Protocol for the CONNECT project: a mixed methods study investigating patient preferences for communication technology use in orthopaedic rehabilitation consultations.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 12 2019
Historique:
entrez: 14 12 2019
pubmed: 14 12 2019
medline: 1 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Technology has been placed at the centre of global health policy and has been cited as having the potential to increase efficiency and remove geographical boundaries for patients to access care. Communication technology may support patients with orthopaedic problems, which is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. There are several examples of technology being used in clinical research, although uptake in practice remains low. An understanding of patient preferences will support the design of a communication technology supported treatment pathway for patients undergoing orthopaedic rehabilitation. This mixed methods project will be conducted in four phases. In phase I, a systematic review of qualitative studies reporting communication technology use for orthopaedic rehabilitation will be conducted to devise a taxonomy of tasks patients' face when using these technologies to access their care. In phase II, qualitative interviews will investigate how the work of being a patient changes during face-to-face and communication technology consultations and how these changes influence preference. In phase III, a discrete choice experiment will investigate the factors that influence preferences for the use of communication technology for orthopaedic rehabilitation consultations. Phase IV will be a practical application of these results. We will design a 'minimally disruptive' communication technology supported pathway for patients undergoing orthopaedic rehabilitation. The design of a pathway and underpinning patient preference will assist in understanding factors that might influence technology implementation for clinical care. This study requires ethical approval for phases II, III and IV. Approvals have been received for phase II (approval received on 4 December 2016 from the South Central-Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 255172, REC Reference 18/SC/0663)) and phase III (approval received on 18 October 2019 from the London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 248064, REC Reference 19/LO/1586)) and will be sought for phase IV. All participants will provide informed written consent prior to being enrolled onto the study. CRD42018100896.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31831552
pii: bmjopen-2019-035210
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035210
pmc: PMC6924859
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e035210

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ICA-CDRF-2017-03-025
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ. 2009 Aug 11;339:b2803
pubmed: 19671932
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e020515
pubmed: 30813114
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009388
pubmed: 26826147
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jan 28;13:10
pubmed: 23356353
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(2):118-22
pubmed: 26181526
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 07;6:86
pubmed: 16827928
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Feb;11(1):53-59
pubmed: 30719098
Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):235-43
pubmed: 21555751
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):737-42
pubmed: 26183642
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 26;14:281
pubmed: 24969758
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:112-114
pubmed: 28648308
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1743-1750
pubmed: 27014966
Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914-8
pubmed: 3632732
Lancet. 2002 Jun 8;359(9322):1961-8
pubmed: 12076550
BMJ. 2013 Jan 29;346:f43
pubmed: 23360891
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18
pubmed: 23406398
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141
pubmed: 27756414

Auteurs

Anthony William Gilbert (AW)

Therapies Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK anthony.gilbert@nhs.net.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Jeremy Jones (J)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Maria Stokes (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Emmanouil Mentzakis (E)

Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Science, University of Southapton, Southampton, UK.

Carl R May (CR)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH