Associations between school-based peer networks and smoking according to socioeconomic status and tobacco control context: protocol for a mixed method systematic review.


Journal

Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 12 2019
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
accepted: 08 11 2019
entrez: 8 12 2019
pubmed: 8 12 2019
medline: 17 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Smoking remains a major public health concern. School-based social networks influence uptake of smoking among peers. During the past two decades, the UK macro-systemic context within which schools are nested and interact with has changed, with anti-smoking norms having become set at a more macro-systemic level. Whilst the overall prevalence of smoking in the UK has decreased, inequality has prevailed. It is plausible that the influence of school-based social networks on smoking uptake may vary according to socioeconomic status. Therefore, this study aims to understand how social influence on smoking among adolescents has changed in line with variance within and between contexts according to time and geography. The following databases will be searched: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), British Education Index, Sociological abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Scopus. Additional searches will include reference checking of key papers, citation tracking, word of mouth and grey literature searches. The search strategies will incorporate terms relating to smoking, adolescents, schools, peers, network analysis and qualitative research. Titles and abstracts and full texts will be independently screened and assessed for quality by at least two researchers. Included studies will be assessed for quality, and data will be extracted for synthesis, including participant characteristics, setting and tobacco control context, study design and methods, analysis and results and conclusions. Quantitative findings will be narratively synthesised, whilst a lines of argument synthesis combined with refutational analysis will be employed to synthesise qualitative data. Both sets of findings will be charted on a timeline to add context to network findings and obtain an enhanced understanding of changes over time. This protocol is for a mixed methods synthesis of both social network findings, to investigate social structures and qualitative studies, to elicit contextual information. The review will synthesise changes in the context of social influence on adolescent smoking over time and geographically. As context is increasingly recognised as a key source of complexity, this enhanced understanding will help to inform future interventions targeting smoking through social influence. This will help to enhance their relevance to context, subsequent effectiveness and targeting of inequalities. PROSPERO CRD42019137358.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Smoking remains a major public health concern. School-based social networks influence uptake of smoking among peers. During the past two decades, the UK macro-systemic context within which schools are nested and interact with has changed, with anti-smoking norms having become set at a more macro-systemic level. Whilst the overall prevalence of smoking in the UK has decreased, inequality has prevailed. It is plausible that the influence of school-based social networks on smoking uptake may vary according to socioeconomic status. Therefore, this study aims to understand how social influence on smoking among adolescents has changed in line with variance within and between contexts according to time and geography.
METHODS
The following databases will be searched: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), British Education Index, Sociological abstracts, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Scopus. Additional searches will include reference checking of key papers, citation tracking, word of mouth and grey literature searches. The search strategies will incorporate terms relating to smoking, adolescents, schools, peers, network analysis and qualitative research. Titles and abstracts and full texts will be independently screened and assessed for quality by at least two researchers. Included studies will be assessed for quality, and data will be extracted for synthesis, including participant characteristics, setting and tobacco control context, study design and methods, analysis and results and conclusions. Quantitative findings will be narratively synthesised, whilst a lines of argument synthesis combined with refutational analysis will be employed to synthesise qualitative data. Both sets of findings will be charted on a timeline to add context to network findings and obtain an enhanced understanding of changes over time.
DISCUSSION
This protocol is for a mixed methods synthesis of both social network findings, to investigate social structures and qualitative studies, to elicit contextual information. The review will synthesise changes in the context of social influence on adolescent smoking over time and geographically. As context is increasingly recognised as a key source of complexity, this enhanced understanding will help to inform future interventions targeting smoking through social influence. This will help to enhance their relevance to context, subsequent effectiveness and targeting of inequalities.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019137358.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31810493
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1225-z
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1225-z
pmc: PMC6896310
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

313

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023233/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C64562/A26532
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:307-23
pubmed: 25581153
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):623-4
pubmed: 18310213
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):1027-1031
pubmed: 30166065
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):698
pubmed: 31170941
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):417-30
pubmed: 15893056
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1467-74
pubmed: 20207059
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Oct;37(4):323-9
pubmed: 16182143
Thorax. 2011 Oct;66(10):847-55
pubmed: 21325144
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jan;43:45-59
pubmed: 24267752
Br Educ Res J. 2017 Apr;43(2):310-329
pubmed: 28529392
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43
pubmed: 22829486
J Sch Health. 2015 Apr;85(4):267-75
pubmed: 25731201
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 03;13:798
pubmed: 24007211
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29-45
pubmed: 24188053
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):216-21
pubmed: 18172133
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Apr;72(4):319-323
pubmed: 29321174
Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Jun;35(5):699-715
pubmed: 23009704
J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Mar;57(1):22-38
pubmed: 26957133
J Sch Health. 2012 Jan;82(1):21-7
pubmed: 22142171
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):964-968
pubmed: 27335332
Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jan;25(1):23-45
pubmed: 30705608
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Jul - Aug;38(4):325-333
pubmed: 28089317
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1595-602
pubmed: 18468543
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 17;15:907
pubmed: 26381233
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Mar 21;8:91
pubmed: 25888868

Auteurs

H J Littlecott (HJ)

Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK. LittlecottH@cardiff.ac.uk.

J Hawkins (J)

Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK.

M Mann (M)

Specialist Unit for Review Evidence (SURE), Cardiff University, Level 5, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.

G J Melendez-Torres (GJ)

Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

F Dobbie (F)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 1, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.

G Moore (G)

Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH