Prognostic value of CEC count in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy: a prospective validation study (UCBG COMET).
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Biomarkers, Pharmacological
/ analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms, Male
/ diagnosis
Cell Count
Endothelial Cells
/ drug effects
Female
Genes, erbB-2
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
/ drug effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Bevacizumab
Breast cancer
Circulating endothelial cells
Journal
Angiogenesis
ISSN: 1573-7209
Titre abrégé: Angiogenesis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9814575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2019
accepted:
16
11
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
14
1
2021
entrez:
28
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proof of concept studies has reported that circulating endothelial cell (CEC) count may be associated with the outcome of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated by chemotherapy and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. We report the results obtained in an independent prospective validation cohort (COMET study, NCT01745757). The main baseline criteria were HER2-negative mBC, performance status 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. CECs were detected by CellSearch® from 4 ml of blood at baseline and after 4 weeks of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab therapy. CEC counts (considered both as a continuous variable and using the previously described 20 CEC/4 ml cutoff) were associated with clinical characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS). CEC count was obtained in 251 patients at baseline and in 207 patients at 4 weeks. Median baseline CEC count was 22 CEC/4 ml (range 0-2231). Baseline CEC counts were associated with performance status (p = 0.02). No statistically significant change in CEC counts was observed between baseline and 4 weeks of therapy. High baseline CEC count was associated with shorter PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses (continuous: p < 0.001; dichotomized: HR 1.52, 95% CI [1.15-2.02], p = 0.004). CEC counts at 4 weeks had no prognostic impact. This study confirms that CEC count may be associated with the outcome of mBC patients treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. However, discrepancies with previous reports in terms of both the timing of CEC count and the direction of the prognostic impact warrant further clinical investigation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Proof of concept studies has reported that circulating endothelial cell (CEC) count may be associated with the outcome of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated by chemotherapy and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. We report the results obtained in an independent prospective validation cohort (COMET study, NCT01745757).
METHODS
The main baseline criteria were HER2-negative mBC, performance status 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. CECs were detected by CellSearch® from 4 ml of blood at baseline and after 4 weeks of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab therapy. CEC counts (considered both as a continuous variable and using the previously described 20 CEC/4 ml cutoff) were associated with clinical characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
CEC count was obtained in 251 patients at baseline and in 207 patients at 4 weeks. Median baseline CEC count was 22 CEC/4 ml (range 0-2231). Baseline CEC counts were associated with performance status (p = 0.02). No statistically significant change in CEC counts was observed between baseline and 4 weeks of therapy. High baseline CEC count was associated with shorter PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses (continuous: p < 0.001; dichotomized: HR 1.52, 95% CI [1.15-2.02], p = 0.004). CEC counts at 4 weeks had no prognostic impact.
CONCLUSION
This study confirms that CEC count may be associated with the outcome of mBC patients treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. However, discrepancies with previous reports in terms of both the timing of CEC count and the direction of the prognostic impact warrant further clinical investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31773439
doi: 10.1007/s10456-019-09697-7
pii: 10.1007/s10456-019-09697-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Pharmacological
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01745757']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM