Citric-acid dialysate improves the calcification propensity of hemodialysis patients: A multicenter prospective randomized cross-over trial.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
31
03
2019
accepted:
12
11
2019
entrez:
6
12
2019
pubmed:
6
12
2019
medline:
25
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The concentration of dialysate calcium (dCa) has been suggested to affect vascular calcification, but evidence is scarce. Calcification propensity reflects the intrinsic capacity of serum to prevent calcium and phosphate to precipitate. The use of citric-acid dialysate may have a beneficial effect on the calcification propensity due to the chelating effect on calcium and magnesium. The aim of this study was to compare the intradialytic and short-term effects of haemodialysis with either standard acetic-acid dialysate with dCa1.50 (A1.5) or dCa1.25 (A1.25), as well as citric-acid dialysate with dCa1.50 (C1.5) in bicarbonate dialysis on the calcification propensity of serum. Chronic stable hemodialysis patients were included. This multicenter randomized cross-over study consisted out of a baseline week (A1.5), followed by the randomized sequence of A1.25 or C1.5 for one week after which the alternate treatment was provided after a washout week with A1.5. Calcification propensity of serum was assessed by time-resolved nephelometry where the T50 reflects the transition time between formation of primary and secondary calciprotein particles. Eighteen patients (median age 70 years) completed the study. Intradialytic change in T50 was increased with C1.5 (121 [90-152]min) compared to A1.25 (83 [43-108]min, p<0.001) and A1.5 (66 [18-102]min, p<0.001). During the treatment week, predialysis T50 increased significantly from the first to the third session with C1.5 (271 [234-291] to 280 [262-339]min, p = 0.002) and with A1.25 (274 [213-308] to 307 [256-337]min, p<0.001), but not with A1.5 (284 [235-346] to 300 [247-335]min, p = 0.33). Calcification propensity, as measured by the change in T50, improved significantly during treatment in C1.5 compared to A1.25 and A1.5. Long-term studies are needed to investigate the effects of different dialysate compositions concentrations on vascular calcification and bone mineral disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31805104
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225824
pii: PONE-D-19-05164
pmc: PMC6894765
doi:
Substances chimiques
Citric Acid
2968PHW8QP
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0225824Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Bernard Canaud and Adelheid Gauly are employed by Fresenius MC and may hold shares in this company. FS and JK received a grant of Fresenius Medical Care. With this they have set up this trial with BC, MD and KM. Andreas Pasch, Isabelle Gsponer and Matthias Bachtler are employed by Calciscon AG. Andreas Pasch holds shares in this company. Calciscon AG holds the following patent for the T50-Test [A Method For Determining The Propensity For Calcification (PCT/EP2012/071971)] and markets the T50- Test. There are no other patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Aug;31(8):1327-34
pubmed: 26442902
Biointerphases. 2007 Mar;2(1):16-20
pubmed: 20408632
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Sep;18(9):1731-40
pubmed: 12937218
Br Med J. 1973 Dec 15;4(5893):643-6
pubmed: 4758544
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug;27(8):2475-86
pubmed: 26701977
Nephron Clin Pract. 2007;106(1):c34-42
pubmed: 17409767
Blood Purif. 2016;42(4):337-346
pubmed: 27806355
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Oct;66(4):655-65
pubmed: 26015274
Blood Purif. 2007;25(1):139-49
pubmed: 17170552
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):315-322
pubmed: 27940458
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Feb;25(2):339-48
pubmed: 24179171
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;59(1):92-101
pubmed: 22000728
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Apr;9(2):103-7
pubmed: 23022293
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0151508
pubmed: 27064679
BMC Nephrol. 2009 Mar 05;10:7
pubmed: 19265544
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Sep;4(9):1459-64
pubmed: 19661218
J Nephrol. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):205-15
pubmed: 15293519
Blood Purif. 2015;39(1-3):181-7
pubmed: 25791278
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16(1):204-12
pubmed: 26375609
BMC Nephrol. 2013 Oct 09;14:216
pubmed: 24103587
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2043-2051
pubmed: 29860419
Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec;46(12):976-984
pubmed: 27689678
Hemodial Int. 2014 Apr;18(2):467-72
pubmed: 24261328
Kidney Int. 2010 Aug;78(4):343-50
pubmed: 20520595
Kidney Int. 2011 Jan;79(2):218-27
pubmed: 20811332
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jul;32(1):125-31
pubmed: 9669433
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):1373-1380
pubmed: 30131425
Nefrologia. 2012;32(5):579-86
pubmed: 23013943
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Apr;109(15):276-81
pubmed: 22567063
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1694
pubmed: 26448019
Kidney Int. 2005 Mar;67(3):1179-87
pubmed: 15698460
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1744-52
pubmed: 22956818