Social Media in Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.


Journal

Current cardiology reviews
ISSN: 1875-6557
Titre abrégé: Curr Cardiol Rev
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101261935

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 27 07 2019
revised: 19 11 2019
accepted: 21 11 2019
pubmed: 11 12 2019
medline: 23 6 2021
entrez: 11 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Among social media (SoMe) platforms, Twitter and YouTube have gained popularity, facilitating communication between cardiovascular professionals and patients. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to assess the source profile and content of Twitter and YouTube posts about heart failure (HF). We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline using the terms "cardiology," "social media," and "heart failure". We included full-text manuscripts published between January 1, 1999, and April 14, 2019. We searched Twitter and YouTube for posts using the hashtags "#heartfailure", "#HF", or "#CHF" on May 15, 2019 and July 6, 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data. Three publications met inclusion criteria, providing 677 tweets for source profile analysis; institutions (54.8%), health professionals (26.6%), and patients (19.4%) were the most common source profiles. The publications provided 1,194 tweets for content analysis: 83.3% were on education for professionals; 33.7% were on patient empowerment; and 22.3% were on research promotion. Our search on Twitter and YouTube generated 2,252 tweets and > 400 videos, of which we analyzed 260 tweets and 260 videos. Sources included institutions (53.5% Twitter, 64.2% You- Tube), health professionals (42.3%, 28.5%), and patients (4.2%, 7.3%). Content included education for professionals (39.2% Twitter, 62.3% YouTube), patient empowerment (20.4%, 21.9%), research promotion (28.8%, 13.1%), professional advocacy (5.8%, 2.7%), and research collaboration (5.8%, 0%). Twitter and YouTube are platforms for knowledge translation in HF, with contributions from institutions, health professionals, and less commonly, from patients. Both focus largely on education for professionals and less commonly on patient empowerment. Twitter includes more research promotion, research collaboration, and professional advocacy than YouTube.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Among social media (SoMe) platforms, Twitter and YouTube have gained popularity, facilitating communication between cardiovascular professionals and patients.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to assess the source profile and content of Twitter and YouTube posts about heart failure (HF).
METHODS METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline using the terms "cardiology," "social media," and "heart failure". We included full-text manuscripts published between January 1, 1999, and April 14, 2019. We searched Twitter and YouTube for posts using the hashtags "#heartfailure", "#HF", or "#CHF" on May 15, 2019 and July 6, 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the data.
RESULTS RESULTS
Three publications met inclusion criteria, providing 677 tweets for source profile analysis; institutions (54.8%), health professionals (26.6%), and patients (19.4%) were the most common source profiles. The publications provided 1,194 tweets for content analysis: 83.3% were on education for professionals; 33.7% were on patient empowerment; and 22.3% were on research promotion. Our search on Twitter and YouTube generated 2,252 tweets and > 400 videos, of which we analyzed 260 tweets and 260 videos. Sources included institutions (53.5% Twitter, 64.2% You- Tube), health professionals (42.3%, 28.5%), and patients (4.2%, 7.3%). Content included education for professionals (39.2% Twitter, 62.3% YouTube), patient empowerment (20.4%, 21.9%), research promotion (28.8%, 13.1%), professional advocacy (5.8%, 2.7%), and research collaboration (5.8%, 0%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Twitter and YouTube are platforms for knowledge translation in HF, with contributions from institutions, health professionals, and less commonly, from patients. Both focus largely on education for professionals and less commonly on patient empowerment. Twitter includes more research promotion, research collaboration, and professional advocacy than YouTube.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31820703
pii: CCR-EPUB-102889
doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191210143657
pmc: PMC8226208
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

161-170

Informations de copyright

Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Références

Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11
pubmed: 28785469
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):439-444
pubmed: 28882545
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
J Card Fail. 2007 Oct;13(8):643-8
pubmed: 17923356
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 15;171(3):368-76
pubmed: 24398230
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jan-Mar;6(1):24-27
pubmed: 30599012
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004736
pubmed: 29650720
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov;11(11):e005018
pubmed: 30571329
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92744
pubmed: 24671210
BMJ. 2019 Feb 13;364:l223
pubmed: 30760447
J Clin Med. 2018 May 28;7(6):
pubmed: 29843360
Health Informatics J. 2015 Sep;21(3):173-94
pubmed: 24670899
J Evid Based Med. 2013 Nov;6(4):216-20
pubmed: 24325413
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Dec 01;1(9):1032-1036
pubmed: 27680322
Acad Med. 2019 Oct;94(10):1546-1553
pubmed: 31149923
Congenit Heart Dis. 2018 Sep;13(5):721-727
pubmed: 30230232
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911528
pubmed: 31532517
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Sep;4(3):198-206
pubmed: 15916924
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 30;15(1):e21
pubmed: 23367505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 12;73(9):1089-1093
pubmed: 30846102
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan;7(1):188-90
pubmed: 24347662
J Card Fail. 2017 Mar;23(3):266-267
pubmed: 28010999
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 15;18(11):e295
pubmed: 27847349
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 6;71(9):1044-1047
pubmed: 29495984
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 31;69(4):452-462
pubmed: 28012614

Auteurs

Yousif Eliya (Y)

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Danielle Pellegrini (D)

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Andreas B Gevaert (AB)

Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Jillianne Code (J)

Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Harriette G C Van Spall (HGC)

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH