Understanding cause of stillbirth: a prospective observational multi-country study from sub-Saharan Africa.

Asphyxia Cause of stillbirth Low- and middle-income countries Perinatal death audit Quality of care Stillbirth Sub-Saharan Africa

Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 01 02 2019
accepted: 22 11 2019
entrez: 6 12 2019
pubmed: 6 12 2019
medline: 15 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Every year, an estimated 2.6 million stillbirths occur worldwide, with up to 98% occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). There is a paucity of primary data on cause of stillbirth from LMIC, and particularly from sub-Saharan Africa to inform effective interventions. This study aimed to identify the cause of stillbirths in low- and middle-income settings and compare methods of assessment. This was a prospective, observational study in 12 hospitals in Kenya, Malawi, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. Stillbirths (28 weeks or more) were reviewed to assign the cause of death by healthcare providers, an expert panel and by using computer-based algorithms. Agreement between the three methods was compared using Kappa (κ) analysis. Cause of stillbirth and level of agreement between the methods used to assign cause of death. One thousand five hundred sixty-three stillbirths were studied. The stillbirth rate (per 1000 births) was 20.3 in Malawi, 34.7 in Zimbabwe, 38.8 in Kenya and 118.1 in Sierra Leone. Half (50.7%) of all stillbirths occurred during the intrapartum period. Cause of death (range) overall varied by method of assessment and included: asphyxia (18.5-37.4%), placental disorders (8.4-15.1%), maternal hypertensive disorders (5.1-13.6%), infections (4.3-9.0%), cord problems (3.3-6.5%), and ruptured uterus due to obstructed labour (2.6-6.1%). Cause of stillbirth was unknown in 17.9-26.0% of cases. Moderate agreement was observed for cause of stillbirth as assigned by the expert panel and by hospital-based healthcare providers who conducted perinatal death review (κ = 0.69; p < 0.0005). There was only minimal agreement between expert panel review or healthcare provider review and computer-based algorithms (κ = 0.34; 0.31 respectively p < 0.0005). For the majority of stillbirths, an underlying likely cause of death could be determined despite limited diagnostic capacity. In these settings, more diagnostic information is, however, needed to establish a more specific cause of death for the majority of stillbirths. Existing computer-based algorithms used to assign cause of death require revision.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Every year, an estimated 2.6 million stillbirths occur worldwide, with up to 98% occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). There is a paucity of primary data on cause of stillbirth from LMIC, and particularly from sub-Saharan Africa to inform effective interventions. This study aimed to identify the cause of stillbirths in low- and middle-income settings and compare methods of assessment.
METHODS METHODS
This was a prospective, observational study in 12 hospitals in Kenya, Malawi, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. Stillbirths (28 weeks or more) were reviewed to assign the cause of death by healthcare providers, an expert panel and by using computer-based algorithms. Agreement between the three methods was compared using Kappa (κ) analysis. Cause of stillbirth and level of agreement between the methods used to assign cause of death.
RESULTS RESULTS
One thousand five hundred sixty-three stillbirths were studied. The stillbirth rate (per 1000 births) was 20.3 in Malawi, 34.7 in Zimbabwe, 38.8 in Kenya and 118.1 in Sierra Leone. Half (50.7%) of all stillbirths occurred during the intrapartum period. Cause of death (range) overall varied by method of assessment and included: asphyxia (18.5-37.4%), placental disorders (8.4-15.1%), maternal hypertensive disorders (5.1-13.6%), infections (4.3-9.0%), cord problems (3.3-6.5%), and ruptured uterus due to obstructed labour (2.6-6.1%). Cause of stillbirth was unknown in 17.9-26.0% of cases. Moderate agreement was observed for cause of stillbirth as assigned by the expert panel and by hospital-based healthcare providers who conducted perinatal death review (κ = 0.69; p < 0.0005). There was only minimal agreement between expert panel review or healthcare provider review and computer-based algorithms (κ = 0.34; 0.31 respectively p < 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For the majority of stillbirths, an underlying likely cause of death could be determined despite limited diagnostic capacity. In these settings, more diagnostic information is, however, needed to establish a more specific cause of death for the majority of stillbirths. Existing computer-based algorithms used to assign cause of death require revision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31801488
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2626-7
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2626-7
pmc: PMC6894270
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

470

Subventions

Organisme : Department for International Development
ID : 202945-101

Références

Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):45-51
pubmed: 23417211
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 7;1(3):e000065
pubmed: 28588954
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):319.e1-4
pubmed: 18771999
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar;24(3):449-52
pubmed: 21250906
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Mar;22(3):294-311
pubmed: 27992672
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121 Suppl 4:141-53
pubmed: 25236649
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121 Suppl 4:134-6
pubmed: 25236647
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120566
pubmed: 25793703
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S113-21, S121-2
pubmed: 19815206
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 May;96(5):519-528
pubmed: 28295150
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):85
pubmed: 28284197
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 May;109(2):155-6
pubmed: 20089251
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S9
pubmed: 26391558
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1113-7
pubmed: 16236774
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):212-224
pubmed: 29193794
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Sep;28(13):1585-8
pubmed: 25204335
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0215864
pubmed: 31071111
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Dec;58(6):667-673
pubmed: 29505671
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):131-138
pubmed: 28139875

Auteurs

Mamuda Aminu (M)

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. Mamuda.Aminu@lstmed.ac.uk.

Sarah Bar-Zeev (S)

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Sarah White (S)

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Matthews Mathai (M)

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Nynke van den Broek (N)

Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH