Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.


Journal

Prosthetics and orthotics international
ISSN: 1746-1553
Titre abrégé: Prosthet Orthot Int
Pays: France
ID NLM: 7707720

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 27 11 2019
medline: 8 7 2020
entrez: 27 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical utility of measuring pressure at the prosthetic socket-residual limb interface is currently unknown. This study aimed to identify whether measuring interface pressure during prosthetic design and fabrication results in closer agreement in pressure measurements between sockets made by different clinicians, and a reduction in pressure over areas of concern. It also investigated whether clinicians value knowing the interface pressure during the fabrication process. Mixed methods. Three prosthetists designed a complete prosthetic system for a transtibial residual limb surrogate. Standardised mechanical testing was performed on each prosthetic system to gain pressure measurements at four key anatomical locations. These measurements were provided to the clinicians, who subsequently modified their sockets as each saw fit. The pressure at each location was re-measured. Each prosthetist completed a survey that evaluated the usefulness of knowing interface pressures during the fabrication process. Feedback and subsequent socket modifications saw a reduction in the pressure measurements at three of the four anatomical locations. Furthermore, the pressure measurements between prosthetists converged. All three prosthetists found value in the pressure measurement system and felt they would use it clinically. Results suggest that sensors measuring pressure at the socket-limb interface has clinical utility in the context of informing prosthetic socket design and fabrication. If the technology is used at the check socket stage, iterative designs with repeated measurements can result in increased consistency between clinicians for the same residual limb, and reductions in the magnitudes of pressures over specific anatomical landmarks. This study provides new information on the value of pressure feedback to the prosthetic socket design process. It shows that with feedback, socket modifications can result in reduced limb pressures, and more consistent pressure distributions between prosthetists. It also justifies the use of pressure feedback in informing clinical decisions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The clinical utility of measuring pressure at the prosthetic socket-residual limb interface is currently unknown.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to identify whether measuring interface pressure during prosthetic design and fabrication results in closer agreement in pressure measurements between sockets made by different clinicians, and a reduction in pressure over areas of concern. It also investigated whether clinicians value knowing the interface pressure during the fabrication process.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Mixed methods.
METHODS METHODS
Three prosthetists designed a complete prosthetic system for a transtibial residual limb surrogate. Standardised mechanical testing was performed on each prosthetic system to gain pressure measurements at four key anatomical locations. These measurements were provided to the clinicians, who subsequently modified their sockets as each saw fit. The pressure at each location was re-measured. Each prosthetist completed a survey that evaluated the usefulness of knowing interface pressures during the fabrication process.
RESULTS RESULTS
Feedback and subsequent socket modifications saw a reduction in the pressure measurements at three of the four anatomical locations. Furthermore, the pressure measurements between prosthetists converged. All three prosthetists found value in the pressure measurement system and felt they would use it clinically.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that sensors measuring pressure at the socket-limb interface has clinical utility in the context of informing prosthetic socket design and fabrication. If the technology is used at the check socket stage, iterative designs with repeated measurements can result in increased consistency between clinicians for the same residual limb, and reductions in the magnitudes of pressures over specific anatomical landmarks.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE CONCLUSIONS
This study provides new information on the value of pressure feedback to the prosthetic socket design process. It shows that with feedback, socket modifications can result in reduced limb pressures, and more consistent pressure distributions between prosthetists. It also justifies the use of pressure feedback in informing clinical decisions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31769736
doi: 10.1177/0309364619868364
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18-26

Auteurs

Lucy Armitage (L)

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Angela Buller (A)

OAPL, Redfern, NSW, Australia.

Ginu Rajan (G)

School of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Gangadhara Prusty (G)

School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Anne Simmons (A)

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Lauren Kark (L)

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH