Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence and Potency: A Randomized Exploration Study Protocol.
Aged
Amnion
/ transplantation
Chorion
/ transplantation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Prostatectomy
/ methods
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ surgery
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence
/ etiology
Amniotic membrane
Erectile dysfunction
IDEAL recommendations
Incontinence
Prostatectomy
Surgical innovation
Urology
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
24
09
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
30
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Incontinence (up to 20%) and erectile dysfunction (up to 70%) occur frequently after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with localized prostate cancer. Human amniotic membrane (HAM) can improve tissue regeneration and functional outcome after RP owing to the growth factors and unique immune tolerance. Preliminary studies showed the potential value of HAM in the reconstruction of the urinary tract and nerve protection during RP. A protocol is developed for a prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-surgeon, placebo-controlled exploration study of the efficacy and safety of dehydrated human amnion membrane placed around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) during RP for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eligible for inclusion are patients with localized prostate cancer, requiring a surgical procedure and exclusion of preoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The patients are randomized 1:1 to HAM vs. placebo and blinded during the study period. According to the T test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% and expecting a dropout of 20% of the patients, an adjusted sample size per arm of 164 patients is required. The primary outcome is a postoperative continence measured as 24-h pad test up to 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are potency, time of postoperative catheter removal, postoperative complications, and biochemical recurrence. The protocol for this randomized exploration study defines the conditions to assess the efficacy and safety of HAM application during RP in order to improve the postoperative functional outcome. This trial should pave the way for future studies of tissue engineering in an effort to reduce the morbidity of RP. Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03864939.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31782131
doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01158-3
pii: 10.1007/s12325-019-01158-3
pmc: PMC6979451
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03864939']
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.10283555']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
592-602Références
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):977-980
pubmed: 25613153
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Mar 11;14(4):310-318
pubmed: 28553162
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(1):77-81
pubmed: 17117174
Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan 15;66:335-349
pubmed: 29191510
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17
pubmed: 22749852
Int Wound J. 2013 Oct;10(5):502-7
pubmed: 23742102
Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):936-944
pubmed: 27720536
BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):859-62
pubmed: 15270937
Urologe A. 2004 Feb;43(2):128-32
pubmed: 14991112
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):324
pubmed: 15592108
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1212-5
pubmed: 14767304
Clin Anat. 2015 Oct;28(7):896-902
pubmed: 26194970
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;51:11-13
pubmed: 30130666
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(4):459-61
pubmed: 26855802
Surg Innov. 2017 Aug;24(4):313-320
pubmed: 28548553
BMJ. 2016 Jun 09;353:i2372
pubmed: 27283585
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):327-338
pubmed: 28478521
Wounds. 2012 Oct;24(10):299-307
pubmed: 25876055
Biol Reprod. 2007 Sep;77(3):577-88
pubmed: 17494917
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):197-203
pubmed: 641084
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1348-53
pubmed: 24094657
Int J Oncol. 2017 Nov;51(5):1405-1414
pubmed: 29048644
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9:CD009625
pubmed: 28895658
Urologe A. 2009 Apr;48(4):408-14
pubmed: 19145427
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060
pubmed: 30017351
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Aug;70(4):401-407
pubmed: 29595041
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):475-481
pubmed: 30209677
J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2527-31
pubmed: 18930493
Cornea. 1995 Sep;14(5):473-84
pubmed: 8536460
Cytotherapy. 2014 Jan;16(1):33-40
pubmed: 24113429
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296
pubmed: 16280816
Cell Tissue Bank. 2013 Sep;14(3):475-88
pubmed: 22926336
Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30
pubmed: 9187685
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):92-98
pubmed: 27751731
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12
pubmed: 19782876
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):235-243
pubmed: 28656504
Urology. 2013 Jan;81(1):56-60
pubmed: 23122544
World J Mens Health. 2016 Aug;34(2):73-88
pubmed: 27574591
Br J Urol. 1975 Oct;47(5):549-58
pubmed: 1191926