EMG-based vibro-tactile biofeedback training: effective learning accelerator for children and adolescents with dystonia? A pilot crossover trial.
Biofeedback
Dystonia
EMG
Learning
Sensory-motor deficits
Wearable devices
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2019
27 11 2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
accepted:
06
11
2019
entrez:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study is aimed at better understanding the role of a wearable and silent ElectroMyoGraphy-based biofeedback on motor learning in children and adolescents with primary and secondary dystonia. A crossover study with a wash-out period of at least 1 week was designed; the device provides the patient with a vibration proportional to the activation of an impaired target muscle. The protocol consisted of two 5-day blocks during which subjects were trained and tested on a figure-8 writing task: their performances (at different levels of difficulty) were evaluated in terms of both kinematics and muscular activations on day 1 and day 5, while the other 3 days were purely used as training sessions. The training was performed with and without using the biofeedback device: the week of use was randomized. Data were collected on 14 subjects with primary and secondary (acquired) dystonia (age: 6-19 years). Results comparing kinematic-based and EMG-based outcome measures pre- and post-training showed learning due to practice for both subjects with primary and secondary dystonia. On top of said learning, an improvement in terms of inter-joint coordination and muscular pattern functionality was recorded only for secondary dystonia subjects, when trained with the aid of the EMG-based biofeedback device. Our results support the hypothesis that children and adolescents with primary dystonia in which there is intact sensory processing do not benefit from feedback augmentation, whereas children with secondary dystonia, in which sensory deficits are often present, exhibit a higher learning capacity when augmented movement-related sensory information is provided. This study represents a fundamental investigation to address the scarcity of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for young subjects with dystonia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This study is aimed at better understanding the role of a wearable and silent ElectroMyoGraphy-based biofeedback on motor learning in children and adolescents with primary and secondary dystonia.
METHODS
A crossover study with a wash-out period of at least 1 week was designed; the device provides the patient with a vibration proportional to the activation of an impaired target muscle. The protocol consisted of two 5-day blocks during which subjects were trained and tested on a figure-8 writing task: their performances (at different levels of difficulty) were evaluated in terms of both kinematics and muscular activations on day 1 and day 5, while the other 3 days were purely used as training sessions. The training was performed with and without using the biofeedback device: the week of use was randomized. Data were collected on 14 subjects with primary and secondary (acquired) dystonia (age: 6-19 years).
RESULTS
Results comparing kinematic-based and EMG-based outcome measures pre- and post-training showed learning due to practice for both subjects with primary and secondary dystonia. On top of said learning, an improvement in terms of inter-joint coordination and muscular pattern functionality was recorded only for secondary dystonia subjects, when trained with the aid of the EMG-based biofeedback device.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results support the hypothesis that children and adolescents with primary dystonia in which there is intact sensory processing do not benefit from feedback augmentation, whereas children with secondary dystonia, in which sensory deficits are often present, exhibit a higher learning capacity when augmented movement-related sensory information is provided. This study represents a fundamental investigation to address the scarcity of noninvasive therapeutic interventions for young subjects with dystonia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31775780
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0620-y
pii: 10.1186/s12984-019-0620-y
pmc: PMC6882366
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
150Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD081346
Pays : United States
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 11;11(10):e0164511
pubmed: 27727321
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1839-45
pubmed: 17182908
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Jul 23;9:46
pubmed: 22824547
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Oct;19(10):1292-9
pubmed: 22289078
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 1;9(1):3303
pubmed: 30824830
J Child Neurol. 2017 Feb;32(2):161-169
pubmed: 27798370
Nature. 1998 Aug 20;394(6695):780-4
pubmed: 9723616
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 09;12:112
pubmed: 26651329
J Child Neurol. 2011 Jul;26(7):822-9
pubmed: 21421904
J Child Neurol. 2007 Mar;22(3):289-93
pubmed: 17621498
Mov Disord. 2003 Mar;18(3):231-40
pubmed: 12621626
J Child Neurol. 2010 Dec;25(12):1480-4
pubmed: 20525944
J Child Neurol. 2011 Jan;26(1):37-43
pubmed: 20525943
J Hand Ther. 2015 Apr-Jun;28(2):185-93; quiz 194
pubmed: 25835254
Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Sep 04;12:37
pubmed: 30233334
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 May;21(3):474-80
pubmed: 23060345
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jan;91(1):1-8.e1
pubmed: 20103390
Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1538-49
pubmed: 20589866
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Aug 24;8:47
pubmed: 21861930
Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3613-8
pubmed: 25227075
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;6:2
pubmed: 22291623
J Child Neurol. 2015 Oct;30(12):1676-85
pubmed: 25895910
Mov Disord. 2013 May;28(5):647-54
pubmed: 23408442
Artif Organs. 2010 Aug;34(8):663-7
pubmed: 20528850
Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86
pubmed: 15265326
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(17):1488-94
pubmed: 22304672
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Jun 12;12:52
pubmed: 26068444
Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2175-82
pubmed: 12821512
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73
pubmed: 23649720
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:23-32
pubmed: 26163375
Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1195-212
pubmed: 9679773