Inflammatory markers in systemic lupus erythematosus.


Journal

Journal of autoimmunity
ISSN: 1095-9157
Titre abrégé: J Autoimmun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8812164

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 20 11 2019
accepted: 20 11 2019
pubmed: 10 12 2019
medline: 6 8 2021
entrez: 9 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

While systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoantibody and immune complex disease by nature, most of its organ manifestations are in fact inflammatory. SLE activity scores thus heavily rely on assessing inflammation in the various organs. This focus on clinical items demonstrates that routine laboratory markers of inflammation are still limited in their impact. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is used, but represents a rather crude overall measure. Anemia and diminished serum albumin play a role in estimating inflammatory activity, but both are reflecting more than one mechanism, and the association with inflammation is complex. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a better marker for infections than for SLE activity, where there is only a limited association, and procalcitonin (PCT) is also mainly used for detecting severe bacterial infection. Of the cytokines directly induced by immune complexes, type I interferons, interleukin-18 (IL-18) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are correlated with inflammatory disease activity. Still, precise and timely measurement is an issue, which is why they are not currently used for routine purposes. While somewhat more robust in the assays, IL-18 binding protein (IL-18BP) and soluble TNF-receptor 2 (TNF-R2), which are related to the respective cytokines, have not yet made it into clinical routine. The same is true for several chemokines that are increased with activity and relatively easy to measure, but still experimental parameters. In the urine, proteinuria leads and is essential for assessing kidney involvement, but may also result from damage. Similar to the situation in serum and plasma, several cytokines and chemokines perform reasonably well in scientific studies, but are not routine parameters. Cellular elements in the urine are more difficult to assess in the routine laboratory, where sufficient routine is not always available. Therefore, the analysis of urinary T cells may have potential for better monitoring renal inflammation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31812331
pii: S0896-8411(19)30777-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102374
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Cytokines 0
Inflammation Mediators 0
C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102374

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Martin Aringer (M)

University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: martin.aringer@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH