Factors associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer using real-world data: a follow-up analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular
/ drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fulvestrant
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Postmenopause
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
Receptors, Progesterone
/ metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Antineoplastic agents
Breast cancer
Hormones
Overall survival
Post-menopause
Journal
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1880-4233
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100888201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
24
06
2019
accepted:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
8
12
2019
medline:
3
2
2021
entrez:
8
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assessing survival risk is important for discussing treatment options with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. However, there are few reports from large-scale databases on the survival risk factors in ER+ ABC. The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 1072 Japanese patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg mostly as a second- or later-line endocrine therapy for ER+ ABC. The follow-up data after the Safari study were examined, focusing on any relationship between clinicopathological factors and overall survival (OS) in ER+ ABC patients. OS in patients with ER+ ABC was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards model in this study. A total of 1031 cases were evaluable for OS analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age (< 60 years), longer time from ABC diagnosis to fulvestrant use (≥ 3 years), no prior palliative chemotherapy before fulvestrant use, and progesterone receptor (PgR) negativity (PgR-) were significantly correlated with prolonged OS (median 7.0 years). For cases with histological or nuclear grade data, lower histological or nuclear grades were also correlated with longer OS. In recurrent metastatic cases, long disease-free interval (DFI) was not correlated with longer OS. In ER+ ABC patients whose treatment history included fulvestrant, younger age, longer time from ABC diagnosis to fulvestrant use, no prior palliative chemotherapy use, PgR-, and lower histological or nuclear grade correlated positively with prolonged OS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Assessing survival risk is important for discussing treatment options with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. However, there are few reports from large-scale databases on the survival risk factors in ER+ ABC. The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 1072 Japanese patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg mostly as a second- or later-line endocrine therapy for ER+ ABC. The follow-up data after the Safari study were examined, focusing on any relationship between clinicopathological factors and overall survival (OS) in ER+ ABC patients.
METHODS
METHODS
OS in patients with ER+ ABC was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards model in this study.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1031 cases were evaluable for OS analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age (< 60 years), longer time from ABC diagnosis to fulvestrant use (≥ 3 years), no prior palliative chemotherapy before fulvestrant use, and progesterone receptor (PgR) negativity (PgR-) were significantly correlated with prolonged OS (median 7.0 years). For cases with histological or nuclear grade data, lower histological or nuclear grades were also correlated with longer OS. In recurrent metastatic cases, long disease-free interval (DFI) was not correlated with longer OS.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In ER+ ABC patients whose treatment history included fulvestrant, younger age, longer time from ABC diagnosis to fulvestrant use, no prior palliative chemotherapy use, PgR-, and lower histological or nuclear grade correlated positively with prolonged OS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31811519
doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01029-3
pii: 10.1007/s12282-019-01029-3
pmc: PMC7196081
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Receptors, Progesterone
0
Fulvestrant
22X328QOC4
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
389-398Références
EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group), McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:2127–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8
Redig AJ, McAllister SS. Breast cancer as a systemic disease: a view of metastasis. J Intern Med. 2013;274:113–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12084 .
doi: 10.1111/joim.12084
pubmed: 23844915
pmcid: 3711134
Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E. Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:vii11-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds232 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds232
pubmed: 22997442
Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E, Aapro M, André F, Barrios CH, et al. 3rd ESO–ESMO International consensus guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). Breast. 2017;31:244–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.001
pubmed: 27927580
Migliaccio I, Malorni L, Hart CD, Guarducci C, Di Leo A. Endocrine therapy considerations in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative advanced breast cancers. BMC Med. 2015;13:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0280-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0280-0
pubmed: 25857348
pmcid: 4350905
Başaran GA, Twelves C, Diéras V, Cortés J, Awada A. Ongoing unmet needs in treating estrogen receptor positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;63:144–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.002
pubmed: 29329006
Brodowicz T, Lang I, Kahan Z, Greil R, Beslija S, Stemmer SM, et al. Selecting first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for advanced breast cancer: TURANDOT risk factor analyses. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:2051–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.504 .
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.504
pubmed: 25268370
pmcid: 4260030
Zhang XH, Giuliano M, Trivedi MV, Schiff R, Osborne CK. Metastasis dormancy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6389–97. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0838 .
