The influence of alcohol consumption among partners in newly cohabiting relationships.


Journal

Drug and alcohol review
ISSN: 1465-3362
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Rev
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9015440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 06 02 2019
revised: 30 07 2019
accepted: 17 10 2019
pubmed: 5 12 2019
medline: 1 12 2020
entrez: 5 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research has linked exposure to the drinking of one's partner or spouse and changes in alcohol-related behaviours. However, there is a dearth of studies which consider only cohabiting relationships. More couples are preferring to cohabit prior to and in place of marriage. As a result, studies focused on cohabiting couples may provide a more representative consideration of modern long-term relationships. The present study uses a representative, longitudinal sample with annual follow-up and aims to determine if cohabiting partner's drinking habits are influenced by their partner's consumption, as well as consider the role of intimacy as a key component of these influences compared to a relationship's label or legal status. Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey identified 1483 newly cohabiting, Australian heterosexual couples between 2001 and 2016. Individual alcohol consumption was analysed using a cross-lagged, three-wave actor-partner structural equation model. A respondent's own drinking was a stable and significant predictor of future consumption, and a greater predictor of later drinking than their partner's. Female consumption generally exerted significant influence on their male partner's later consumption, while male drinking was non-significant for all but the first year following cohabitation. Overall, women generally had greater influence on their partner's drinking than men. This study furthers our understanding of each partner's role in influencing consumption within intimate relationships. Cohabiting couples appear to have some similarities with married couples regarding partner influence and may better represent the typical contemporary long-term relationship.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31797480
doi: 10.1111/dar.13007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

29-35

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.

Références

Australian Department of Health. National Drugs Strategy 2017-2026. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2017.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey (NDSHS) 2016 - detailed findings. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2017.
Bränström R, Sjöström E, Andréasson S. Individual, group and community risk and protective factors for alcohol and drug use among Swedish adolescents. Eur J Pub Health 2008;18:12-8.
Sudhinaraset M, Wigglesworth C, Takeuchi DT. Social and cultural contexts of alcohol use: influences in a social-ecological framework. Alcohol Res 2016;38:35-45.
Ryan SM, Jorm AF, Lubman DI. Parenting factors associated with reduced adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2010;44:774-83.
Windle M, Windle RC. A prospective study of alcohol use among middle-aged adults and marital partner influences on drinking. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2014;75:546-56.
Bartel SJ, Sherry SB, Molnar DS et al. Do romantic partners influence each other's heavy episodic drinking? Support for the partner influence hypothesis in a three-year longitudinal study. Addict Behav 2017;69:55-8.
Quine S, Stephenson JA. Predicting smoking and drinking intentions and behaviour of pre-adolescents: the influence of parents, siblings and peers. Family Syst Med 1990;8:191-200.
Leonard KE, Mudar P. Husbands' influence on wives' drinking: testing a relationship motivation model in the early years of marriage. Psychol Addict Behav 2004;18:340-9.
Callinan S, Livingston M, Room R, Dietze P. Drinking contexts and alcohol consumption: how much alcohol is consumed in different Australian locations? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2016;77:612-9.
Akers RL, Krohn MD, Lanza-Kaduce L, Radosevich M. Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. Am Sociol Rev 1979;44:636-55.
Latané B. The Psychology of Social Impact 1981. 343-56
Falba TA, Sindelar JL. Spousal concordance in health behavior change. Health Serv Res 2008;43:96-116.
Mushquash A, Stewart S, Sherry S, Mackinnon P, Antony M, Lee-Baggley D. Heavy episodic drinking among dating partners: a longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model. Psychol Addict Behav 2013;27:178-83.
Leonard KE, Homish GG. Predictors of heavy drinking and drinking problems over the first four years of marriage. Psychol Addict Behav 2008;22:25-35.
Australian Bureau of Statistics Marriages and Divorces, Australia, 2017. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2018. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3310.02017?OpenDocument. (accessed 27 November 2018)
Australian Institute of Family Studies. Living together in Australia. Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), 2013.
Cherlin AJ. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. J Marriage Fam 2004;66:848-61.
Lundberg S, Pollak RA. Cohabitation and the uneven retreat from marriage in the U.S., 1950-2010. Human Capital in History: The American record. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014:241-72.
Thornton A, Young-DeMarco L. Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through the 1990s. J Marriage Fam 2001;63:1009-37.
Musick K, Bumpass L. Reexamining the case for marriage: union formation and changes in well-being. J Marriage Fam 2012;74:1-18.
Brown SL, Manning WD, Payne KK. Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. J Fam Issues 2017;38:1730-53.
Duncan GJ, Bessie W, England P. Cleaning up their act: the effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography 2006;43:691-710.
Li Q, Wilsnack R, Wilsnack S, Kristjanson A. Cohabitation, gender, and alcohol consumption in 19 countries: a multilevel analysis. Subst Use Misuse 2010;45:2481-502.
Horn EE, Xu Y, Beam CR, Turkheimer E, Emery RE. Accounting for the physical and mental health benefits of entry into marriage: a genetically informed study of selection and causation. J Fam Psychol 2013;27:30-41.
Joutsenniemi K, Martelin T, Kestilä L, Martikainen P, Pirkola S, Koskinen S. Living arrangements, heavy drinking and alcohol dependence. Alcohol Alcohol 2007;42:480-91.
Dinescu D, Turkheimer E, Beam CR, Horn EE, Duncan G, Emery RE. Is marriage a buzzkill? A twin study of marital status and alcohol consumption. J Fam Psychol 2016;30:698-707.
Watson N, Wooden M. The HILDA Survey: A case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study, 2012, pp. 369-81.
Watson N, Wooden M. Data survey: the HILDA survey: Progress and future developments. Aust Econ Rev 2010;43:326-36.
Wilkins R, Lass I. The household, income and labour dynamics in Australia survey: selected findings from waves 1 to 16. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, University of Melbourne, 2018.
Australian Department of Social Services. Sample sizes and response rates for the Centre studies, 2018. Available at: https://www.dss.gov.au/about-the-department/national-centre-for-longitudinal-studies/growing-up-in-australia-the-longitudinal-study-of-australian-children-lsac/sample-sizes-and-response-rates-for-the-centre-studies (accessed 30 January 2018).
Cook W, Kenny D. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies, 2005, p. 101
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. MPlus User's Guide. 8 ed, 2017.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Chi-square difference testing using the S-B scaled chi-square, 2005 (Note on Mplus website). Available at: http://www.statmodel.com/chidiff.shtml.
Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika 2010;75:243-8.
Kenny D, Ledermann T. Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model. J Fam Psychol 2010;24:359-66.
Staff J, Schulenberg JE, Maslowsky J et al. Substance use changes and social role transitions: proximal developmental effects on ongoing trajectories from late adolescence through early adulthood. Dev Psychopathol 2010;22:917-32.
Leonard KE, Eiden RD. Marital and family processes in the context of alcohol use and alcohol disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007;3:285-310.

Auteurs

Geoffrey Leggat (G)

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Michael Livingston (M)

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Emmanuel Kuntsche (E)

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Sandra Kuntsche (S)

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Sarah Callinan (S)

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH