Coarse-grained and atomic resolution biomolecular docking with the ATTRACT approach.


Journal

Proteins
ISSN: 1097-0134
Titre abrégé: Proteins
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8700181

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 15 09 2019
revised: 20 11 2019
accepted: 27 11 2019
pubmed: 1 12 2019
medline: 26 1 2021
entrez: 1 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ATTRACT protein-protein docking program has been employed to predict protein-protein complex structures in CAPRI rounds 38-45. For 11 out of 16 targets acceptable or better quality solutions have been submitted (~70%). It includes also several cases of peptide-protein docking and the successful prediction of the geometry of carbohydrate-protein interactions. The option of combining rigid body minimization and simultaneous optimization in collective degrees of freedom based on elastic network modes was employed and systematically evaluated. Application to a large benchmark set indicates a modest improvement in docking performance compared to rigid docking. Possible further improvements of the docking approach in particular at the scoring and the flexible refinement steps are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31785163
doi: 10.1002/prot.25860
doi:

Substances chimiques

Carbohydrates 0
Ligands 0
Peptides 0
Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1018-1028

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

Kundrotas PJ, Anishchenko I, Dauzhenka T, et al. Dockground: a comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes. Protein Sci. 2018;27:172-181.
Lensink MF, Velankar S, Wodak SJ. Modeling protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma. 2017;85:359-377.
Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins. 2010;78:3073-3084.
Lensink MF, Méndez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins. 2007;69:704-718.
Janin J. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: the CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci. 2005;14:278-283.
de Vries SJ, Schindler CEM, Chauvot de Beauchêne I, Zacharias M. A web Interface for easy flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Biophys J. 2015;108:462-465.
Vries S, de Zacharias M. Flexible docking and refinement with a coarse-grained protein model using ATTRACT. Proteins. 2013;81:2167-2174.
Schneider S, Saladin A, Fiorucci S, Prévost C, Zacharias M. ATTRACT and PTOOLS: open source programs for protein-protein docking. In: Baron R, ed. Computational Drug Discovery and Design. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012:221-232.
Schindler CEM, Beauchêne IC, de Vries SJ, de Zacharias M. Protein-protein and peptide-protein docking and refinement using ATTRACT in CAPRI. Proteins. 2017;85:391-398.
May A, Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility. Proteins. 2007;69:774-780.
Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1271-1282.
Fiorucci S, Zacharias M. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Proteins. 2010;78:3131-3139.
May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Proteins Proteom. 2005;1754:225-231.
May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins. 2008;70:794-809.
Schindler CEM, de Vries SJ, Zacharias M. Fully blind peptide-protein docking with pepATTRACT. Structure. 2015;23:1507-1515.
de Vries SJ, Rey J, Schindler CEM, Zacharias M, Tuffery P. The pepATTRACT web server for blind, large-scale peptide-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W361-W364.
Setny P, Bahadur RP, Zacharias M. Protein-DNA docking with a coarse-grained force field. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:228.
Setny P, Zacharias M. A coarse-grained force field for protein-RNA docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:9118-9129.
Setny P, Zacharias M. Elastic network models of nucleic acids flexibility. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013;9:5460-5470.
de VSJ, Zacharias M. ATTRACT-EM: a new method for the computational assembly of large molecular machines using Cryo-EM maps. PLOS One. 2012;7:e49733.
Schindler CEM, de Vries SJ, Sasse A, Zacharias M. SAXS data alone can generate high-quality models of protein-protein complexes. Structure. 2016;24:1387-1397.
Hinsen K. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins. 1998;33:417-429.
Bahar I, Lezon TR, Yang L-W, Eyal E. Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:23-42.
Schindler CEM, Vries SJ, de Zacharias M. iATTRACT: simultaneous global and local interface optimization for protein-protein docking refinement. Proteins. 2015;83:248-258.
Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:11225-11236.
Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W665-W667.
Li H, Robertson AD, Jensen JH. Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values. Proteins. 2005;61:704-721.
Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1668-1688.
Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, Simmerling C. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015;11:3696-3713.
Huang J, MacKerell AD. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. J Comput Chem. 2013;34:2135-2145.
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926-935.
Berendsen HJC, van der SD, van DR. GROMACS-a message-passing parallel molecular-dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun. 1995;91:43-56.
Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem. 1998;19:1639-1662.
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009;30:2785-2791.
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 2006;65:712-725.
Kirschner KN, Yongye AB, Tschampel SM, et al. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates. J Comput Chem. 2008;29:622-655.
Sage J, Mallèvre F, Barbarin-Costes F, et al. Binding of chondroitin 4-sulfate to Cathepsin S regulates its enzymatic activity. Biochemistry. 2013;52:6487-6498.
Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. 6.
Samsonov SA, Gehrcke J-P, Pisabarro MT. Flexibility and explicit solvent in molecular-dynamics-based docking of protein-glycosaminoglycan systems. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:582-592.
Onufriev A, Case DA, Bashford D. Effective born radii in the generalized born approximation: the importance of being perfect. J Comput Chem. 2002;23:1297-1304.
Zacharias M, Sklenar H. Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: application to DNA minor groove ligand complex. J Comput Chem. 1999;20:287-300.
Moal IH, Bates PA. SwarmDock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:3623-3648.
Vreven T, Moal IH, Vangone A, et al. Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:3031-3041.
Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:18908-18913.
Dobbins SE, Lesk VI, Sternberg MJE. Insights into protein flexibility: the relationship between normal modes and conformational change upon protein-protein docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10390-10395.
Grudinin S, Laine E, Hoffmann A. Predicting protein functional motions: an old recipe with a new twist. 2019. Available from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02291552
Bloch Y, Bouchareychas L, Merceron R, et al. Structural activation of pro-inflammatory human cytokine IL-23 by cognate IL-23 receptor enables recruitment of the shared receptor IL-12Rβ1. Immunity. 2018;48:45-58.e6.
Šali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779-815.
Moonens K, Hamway Y, Neddermann M, et al. Helicobacter pylori adhesin HopQ disrupts trans dimerization in human CEACAMs. EMBO J. 2018;37:e98665.
Wojdyla JA, Fleishman SJ, Baker D, Kleanthous C. Structure of the ultra-high-affinity Colicin E2 DNase-Im2 complex. J Mol Biol. 2012;417:79-94.
Maupetit J, Derreumaux P, Tuffery P. PEP-FOLD: an online resource for de novo peptide structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W498-W503.
Kandiah E, Carriel D, Perard J, et al. Structural insights into the Escherichia coli lysine decarboxylases and molecular determinants of interaction with the AAA+ ATPase RavA. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24601-24609.
Andréll J, Hicks MG, Palmer T, Carpenter EP, Iwata S, Maher MJ. Crystal structure of the acid-induced arginine decarboxylase from Escherichia coli: reversible Decamer assembly controls enzyme activity. Biochemistry. 2009;48:3915-3927.
Hoffmann A, Grudinin S. NOLB: nonlinear rigid block Normal-mode analysis method. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13:2123-2134.

Auteurs

Glenn Glashagen (G)

Physik-Department T38, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.

Sjoerd de Vries (S)

Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Ressource Parisienne en Bioinformatique Structurale (RPBS), Paris, France.

Urszula Uciechowska-Kaczmarzyk (U)

Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Sergey A Samsonov (SA)

Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Samuel Murail (S)

Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.

Pierre Tuffery (P)

Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Ressource Parisienne en Bioinformatique Structurale (RPBS), Paris, France.

Martin Zacharias (M)

Physik-Department T38, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH