Clinical risk assessment in early pregnancy for preeclampsia in nulliparous women: A population based cohort study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2019
accepted:
11
11
2019
entrez:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
26
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the capacity of multivariable prediction of preeclampsia during pregnancy, based on detailed routinely collected early pregnancy data in nulliparous women. A population-based cohort study of 62 562 pregnancies of nulliparous women with deliveries 2008-13 in the Stockholm-Gotland Counties in Sweden. Maternal social, reproductive and medical history and medical examinations (including mean arterial pressure, proteinuria, hemoglobin and capillary glucose levels) routinely collected at the first visit in antenatal care, constitute the predictive variables. Predictive models for preeclampsia were created by three methods; logistic regression models using 1) pre-specified variables (similar to the Fetal Medicine Foundation model including maternal factors and mean arterial pressure), 2) backward selection starting from the full suite of variables, and 3) a Random forest model using the same candidate variables. The performance of the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) binary risk classification guidelines for preeclampsia was also evaluated. The outcome measures were diagnosis of preeclampsia with delivery <34, <37, and ≥37 weeks' gestation. A total of 2 773 (4.4%) nulliparous women subsequently developed preeclampsia. The pre-specified variables model was superior the other two models, regarding prediction of preeclampsia with delivery <34 and <37 weeks, both with areas under the curve of 0.68, and sensitivity of 30.6% (95% CI 24.5-37.2) and 29.2% (95% CI 25.2-33.4) at a 10% false positive rate, respectively. The performance of these customizable multivariable models at the chosen false positive rate, was significantly better than the binary NICE-guidelines for preeclampsia with delivery <37 and ≥37 weeks' gestation. Multivariable models in early pregnancy had a modest performance, although providing advantages over the NICE-guidelines, in predicting preeclampsia in nulliparous women. Use of a machine learning algorithm (Random forest) did not result in superior prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31774875
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225716
pii: PONE-D-19-13973
pmc: PMC6881002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0225716Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):999-1011
pubmed: 26342729
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120(10):1215-23
pubmed: 23906160
BMJ. 2011 Apr 07;342:d1875
pubmed: 21474517
BMJ. 2009 Jun 18;338:b2255
pubmed: 19541696
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jul;34(7):618-27
pubmed: 24764257
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622
pubmed: 28657417
BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1441-52
pubmed: 27225348
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):751-755
pubmed: 28067011
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Sep 05;147:w14498
pubmed: 28871576
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):62.e1-62.e10
pubmed: 25724400
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):287-293.e1
pubmed: 29138036
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1925-31
pubmed: 24898551
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):743-750
pubmed: 29536574
BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753
pubmed: 27094586
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jun;107(6):938-944
pubmed: 28426306
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1122-31
pubmed: 24150027
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;204(2):148.e1-6
pubmed: 21055722
BMJ. 2009 Mar 31;338:b604
pubmed: 19336487
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Dec 1;91:103-111
pubmed: 29049908
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):391-403
pubmed: 21333604
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(6):381-393
pubmed: 30021205
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7
pubmed: 25981519
JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):551-2
pubmed: 26864406
J Perinat Med. 2008;36(2):115-9
pubmed: 18331205
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Jul;13:291-310
pubmed: 29803330
Hypertension. 2012 Jun;59(6):1241-8
pubmed: 22526257
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Jan;32(2):286-292
pubmed: 28889785
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;44(3):279-85
pubmed: 24913190
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1747-55
pubmed: 23683641
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2008 Jan;14(1):19-28
pubmed: 18182680
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):e44-e52
pubmed: 29939940
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):631-44
pubmed: 20598363
BJOG. 2015 Jun;122(7):904-14
pubmed: 25761437
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):726-35
pubmed: 16897791
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;33(1):8-15
pubmed: 22906914
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):103.e1-103.e12
pubmed: 26297382