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0838
pubmed: 24298069
Ignatiadis M, Sotiriou C. Luminal breast cancer: from biology to treatment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:494–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.124 .
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.124
pubmed: 23881035
Llombart-Cussac A, Pivot X, Biganzoli L, Cortes-Funes H, Pritchard KI, Pierga JY, et al. A prognostic factor index for overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: an analysis of the ATHENA trial. Breast. 2014;23:656–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2014.06.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.06.017
pubmed: 25047747
Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, Ingle JN, Martino S, Rowinsky EK, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588–92. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.08.013 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.013
pubmed: 12586793
Yamamoto N, Watanabe T, Katsumata N, Omuro Y, Ando M, Fukuda H, et al. Construction and validation of a practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2401–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2401 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2401
pubmed: 9667257
Yamamura J, Kamigaki S, Tsujie M, Fujita J, Osato H, Higashi C, et al. Response to first-line recurrence treatment influences survival in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a multicenter study. Vivo. 2019;33:281–7. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11473 .
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11473
Ogiya A, Yamazaki K, Horii R, Shien T, Horimoto Y, Masuda N, et al. Collaborative Study Group of Scientific Research of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Post-relapse survival in patients with the early and late distant recurrence in estrogen receptor positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2017;24:473–82. https://hdl.handle.net/2115/70047
Kawaguchi H, Masuda N, Nakayama T, Aogi K, Anan K, Ito Y, et al. Outcomes of fulvestrant therapy among Japanese women with advanced breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study (JBCRG-C06; Safari). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;163:545–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4212-x .
doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4212-x
pubmed: 28337663
Kawaguchi H, Masuda N, Nakayama T, Aogi K, Anan K, Ito Y, et al. Factors associated with prolonged time to treatment failure with fulvestrant 500 mg in patients with post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a sub-group analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34:49–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1400426 .
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1400426
pubmed: 29095648
Faslodex
Faslodex
Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii11-9.
pubmed: 22997442
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Invasive breast cancer (Version 4.2018). Fort Washington (PA): NCCN; 2017. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp . Accessed 5 May 2019
Caswell-Jin JL, Plevritis SK, Tian L, Cadham CJ, Xu C, Stout NK, et al. Change in survival in metastatic breast cancer with treatment advances: meta-analysis and systematic review. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018;2:pky062. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pky062 .
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky062
pubmed: 30627694
pmcid: 6305243
Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, Smilde TJ, et al. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1445–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127 .
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.127
pubmed: 25880008
pmcid: 4453676
Chen MT, Sun HF, Zhao Y, Fu WY, Yang LP, Gao SP, et al. Comparison of patterns and prognosis among distant metastatic breast cancer patients by age groups: a SEER population-based analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;23(7):9254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10166-8 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10166-8
Hojo T, Masuda N, Mizutani T, Shibata T, Kinoshita T, Tamura K, et al. Intensive vs. standard post-operative surveillance in high-risk breast cancer patients (INSPIRE): Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1204. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:983–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyv110 .
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv110
pubmed: 26246481
Gordis L. Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 318.
Abe S. Japan’s vision for a peaceful and healthier world. Lancet. 2015;386:2367–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01172-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01172-1
pubmed: 26700515
pmcid: 7138109
Abe S. Japan's strategy for global health diplomacy: why it matters. Lancet. 2013;382:915–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61639-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61639-6
pubmed: 24034284
Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J, Barriere J, Namer M, Mari V, et al. Prognostic factors in 1,038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:2012–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn424 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn424
pubmed: 18641006
pmcid: 2733115
Sánchez C, Camus M, Medina L, Oddo D, Artigas RC, Pérez Sepúlveda A, et al. Clinico-pathologic subtypes of breast cancer primary tumors are related to prognosis after recurrence. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:5081–6.
pubmed: 28122438
pmcid: 5454640
Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M, André F, et al. 4th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1634–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy192 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy192
pubmed: 30032243
Huang X, Cormier JN, Pisters PW. Estimation of the causal effects on survival of two-stage nonrandomized treatment sequences for recurrent diseases. Biometrics. 2006;62:901–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00520.x