Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: a systematic review of early outcomes with pooled analysis.


Journal

Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1097-6779
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0010505

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 12 04 2019
accepted: 19 11 2019
pubmed: 7 12 2019
medline: 2 4 2021
entrez: 7 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic debilitating condition. Prior pyloric-targeted procedures are either invasive or have questionable efficacy. Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) has been proposed as a minimally invasive approach. We performed a pooled analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G-POEM for GP. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to January 2019. Studies including patients who underwent G-POEM for GP were eligible. Procedural, clinical, and safety outcomes were assessed by pooling data with a random- or fixed-effect model according to the degree of heterogeneity to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval. Ten studies were eligible for inclusion (292 patients), and 2 of the 10 studies were prospective. Seven studies were performed in the United States, 2 in France, and 1 in China. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy was feasible in all patients. Significant symptomatic improvement was achieved after 83.9% of procedures (mean follow-up, 7.8 ± 5.5 months). When comparing the mean values of pre- and postprocedural scintigraphic evolution, there was a significant decrease of the residual percentage at 2 and 4 hours. The overall adverse events rate was 6.8%. G-POEM appears to be a promising approach for GP in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes in the short term.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic debilitating condition. Prior pyloric-targeted procedures are either invasive or have questionable efficacy. Gastric peroral pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) has been proposed as a minimally invasive approach. We performed a pooled analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G-POEM for GP.
METHODS
Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to January 2019. Studies including patients who underwent G-POEM for GP were eligible. Procedural, clinical, and safety outcomes were assessed by pooling data with a random- or fixed-effect model according to the degree of heterogeneity to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
Ten studies were eligible for inclusion (292 patients), and 2 of the 10 studies were prospective. Seven studies were performed in the United States, 2 in France, and 1 in China. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy was feasible in all patients. Significant symptomatic improvement was achieved after 83.9% of procedures (mean follow-up, 7.8 ± 5.5 months). When comparing the mean values of pre- and postprocedural scintigraphic evolution, there was a significant decrease of the residual percentage at 2 and 4 hours. The overall adverse events rate was 6.8%.
CONCLUSIONS
G-POEM appears to be a promising approach for GP in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes in the short term.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31809720
pii: S0016-5107(19)32489-7
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.039
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

746-752.e5

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marco Spadaccini (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Roberta Maselli (R)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar (VT)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Andrea Anderloni (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Silvia Carrara (S)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Piera Alessia Galtieri (PA)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Milena Di Leo (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Alessandro Fugazza (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Gaia Pellegatta (G)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Matteo Colombo (M)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Rossella Palma (R)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Cesare Hassan (C)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Amrita Sethi (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York-Presbyterian Medical Center/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Mouen A Khashab (MA)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Prateek Sharma (P)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Alessandro Repici (A)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH