Evaluation of Patch Test Findings in Patients With Anogenital Dermatitis.
Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Aged
Allergens
/ immunology
Anesthetics
/ adverse effects
Anus Diseases
/ diagnosis
Cosmetics
/ adverse effects
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
/ diagnosis
Female
Genital Diseases, Female
/ diagnosis
Genital Diseases, Male
/ diagnosis
Glucocorticoids
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
North America
/ epidemiology
Patch Tests
/ statistics & numerical data
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA dermatology
ISSN: 2168-6084
Titre abrégé: JAMA Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589530
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2020
01 01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
6
11
2020
entrez:
28
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contact dermatitis in the anogenital area is associated with sleep disturbance and dyspareunia and can profoundly affect quality of life. The literature on anogenital contact dermatitis and culprit allergens is limited. The last large-scale study on common, relevant allergens in patients with anogenital dermatitis was published in 2008. To characterize patients with anogenital dermatitis referred for patch testing by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, to identify common allergens, and to explore sex-associated differences between anogenital dermatitis and allergens. A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group database among 28 481 patients who underwent patch testing from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016, at outpatient referral clinics in the United States and Canada. Patch testing for allergens. Currently relevant allergic patch test reactions in patients with anogenital dermatitis. Of 28 481 patients tested during the study period, 832 patients (336 men and 496 women; mean [SD] age, 50.1 [26.5] years) had anogenital involvement and 449 patients (177 men and 272 women; mean [SD] age, 49.6 [17.4] years) had anogenital dermatitis only. Compared with those without anogenital involvement, there were significantly more male patients in the group with anogenital dermatitis (177 [39.4%] vs 8857 of 27 649 [32.0%]; relative risk, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.66; P < .001). In the group with anogenital involvement, female patients were significantly less likely than male patients to have allergic contact dermatitis as a final diagnosis (130 [47.8%] vs 107 [60.5%]; relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94; P = .01), whereas a final diagnosis of other dermatoses (eg, lichen planus, lichen sclerosus, or lichen simplex chronicus) was more frequent for female patients than for male patients (67 [24.6%] vs 28 [15.8%]; relative risk, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02-2.31; P = .03). Of the 449 patients in the group with anogenital involvement only, 227 (50.6%) had 1 or more relevant reaction with patch testing. Allergens that were statistically significantly more common in patients with anogenital involvement compared with those without anogenital involvement included medicaments such as dibucaine (10 of 250 patients tested [4.0%] vs 32 of 17 494 patients tested [0.2%]; relative risk, 22.74; 95% CI, 11.05-46.78; P < .001) and preservatives such as methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone (30 of 449 patients tested [6.7%] vs 1143 of 27 599 patients tested [4.1%]; relative risk, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.41; P = .008). A total of 152 patients met the definition for anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, which is defined as anogenital involvement only, allergic contact dermatitis as the only diagnosis, and 1 or more positive reaction of current clinical relevance. For patients with anogenital involvement only who were referred for patch testing, male patients were more likely to have allergic contact dermatitis, whereas female patients were more likely to have other dermatoses. Common allergens or sources consisted of those likely to contact the anogenital area. For individuals with anogenital involvement suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis, reactions to preservatives, fragrances, medications (particularly topical anesthetics), and topical corticosteroids should be tested.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31774454
pii: 2755536
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3844
pmc: PMC6902099
doi:
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Anesthetics
0
Cosmetics
0
Glucocorticoids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
85-91Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Dermatitis. 2018 May/Jun;29(3):112-119
pubmed: 29698355
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2009;17(4):285-8
pubmed: 20021983
Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011;40:133-141
pubmed: 21325848
Dermatitis. 2010 Jan-Feb;21(1):59-60
pubmed: 20137741
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019 Jan - Feb;27:134-135
pubmed: 30668987
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Oct;59(4):233-7
pubmed: 18844699
Dermatitis. 2017 Jan/Feb;28(1):33-46
pubmed: 27775967
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Jun;144(6):749-55
pubmed: 18559763
Contact Dermatitis. 2016 May;74(5):298-300
pubmed: 27040873
Dermatitis. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):173-174
pubmed: 30829812
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014 Sep;105(7):694-8
pubmed: 24626103
Australas J Dermatol. 2008 May;49(2):80-5
pubmed: 18412806
Br Med J. 1978 Feb 18;1(6110):415-6
pubmed: 624038
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Sep;45(3):377-81
pubmed: 11511833
Dermatitis. 2010 Nov-Dec;21(6):317-20
pubmed: 21144343
Dermatitis. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):50-5
pubmed: 21291644