298 met inclusion criteria: 38 DPs for trauma (TDP), 260 elective DPs (EDP). Clinically significant grade B or C POPFs occurred in 17 (44.7%) of 38 TDPs compared with 41 (15.8%) of 260 EDPs (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, traumatic injury was found to be independently predictive of developing a grade B or C POPF (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-8.89). Age, sex, and wound infection were highly correlated with traumatic etiology and therefore were not retained in the multivariable model. When analyzing risk factors for each group (trauma vs. elective) separately, we found that TDP patients who developed POPFs had less sutured closure of their duct, higher infectious complications, and longer hospital stays, while EDP patients that suffered POPFs were more likely to be male, younger in age, and at a greater risk for infectious complications. Lastly, in a subgroup analysis involving only patients with drains left postoperatively, trauma was an independent predictor of any grade of fistula (A, B, or C) compared with elective DP (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.09-24.15), suggesting that traumatic injury is risk factor for pancreatic stump closure disruption following DP. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of patients comparing pancreatic leak rates in traumatic versus elective DP, and demonstrates that traumatic injury is an independent risk factor for developing an ISGPF grade B or C pancreatic fistula following DP. Prognostic study, Therapeutic, level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). There is a lack of information regarding the impact of trauma on POPF rates when compared with elective resection. We hypothesize that trauma will be a significant risk factor for the development of POPF following DP.
METHODS
A retrospective, single-institution review of all patients undergoing DP from 1999 to 2017 was performed. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing DP for traumatic injury to those undergoing elective resection. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4).
RESULTS
Of the 372 patients who underwent DP during the study period, 298 met inclusion criteria: 38 DPs for trauma (TDP), 260 elective DPs (EDP). Clinically significant grade B or C POPFs occurred in 17 (44.7%) of 38 TDPs compared with 41 (15.8%) of 260 EDPs (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, traumatic injury was found to be independently predictive of developing a grade B or C POPF (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-8.89). Age, sex, and wound infection were highly correlated with traumatic etiology and therefore were not retained in the multivariable model. When analyzing risk factors for each group (trauma vs. elective) separately, we found that TDP patients who developed POPFs had less sutured closure of their duct, higher infectious complications, and longer hospital stays, while EDP patients that suffered POPFs were more likely to be male, younger in age, and at a greater risk for infectious complications. Lastly, in a subgroup analysis involving only patients with drains left postoperatively, trauma was an independent predictor of any grade of fistula (A, B, or C) compared with elective DP (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.09-24.15), suggesting that traumatic injury is risk factor for pancreatic stump closure disruption following DP.
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of patients comparing pancreatic leak rates in traumatic versus elective DP, and demonstrates that traumatic injury is an independent risk factor for developing an ISGPF grade B or C pancreatic fistula following DP.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic study, Therapeutic, level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31765347
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002495
pii: 01586154-201912000-00007
pmc: PMC7799849
mid: NIHMS1537942
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1289-1300Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA126607
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM104938
Pays : United States
Références
Am J Surg. 2002 Mar;183(3):237-41
pubmed: 11943118
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Oct;399(7):811-24
pubmed: 24962147
Am Surg. 2016 Jun;82(6):526-32
pubmed: 27305885
Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):76-87
pubmed: 22750973
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jan;82(1):185-199
pubmed: 27787438
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):1051-8
pubmed: 23360918
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 12;2:107
pubmed: 29354764
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 14;13(38):5096-100
pubmed: 17876875
Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):61-5
pubmed: 19054513
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jun;20(5):538-44
pubmed: 23430057
Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):86-94
pubmed: 22698935
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):52-9
pubmed: 17617332
J Surg Res. 2017 Sep;217:226-231
pubmed: 28602224
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Feb;34(1):3-10
pubmed: 26815484
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Oct;12(10):1691-7; discussion 1697-8
pubmed: 18704597
Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):539-46
pubmed: 15852419
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jun;59(116):1270-3
pubmed: 22414545
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):690-700
pubmed: 24297652
Am J Surg. 2010 Sep;200(3):311-7
pubmed: 20381788
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203841
pubmed: 30212577
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Sep;96(6):427-33
pubmed: 25198973
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Aug 09;10:103-9
pubmed: 27594995
J Trauma. 2003 Nov;55(5):898-905
pubmed: 14608163
Ann Surg. 2017 Sep;266(3):421-431
pubmed: 28692468
Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22
pubmed: 21529927
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Feb;45(2):401-6
pubmed: 20152361
Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):573-82
pubmed: 17414606
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):518-23
pubmed: 22083531
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1449-56
pubmed: 25903852
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):435-443
pubmed: 29787527
J Korean Med Sci. 2008 Feb;23(1):126-30
pubmed: 18303212
J Trauma. 1990 Nov;30(11):1427-9
pubmed: 2231822
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):413-9; discussion 419-20
pubmed: 19451482
Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):529-36
pubmed: 20538249
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):830-6
pubmed: 25724398
World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1866-73
pubmed: 22526040
Ann Surg. 1998 Jun;227(6):861-9
pubmed: 9637549
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Jul;95(1):29-36
pubmed: 29963537
J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1600-6
pubmed: 1749029
World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):121-5
pubmed: 20020297
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):4-15
pubmed: 25388952
Tunis Med. 2012 Feb;90(2):148-53
pubmed: 22407627
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9
pubmed: 25046131