Estimating overdispersion in sparse multinomial data.

Dirichlet-multinomial lack-of-fit mark-recapture multinomial overdispersion sparse data

Journal

Biometrics
ISSN: 1541-0420
Titre abrégé: Biometrics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370625

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 02 03 2019
revised: 11 11 2019
accepted: 14 11 2019
pubmed: 1 12 2019
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 1 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multinomial data arise in many areas of the life sciences, such as mark-recapture studies and phylogenetics, and will often by overdispersed, with the variance being higher than predicted by a multinomial model. The quasi-likelihood approach to modeling this overdispersion involves the assumption that the variance is proportional to that specified by the multinomial model. As this approach does not require specification of the full distribution of the response variable, it can be more robust than fitting a Dirichlet-multinomial model or adding a random effect to the linear predictor. Estimation of the amount of overdispersion is often based on Pearson's statistic X

Identifiants

pubmed: 31785150
doi: 10.1111/biom.13194
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

834-842

Subventions

Organisme : University of Otago
ID : PhD Scholarship

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The International Biometric Society.

Références

Afroz, F. (2018) Estimating overdispersion in sparse multinomial data. PhD thesis, University of Otago, https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/8595.
Bird, S.M. and King, R. (2018) Multiple systems estimation (or capture-recapture estimation) to inform public policy. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5, 95-118.
Brownie, C., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. and Robson, D.S. (1985) Statistical Inference from Band Recovery Data. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication.
Choquet, R., Lebreton, J.-D., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A.-M. and Pradel, R. (2009) U-CARE: utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating capture-recapture data. Ecography, 32, 1071-1074.
Cochran, W.G. (1952) The χ2 test of goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 315-345.
Cooch, E. and White, G. (2014) Program MARK: A Gentle Introduction, 13th edition. http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/.
Dawson, S., Fletcher, D. and Slooten, E. (2013) Habitat use and conservation of an endangered dolphin. Endangered Species Research, 21, 45-54.
Deng, D. and Paul, S.R. (2016) Goodness of fit of product multinomial regression models to sparse data. Sankhya B, 78, 78-95.
Farrington, C.P. (1996) On assessing goodness of fit of generalized linear models to sparse data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58, 349-360.
Fitzmaurice, G.M. (1997) Model selection with overdispersed data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 46, 81-91.
Fletcher, D.J. (2012) Estimating overdispersion when fitting a generalized linear model to sparse data. Biometrika, 99, 230-237.
Gimenez, O. and Choquet, R. (2010) Individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models. Ecology, 91, 951-957.
Hartzel, J., Agresti, A., and Caffo, B. (2001) Multinomial logit random effects models. Statistical Modelling, 1, 81-102.
Koehler, K.J. (1986) Goodness-of-fit tests for log-linear models in sparse contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 483-493.
Koehler, K.J. and Larntz, K. (1980) An empirical investigation of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 336-344.
Larntz, K. (1978) Small-sample comparisons of exact levels for chi-squared goodness-of-fit statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 253-263.
Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D.R. (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62, 67-118.
Link, W.A. and Sauer, J.R. (1997) Estimation of population trajectories from count data. Biometrics, 53, 488-497.
MacKenzie, D.I. and Bailey, L.L. (2004) Assessing the fit of site-occupancy models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 300-318.
McClintock, B.T. and White, G.C. (2012) From noremark to mark: software for estimating demographic parameters using mark-resight methodology. Journal of Ornithology, 152, 641-650.
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J.A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall.
Milliken, G.A. and Johnson, D.E. (2017) Analysis of Messy Data, Volume II: Nonreplicated Experiments. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Mosimann, J.E. (1962) On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate β-distribution, and correlations among proportions. Biometrika, 49, 65-82.
Nichols, J.D. and Kendall, W.L. (1995) The use of multi-state capture-recapture models to address questions in evolutionary ecology. Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 835-846.
Paul, S.R. and Deng, D. (2000) Goodness of fit of generalized linear models to sparse data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62, 323-333.
Shepherd, D. and Klaere, S. (2018) How well does your phylogenetic model fit your data? Systematic Biology, 68, 157-167.
Simonoff, J.S. (1993) The relative importance of bias and variability in the estimation of the variance of a statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 42, 3-7.
White, G.C. (2002) Discussion comments on: the use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture modelling. An overview. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 103-106.

Auteurs

Farzana Afroz (F)

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Matt Parry (M)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

David Fletcher (D)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Clinical Competence Male Female

A computational model for bacteriophage ϕX174 gene expression.

Alexis M Hill, Tanvi A Ingle, Claus O Wilke
1.00
Gene Expression Regulation, Viral Promoter Regions, Genetic Bacteriophage phi X 174 Computer Simulation Models, Genetic

Classifications MeSH