Drug Coated Balloon-Only Strategy in De Novo Lesions of Large Coronary Vessels.
Aged
Coronary Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Size
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Propensity Score
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiology
ISSN: 1540-8183
Titre abrégé: J Interv Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8907826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
05
11
2018
revised:
07
01
2019
accepted:
17
01
2019
entrez:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
29
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We analyzed the efficacy of drug coated balloons (DCB) as a stand-alone-therapy in de novo lesions of large coronary arteries. DCBs seem to be an attractive alternative for the stent-free interventional treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data regarding a DCB-only approach in de novo CAD are currently limited to vessels of small caliber. By means of propensity score (PS) matching 234 individuals with de novo CAD were identified with similar demographic characteristics. This patient population was stratified in a 1:1 fashion according to a reference vessel diameter cut-off of 2.75 mm in small and large vessel disease. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months. Patients with small vessel disease had an average reference diameter of 2.45 ± 0.23 mm, while the large vessel group averaged 3.16 ± 0.27 mm. Regarding 9-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE), 5.7% of the patients with small and 6.1% of the patients with large vessels had MACE (p=0.903). Analysis of the individual MACE components revealed a TLR rate of 3.8% in small and 1.0% in large vessels (p=0.200). Of note, no thrombotic events in the DCB treated coronary segments occurred in either group during the 9-month follow-up. Our data demonstrate for the first time that DCB-only PCI of de novo lesions in large coronary arteries (>2.75 mm) is safe and as effective. Interventional treatment for CAD without permanent or temporary scaffolding, demonstrated a similar efficacy for large and small vessels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31772539
doi: 10.1155/2019/6548696
pmc: PMC6739788
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6548696Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Mark Rosenberg et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Mark Rosenberg received minor personal fees for lectures. Matthias Waliszewski is an employee at Medical Scientific Affairs, B. Braun Melsungen AG. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15
pubmed: 26457558
EuroIntervention. 2011 May;7 Suppl K:K57-60
pubmed: 22027729
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Jul-Sep;11(3):189-98
pubmed: 20599174
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E277-E286
pubmed: 30489687
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):181-188
pubmed: 30280482
Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1908-1919
pubmed: 28844989
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315
pubmed: 26320110
Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Mar;99(3):165-74
pubmed: 20052480
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51
pubmed: 17470709
Circulation. 1998 Nov 3;98(18):1875-80
pubmed: 9799207
Heart. 2014 Feb;100(4):311-6
pubmed: 24281754
EuroIntervention. 2013 Sep;9(5):613-9
pubmed: 24058077
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1733-8
pubmed: 23040575
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):849-856
pubmed: 30170854
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):16-25b
pubmed: 22041548
EuroIntervention. 2014 Sep;10(5):591-9
pubmed: 24345357
Heart. 2010 Aug;96(16):1291-6
pubmed: 20659948
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 6;362(18):1663-74
pubmed: 20445180
Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Nov;102(11):785-97
pubmed: 23982467
Circ J. 2011;75(5):1120-9
pubmed: 21467655